Re: Beta 2?

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 08:33:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The level of warnings is now much mower, but I still see some about the > deprecation of std::unary_fonction and std::binary_function. We could either > backport the 4 patches below or keep things as they are, since the functor

Re: Beta 2?

Le 10/01/2023 à 22:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Right. Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings these days. So, I upgraded boost to 1.81 (latest) in master and 1.75 in stabl

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 13:44 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Please produce binaries. > > Riki I build it for several architectures and base OS, Fedora and RHEL compatible. I will probably ignore RHEL-7 because it is becoming too

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Got it thanks. On 1/11/23 19:22, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 11.01.2023 um 19:44 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : Here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Please produce binaries. I’ve built the binaries for Mac and put them here: https://my.hidrive.com/share/ydfg5l8ppq * build on B

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Mi., 11. Jan. 2023 um 19:45 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Please produce binaries. Done and uploaded to google drive. -- Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-d

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On 1/12/23 05:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 11/01/2023 à 19:44, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Please produce binaries. What git commit is this? Not a 2022-12-11 version as configure.ac says, I guess, but tagging it may be useful.

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:44:37PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Here: > >     http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Seems to work on debian stable. P -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Le 11/01/2023 à 19:44, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Here:     http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ Please produce binaries. What git commit is this? Not a 2022-12-11 version as configure.ac says, I guess, but tagging it may be useful. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lis

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am 11.01.2023 um 19:44 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > Please produce binaries. I’ve built the binaries for Mac and put them here: https://my.hidrive.com/share/ydfg5l8ppq * build on BigSur for Intel and Apple chips (minimum macOS

Re: Beta 2?

On 1/10/23 16:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Right. Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings these days. I'll build beta 2 in the next couple days. When that's done, then we can

Re: Beta 2?

Right. Something I will ask for soon is permission for upgrading included boost on devel and stable. It is not possible to build stable without lots of warnings these days. JMarc Le 10 janvier 2023 21:50:06 GMT+01:00, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >Seem like a good time to do beta 2? > >R

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Fr., 16. Dez. 2022 um 00:46 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@gmail.com>: > On 12/15/22 13:25, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Do., 15. Dez. 2022 um 06:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin >: > >> Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : >> >>> So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work?

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On 12/15/22 13:25, Yu Jin wrote: Am Do., 15. Dez. 2022 um 06:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work? Yes Actually, if you are going to make these again, can you please include the atta

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Do., 15. Dez. 2022 um 06:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > >> So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work? >> >> >> Yes > Actually, if you are going to make these again, can you please include the attached patch? It fixes the QtZlib issue w

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Mi., 14. Dez. 2022 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > So it's just 2.3.7 that doesn't work? > > > Yes -- Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On 12/14/22 01:40, Yu Jin wrote: Am Di., 13. Dez. 2022 um 17:45 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : On 12/12/22 04:01, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: >

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:20:42 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:45:32AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 12/12/22 04:01, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 > > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:45:32AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 12/12/22 04:01, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -05

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:45:32 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 12/12/22 04:01, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500,

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Di., 13. Dez. 2022 um 17:45 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@gmail.com>: > On 12/12/22 04:01, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On 12/12/22 04:01, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Tarballs for beta 2 are at: http://www.frege.org/transfer/

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

Am Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:14:47 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > > > > > http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > > > > > > Let's

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > > > http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > > > > Let's test these a bit before proceeding to binaries. (Also, of course, we > > have

Re: Beta 2 Tarballs

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Tarballs for beta 2 are at: > > http://www.frege.org/transfer/ > > Let's test these a bit before proceeding to binaries. (Also, of course, we > have 2.3.7 to deal with.) On a first sight seem to work as well... P -- lyx-de

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:50:23PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: >> >>> Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the >>> problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Typically -j3 is a better choice than -j2 on dual core machines, as not everything is processor-bound. Sure, maybe the reason. Note that multiple concurrent processes intensively accessing one res

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > Typically -j3 is a better choice than -j2 on dual core machines, as not > > everything is processor-bound. > > Sure, maybe the reason. Note that multiple concurrent processes intensively > accessing one resource (say memory or

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >> > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > writes: >> > >> >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now >> >> renamed to note that it's explicitly

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed > >> to note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > > > Note that compil

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Le 6 juin 08 à 23:12, Alfredo Braunstein a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core machines. faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Yes, it is a bit faster. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Alfredo Braunstein wrote: José Matos wrote: On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. Good to know... I wonder why. My understanding is that launching 2 compilat

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> faster than -j2 or was it a typo? > > Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. Good to know... I wonder why. A/

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Friday 06 June 2008 22:12:40 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > faster than -j2 or was it a typo? Usually, yes. I use even -j4 on the desktop dual core. > A/ -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed >> to note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core > machines. faster than -j2 or wa

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed > to > > note that it's explicitly for Mac). > > Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much fa

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

"Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, that indeed works. I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed to > note that it's explicitly for Mac). Note that compiling with "make -j3" is much faster on double core machines. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: I'm attaching the corrected script (now renamed to note that it's explicitly for Mac). Thanks for the cleaning-up! I would suggest the follwing changes (see attached): 1) The HostSystemIntel and HostSystemPPC variables should NOT be changed ever as long as we support 10.4

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure reported some errors. I

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 13:53:39 Pavel Sanda wrote: > for example today is so beautiful sunny day that i can even smell beta3 in > the air don't you think? :)) > pavel I do. :-) I will expand this in a new thread. -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 14:17:56 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > 2) sounds good as it also convey the information as a "mini-freeze". > > +1 Fair enough. I will try this for the next release. :-) > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Te

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When >> executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure rep

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Btw there's one more mall quirk: When opening a new document the top line > is partly hidden by the toolbar, i.e. the crolling i wrong. I think I > remember this being mentioned before, but can't find it in bugzilla. > ht

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On 3 jun 2008, at 18.20, Bennett Helm wrote: - In the tutorial there are some button-figures missing I don't see this. Is it just that the graphics aren't displaying for you? Strange, now it works... Before some figures where replaced by black squares, but now it's fine. Anyway no big deal

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. I copied the attached script section by section into Terminal. When > executing or source'ing the script, for some reason configure reported some > errors. > It seems there were some stray invisible characters in th

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 jun 2008, at 16.15, Bennett Helm wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> Bennett Helm wrote: >>> >>> I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. >>>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On 3 jun 2008, at 16.15, Bennett Helm wrote: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Bennett Helm wrote: I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? Yes. I've posted a Mac package here:

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > >> Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: >> >> LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..> < >> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Universal.dmg> >> >> Konrad and Anders, could you both test it -- r

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..> Konrad and Anders, could you both test it -- running the installer as well -- to see if it works for you? Works fine here on Intel Mac OS

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: > If so, that means that you can (and should) build the release > version yourself again, right? > > > Yes, at least to the "can" part. ... And "should" because of the following reason. > That might also solve the crash occurring with George. > > > I hope so. I'm

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett Helm wrote: > >> I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. >> > > Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? Yes. I've posted a Mac package here: LyX-1.6.0b2-Mac-Univ..>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Bennett Helm wrote: I can now confirm that it also works on PPC-10.4. Good. That was with the version that YOU built on 10.5? If so, that means that you can (and should) build the release version yourself again, right? That might also solve the crash occurring with George. /Konrad

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Bennett, Anders, >> >> please find at >> >> a universal binary built

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 2) change the configure.ac to the release tag, and works for some >> days in that state before reverting to svn after tagging the >> release. > > 2) sounds good as it also convey the information as a "mini-freeze". +1 JMarc

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> Would it be worth to release beta 3 with this problem fixed or should we >>> publically announce beta 2 remarking the known problems? >>> >> >> i would vote for beta 3 if you are able to prepare it very soon. >> otherwise next development bring new bugs we will ne

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Pavel Sanda wrote: José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:40:10 Pavel Sanda wrote: José Matos wrote: The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the developers list. ok, and what do you plan now :) ? pavel The only glaring remaining

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:40:10 Pavel Sanda wrote: > > José Matos wrote: > > > The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the > > > developers list. > > > > ok, and what do you plan now :) ? > > pavel > > The only glaring remaining problem was the updat

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 03 June 2008 13:05:58 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: OK, so what you could have tried is to package some rX revision, let people try it, and tag beta2 from it if there are no brown paper bag issues. OK, the only issue is that the default options change if

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:40:10 Pavel Sanda wrote: > José Matos wrote: > > The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the > > developers list. > > ok, and what do you plan now :) ? > pavel The only glaring remaining problem was the update problem from lyx2lyx. This was fi

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 13:05:58 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > OK, so what you could have tried is to package some rX revision, > let people try it, and tag beta2 from it if there are no brown paper > bag issues. OK, the only issue is that the default options change if we are using a beta or

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 02 June 2008 17:39:34 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> In the future, I think you should tag a betaXrc1 before tagging >> betaX, as stupid as it may seem (or just package a particular svn >> revision). > > In the past we have never announced beta

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: > The green light will be given based on the feedback that we get in the > developers list. ok, and what do you plan now :) ? pavel

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 01:10:49 Pavel Sanda wrote: > no, this means that it is ok to build beta2 wininstaller and announce it on > _devel_ list even before the green light. Yes. > with annoucements for users should arch builders wait for green light from > Jose (which is the message in the annou

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 11:40:10 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, as far as possible (in particular for bugs that affect all > architectures). Architecture dependent fixes are acceptable. > > JMarc Yes and yes. :-) -- José Abílio

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Monday 02 June 2008 17:39:34 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > In the future, I think you should tag a betaXrc1 before tagging > betaX, as stupid as it may seem (or just package a particular svn > revision). In the past we have never announced beta versions in the users list. This sort of announ

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But in any case: I assume the arch builds should be based on José's > official tar-balls, without any additional patches applied (or > otherwise be termed 1.6.0svnx), correct? Yes, as far as possible (in particular for bugs that affect all archite

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). Windows binaries are available at http://www.lyx.org/~joost/ Joost

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Same result her on PPC 10.4. Could the UserGuide-problems be due to: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3938 Anders On 2 jun 2008, at 23.02, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: José Matos wrote: as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:45:47PM +0200, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > This is due to the fact that in the user guide the symbol '·' is used rather than the macro \cdot, and there was a bug in the recent support for unicode symbols in math. Now '·' gets translated to \cdot

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi all, > as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that > appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). > > As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that there > are no > embarrassin

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:33:53AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:16:48AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> >>> rgheck wrote: >>> Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: >>

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bennett, Anders, > > please find at > > a universal binary built on Mac OS X 10.4.11 from lyx-1.6.0beta2.tar.gz, > and using the attached script. > >

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:45:47PM +0200, Konrad Hofbauer wrote: > Should the UserGuide compile in beta2? > > I just built on Mac and get a Latex error: > > ! Undefined control sequence. > > l.4078 ...ecause $sin$ does normally mean $s\cdoti > > \

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Note that an announcement in the devel list for binary packages for beta > 2 is reasonable since > > anyone reading your message will have seen this message before. > > I don't understand what you mean by this. Should I also CC the devel-list > when announcing a Windows binar

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:16:48AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: rgheck wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appear

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:16:48AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > rgheck wrote: >> Andre Poenitz wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: >>> Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> I find the "reorganization" behaviour after creating an empty >> doc/loading an existing one etc mildly confusing. The document >> gets redrawn twice, the first time partially hidden by the tool >> bar, the second time correctly, but with ~ 0.5 s delay. >> > > Right,

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

rgheck wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guaran

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

Andre Poenitz wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:00:16PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the > problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta > 2). > > As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that > there are no

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). Bennett, Anders, please find at a universal binary built on Mac OS X 10.4.1

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: So let us please test this release and when there is some confidence in the release tar ball let us announce this also in the users list. Should the UserGuide compile in beta2? I just built on Mac and get a Latex error: ! Undefined control sequence. l.4078 ...ecause $sin$ d

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

> Uwe please do not announce a win package in the users list before we > have a green light from all the involved platforms. OK, I'll wait until you give the green light. Beta 2 compiles well on Windows btw. > Note that an announcement in the devel list for binary packages for beta 2 is reason

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos wrote: Hi all, as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that there are no embarrassing bugs. I mean in this case a failure to compil

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:00 PM, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, >as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems > that > appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). > >As it happened previously I am asking for help to guarantee that

Re: Beta 2 (private announcement)

José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > as discussed during the weekend and in order to fix the problems that > appeared with beta 1 I have tagged a new release (beta 2). In the future, I think you should tag a betaXrc1 before tagging betaX, as stupid as it may seem (or just pac

Re: Beta 2 someday?

> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: christian> Or one of these, but much bigger... christian> http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20070418 Yes, this is what I had in mind actually. JMarc

Re: Beta 2 someday?

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Can I have beer too? Georg> You are most welcome. Do you need one now? Unfortunately I Georg> don't have a beer teleporter ;-) A beer thrower could do, if y

Re: Beta 2 someday?

> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Can I have beer too? Georg> You are most welcome. Do you need one now? Unfortunately I Georg> don't have a beer teleporter ;-) A beer thrower could do, if you have one of those Pershing missiles ramps s

Re: Beta 2 someday?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Can I have beer too? You are most welcome. Do you need one now? Unfortunately I don't have a beer teleporter ;-) Georg

Re: Beta 2 someday?

> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Stable branches are only doable when they are stable. Abdelrazak> Are you taking back the job? Whoever will maintain the so Abdelrazak> called "stable branch" will decide how to process. I leave Abdelrazak> that decision to yo

Re: Beta 2 someday?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Michael Gerz wrote: Georg Baum schrieb: On the scrollbar issue, what can I say? I more or less know what needs to be done but I cannot do that without further cleanup. I'll promise to do some

Re: Beta 2 someday?

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> since I will only have little spare time during the next months Georg> I decided to stop any further work on LyX 1.5svn: I don't want Georg> to help with a release that I cannot endorse.

Re: Beta 2 someday?

> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> since I will only have little spare time during the next months Georg> I decided to stop any further work on LyX 1.5svn: I don't want Georg> to help with a release that I cannot endorse. That is too bad. Unfortunately, I see a trend h

Re: Beta 2 someday?

> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Michael Gerz wrote: >> Georg Baum schrieb: On the scrollbar issue, what can I say? I more or less know what needs to be done but I cannot do that without further cleanup. I'll promise to do something for

Re: Beta 2 (before public announce)

On Sunday 22 April 2007 4:56:17 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > José> I would appreciate if either Jean-Marc or Lars could copy them > José> to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/ > > The files are transferred now. Thank you. :

Re: Beta 2 (before public announce)

> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> I would appreciate if either Jean-Marc or Lars could copy them José> to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/pre/ The files are transferred now. Note however that beta1.gz is smaller than beta2.gz, but the opposite is true for the bz2 form

Re: Beta 2 (before public announce)

Neal Becker wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: José Matos wrote: On Sunday 22 April 2007 12:06:38 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Do you have a better recipe? because I cannot reproduce here... Funny, it gets even better, because it is a display problem, if you return to the formula the result

  1   2   3   >