Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 30 September 2002 3:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> dns stuff.
>>
>> baywatch had to change its ip address.
| aleem@thorax:devel$ ping baywatch.lyx.org
| PING baywatch.lyx.org (213.203.58.29): 56 data bytes
>
| I take it that this is the
On Monday 30 September 2002 3:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> dns stuff.
>
> baywatch had to change its ip address.
aleem@thorax:devel$ ping baywatch.lyx.org
PING baywatch.lyx.org (213.203.58.29): 56 data bytes
I take it that this is the old address and that all will
therefore be fine once t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 30 September 2002 2:30 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | I meant to reach a point where we can release something. I'm
>> | being realistics - who is going to look at, for example, the
>> | totally fubared accent code on Qt ? Who knows how to
On Monday 30 September 2002 2:30 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I meant to reach a point where we can release something. I'm
> | being realistics - who is going to look at, for example, the
> | totally fubared accent code on Qt ? Who knows how to solve
> | the font problems that bother Lars ?
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:51:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> > Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support.
>> > I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the gui not
>> > working at all, but it is ok if the su
John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 07:18:16PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Perhaps having a tabular toolbar for the common tasks, will make it
> > possible to change the tabular dialog without a big decrease in its
> > usability.
> As long as you can still do everything via the dialog, th
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 07:18:16PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Perhaps having a tabular toolbar for the common tasks, will make it possible
> to change the tabular dialog without a big decrease in its usability.
As long as you can still do everything via the dialog, then yes.
regards
john
--
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:06:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Personally, I think it would be a good idea to start afresh,
> define a TabularParams struct and use the same machinary and
> approach as all the other dialogs.
>
> First though I'd have to win the flame war that this suggestion
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:51:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support.
> > I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the gui not
> > working at all, but it is ok if the support is not super nice.
>
> Was "Christmas"
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:06:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Unfortunately, the Tabular dialog is different to every single
> other dialog in that changes made to it are registered
> immediately. Ie, there's no "Apply" or "Ok" button.
>
> The result is extremely complex code.
Not in Qt.
On Friday 27 September 2002 1:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Nah. You get my vote as long as you keep moving...
I've already volunteered to do the Label dialog...
Angus
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | (a) put 1.3 out without full Qt support
>>
>> Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support.
>> I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:06:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > * Ed's working on the Document dialog.
> > > * Nobody is working on the Preferences or Tabular dialogs.
> >
> > They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they?
>
> We should start with the Tabular dialog. People can always
> modif
On Friday 27 September 2002 1:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > * Ed's working on the Document dialog.
> > * Nobody is working on the Preferences or Tabular dialogs.
>
> They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they?
We should start wit
> They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they?
yes
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * Ed's working on the Document dialog.
> * Nobody is working on the Preferences or Tabular dialogs.
They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not ha
> Was "Christmas" for "full" or "complete" support? John?
complete, I would think. Unless people step in to implement the preferences
and tabular dialogs.
On Friday 27 September 2002 12:46 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I think there was no conclusion.
> |
> | John told us that he probably can't finish before Christmas,
> | nobody was willing/able to help out and Lars said that
> | Christmas is too lat
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | (a) put 1.3 out without full Qt support
>
> Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support.
> I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the gui not
> working at all, but it is ok if the su
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think there was no conclusion.
>
| John told us that he probably can't finish before Christmas, nobody was
| willing/able to help out and Lars said that Christmas is too late.
>
| So how is this to be resolved?
>
| (a) put 1.3 out without full Qt sup
20 matches
Mail list logo
