On 10/04/2011 11:12 AM, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/09/2011 06:46 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I always saw those two warnings (paraphrased):
Lexer.cpp:197 may be used uninitialized
void Lexer::Pimpl::verifyTable()
{
// [...]
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:31:47AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/09/2011 06:46 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> >I always saw those two warnings (paraphrased):
> >Lexer.cpp:197 may be used uninitialized
void Lexer::Pimpl::verifyTable()
{
// [...]
if (table <- this line?
On 04/09/2011 06:46 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I always saw those two warnings (paraphrased):
Lexer.cpp:197 may be used uninitialized
Server.cpp:1018 ignoring return value of write(...)
The Lexer one has been there forever. I'm not sure why we get it, and
I'm certainly not sure why removing the a
Stephan Witt writes:
> Apropos...
>
> What about this?
Looks good.
JMarc
I think this one is for you:
In file included from /home/software/lyx-trunk/src/bufferlist.C:20:
/home/software/lyx-trunk/src/session.h:40: warning: `class
lyx::SessionSection'
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
OK. I will give them an empty one.
Cheers,
Bo
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:47:33AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > | No 'å' in TeX after booting. Face it. You are forgotten in troll land.
> | >
> | > No go explain the
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:47:33AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | No 'å' in TeX after booting. Face it. You are forgotten in troll land.
| >
| > No go explain the '^?' to me.
|
| ASCII 127 in the source there...
|
| Ok, in this case we might
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:47:33AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | No 'å' in TeX after booting. Face it. You are forgotten in troll land.
>
> No go explain the '^?' to me.
ASCII 127 in the source there...
Ok, in this case we might use the 127 literally.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to giv
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:37:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | Actually, looking at the 'fix', if this stops the wrning then it is
| > | indeed brain dead:
| > |
| > | - theCatcode['\\'] = catEscape;
| > | + theCatcode[int('\\')
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:21:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm going to try and book a flight tonight. If it's not too
> >> expensive this late then I'll see you in Chemnitz.
> >
> > RyanAir Stansted <-> Altenburg 30 GPB (24-29 July)
> >
> >
> http://www.bookryanair.com/skyl
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:00:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Hello Angus. What about your plans for next week btw?
>>
>> I'm going to try and book a flight tonight. If it's not too
>> expensive this late then I'll see you in Chemnitz.
>
> RyanAir Stansted <-> A
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:28:21PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-03/msg00822.html
>
> First answer is wrong for C++, 'c' has type 'char'...
I know, as I pointed out ...
> Come on, leave the cruft in, and do something serious. Testing the
> noupdate patch for ins
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:00:43PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Hello Angus. What about your plans for next week btw?
>
> I'm going to try and book a flight tonight. If it's not too
> expensive this late then I'll see you in Chemnitz.
RyanAir Stansted <-> Altenburg 30 GPB (24-29 July)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Then, for $DEITY's sake, change it the way you like.
>>
>> Why so scratchy?
>
> Because we've already spend much more time on that issue than it is
> worth while more serious stuff lies dormant.
>
>> I wa
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Then, for $DEITY's sake, change it the way you like.
>
> Why so scratchy?
Because we've already spend much more time on that issue than it is
worth while more serious stuff lies dormant.
> I was only saying hello.
Hello Angus.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:21:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> Elsewhere, wouldn't
>> >> void MathCursor::selPaste(lyx::size_type n)
>> >> be better than using size_t here?
>> >
>> > Why? vector<>::size_type is required to be size_t, n
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> This is the _initial_ set of TeX's cat codes. They have not changed
> during the last twenty years and it is Don Knuth's emphatically
> expressed will that they won't change ever.
>
> No 'å' in TeX after booting. Face it. You are f
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:37:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Actually, looking at the 'fix', if this stops the wrning then it is
> | indeed brain dead:
> |
> | - theCatcode['\\'] = catEscape;
> | + theCatcode[int('\\')] = catEscape;
> |
>
> except when somebody tries:
>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
|
| > sigh
| >
| > This is completely legal code.
| >
| > I've committed a 'fix' nevertheless, just to shut up the compiler.
|
| Incidentally, what is it really trying to do? Warn us that the
| subscript is signed and so might b
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:21:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> Elsewhere, wouldn't
> >> void MathCursor::selPaste(lyx::size_type n)
> >> be better than using size_t here?
> >
> > Why? vector<>::size_type is required to be size_t, not
> > lyx::size_type...
>
>
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Elsewhere, wouldn't
>> void MathCursor::selPaste(lyx::size_type n)
>> be better than using size_t here?
>
> Why? vector<>::size_type is required to be size_t, not
> lyx::size_type...
But you are hiding the fact that you store the stuff in a vector yet
should stil
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:17:36PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:07:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > In either case, we use only positive 7 bit values there.
>
> Well, assuming ascii ...
>
> Even so, I did ask about this, to no avail :
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:14:18PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 July 2003 16:07, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > In either case, we use only positive 7 bit values there. So the
> > message _is_ braindead.
>
> Oh, do you mean that ISO C++ requires that '\\' is always less than
> 12
John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, what is it really trying to do? Warn us that the
>> subscript is signed and so might be negative?
>
> No, it's warning that "char" may be signed /or/ unsigned, and that's
> platform dependent.
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:07:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> In either case, we use only positive 7 bit values there.
Well, assuming ascii ...
Even so, I did ask about this, to no avail :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-03/msg00822.html
I suspect because testing for positiveness would make
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 16:07, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> In either case, we use only positive 7 bit values there.
> So the message _is_ braindead.
Oh, do you mean that ISO C++ requires that '\\' is always less than 127? Ok,
I think I stepped that part. ;-)
I know that weird IBM charset, EBC
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:05:03PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Incidentally, what is it really trying to do? Warn us that the
> > subscript is signed and so might be negative?
>
> No, it's warning that "char" may be signed /or/
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > sigh
> >
> > This is completely legal code.
> >
> > I've committed a 'fix' nevertheless, just to shut up the compiler.
>
> Incidentally, what is it really trying to do? Warn us that the
> subscript is s
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Incidentally, what is it really trying to do? Warn us that the
> subscript is signed and so might be negative?
No, it's warning that "char" may be signed /or/ unsigned, and that's
platform dependent.
We've been through this one be
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> sigh
>
> This is completely legal code.
>
> I've committed a 'fix' nevertheless, just to shut up the compiler.
Incidentally, what is it really trying to do? Warn us that the
subscript is signed and so might be negative?
Actually, looking at the 'fix', if this stops the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:18:43PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> math_parser.C:154: warning: array subscript has type `char'
> math_parser.C:155: warning: array subscript has type `char'
> math_parser.C:156: warning: array subscript has type `char'
> math_parser.C:157: warning: array subscrip
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> but abs on a unsigned type or a type converted from unsiged is
| Lars> an oxymoron, isn't it?
|
| Lars> but I guess you are planning a
|
| Lars> int(uint) - int t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@
| #include "language.h"
| #include "debug.h"
|
| +using std::abs;
| using std::endl;
| using std::max;
| using std::min;
| @@ -213,8 +215,7 @@ void XScreen::draw(LyXText * text, Buffe
| text->first_y = y;
|
|
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> but abs on a unsigned type or a type converted from unsiged is
Lars> an oxymoron, isn't it?
Lars> but I guess you are planning a
Lars> int(uint) - int thing
Yes.
Lars> | And is abs always supposed to be in std:: for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| >> Is that true that unsigned int - int == int ?
|
| Andre> No.
|
| Andre> unsigned int - int == unsigned int
|
| Andre> As stupid as this maybe math-wise
|
| Yes, that's wh
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:43:03AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Is that true that unsigned int - int == int ?
>
> Andre> No.
>
> Andre> unsigned int - int == unsigned int
>
> Andre> As stupid as this maybe math-wise
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is that true that unsigned int - int == int ?
Andre> No.
Andre> unsigned int - int == unsigned int
Andre> As stupid as this maybe math-wise
Yes, that's what I meant to write. So I should static_cast, right?
And is abs always
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:35:37AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> ../../../../lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/xscreen.C: In method `void
>XScreen::draw(LyXText *, BufferView *, unsigned int)':
> ../../../../lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/xscreen.C:218: call of overloaded `abs
>(unsigned int)
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> That's why I posted here. However, I fail to see how the two
Lars> forms I | posted may have any difference. Am I blind?
Lars> It looks correct to me as well.
I feel stu
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:18:55PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> posted may have any difference. Am I blind?
I don't see a difference either.
Andre' (usually in need of glasses)
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either o
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| That's why I posted here. However, I fail to see how the two forms I
| posted may have any difference. Am I blind?
It looks correct to me as well.
--
Lgb
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:18:55PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> // is any optimization possible? if (std::abs(y - old_first) <
> >> owner_.workHeight())
>
> That's why I posted here. However, I fail to see how the two forms I
> posted may have any difference. Am I blind?
Probably not,
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:26:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> This one is weird: the code reads
>>
>> // is any optimization possible? if ((y - old_first) <
>> owner_.workHeight() && (old_first - y) < owner_.workHeight(
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:26:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This one is weird: the code reads
>
> // is any optimization possible?
> if ((y - old_first) < owner_.workHeight()
> && (old_first - y) < owner_.workHeight())
>
> is there a reason why the test is not
>
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Hi, please find the current list of compiler warnings below
Michael> (gcc-3.2, xforms frontend). I think a few of them are easily
Michael> fixable.
Michael> xscreen.C: In member function
Michael> `virtual void XScreen::draw(L
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Any good reasons to not do this:
OK, I did it.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | vspace.C:447: warning: control reaches end of non-void
Lars> function | `VSpace::asLatexCommand(const BufferParams &) const'
Lars> Easy to fix... _but_ as I have no (clean)[1] lyx tree checked
Lars> out at the moment I will
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 8:34 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | ../../src/insets/insetgraphics.h:122: warning: member initializers for
> | `const class string InsetGraphics::graphic_label'
> | ../../src/insets/insetgraphics.h:125: warning: a
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:34:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
...
> [1] I have three trees, one with the paragraph changes, one with
> layout as string and a third with textclass as string in addition to
> layout as string.
>
> --
> Lgb
What about just putting either of the last
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:06:04PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Could you please fix these warnings even if they are harmless?
my bad. will fix.
john
--
"Not to laugh, not to lament, not to curse, but to understand."
- Spinoza
On Fre, 05 Feb 1999 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Robert" == Robert Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Robert> I built Lyx 1.0.0 on a Alpha running RedHat Linux 4.2 +
>Robert> updates. I compiled with g++ from the egcs 1.1.1
>Robert> distribution. The following warnings were a little wo
> "Robert" == Robert Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> I built Lyx 1.0.0 on a Alpha running RedHat Linux 4.2 +
Robert> updates. I compiled with g++ from the egcs 1.1.1
Robert> distribution. The following warnings were a little worrying:
Yes, they are a bit strange indeed. Are you
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Robert Harley wrote:
> g++ -c -g -O2 -I. -I. -I../images -I/usr/X11R6/include FileInfo.C
> FileInfo.C: In method `time_t & FileInfo::getModificationTime()':
> FileInfo.C:287: warning: initializing non-const `time_t &' with `long unsigned int'
>will use a temporary
> FileIn
53 matches
Mail list logo
