On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:11:49AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | wanting a rock to wind a piece of string around,
>
> That is a reference I do not get...
It was in reference to his signature ...
http://www.letssingit.com/they-might-be-giants-w
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| wanting a rock to wind a piece of string around,
That is a reference I do not get...
--
Lgb
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:40:10PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote:
> In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the
> text as "verbatim", even though in 122, the doc was saved with the
> included text as "included".
Thanks, fixed in my tree.
wanting a rock to wind a piece of st
> "Peter" == Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Hi, I picked up xforms 1.0rc4 from
Peter> ftp.lyx.org/pub/xforms/OpenSource/ and built it with an install
Peter> directory of /usr/local/xforms. I ran "xmkmf -a" and then make.
Peter> Mostly this went well except when the make tried to li
Hi,
I picked up xforms 1.0rc4 from ftp.lyx.org/pub/xforms/OpenSource/ and
built it with an install directory of /usr/local/xforms. I ran "xmkmf -a"
and then make. Mostly this went well except when the make tried to
link fdesign it couldn't find the X libraries. I patched the
fdesign/Makefile with
> "Peter" == Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Hello, The xforms I have is version 0.89, but I don't recall
Peter> for which libc it was. It is the same one that I used for
Peter> succesfully building lyx-1.1.6fix4 on the same computer though
Peter> so I'd guess that it is OK for my s
Hello,
The xforms I have is version 0.89, but I don't recall for which libc
it was. It is the same one that I used for succesfully building
lyx-1.1.6fix4 on the same computer though so I'd guess that it is OK
for my system.
I'm more curious about the unresolved reference to "__setjmp". This
soun
> "Peter" == Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Hello, The 1.2.0 lyx binary fails to link on my RedHat 7.3
Peter> system (with all updates from RedHat installed). See below for
Peter> output.
Peter> The source is straight 1.2.0, and the xforms is 0.89 (the very
Peter> same which I use
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:39:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel> wrote:
>> Yes, we then should use one of the functions Dekel had instead.
>> Dekel do you still have them?
Dekel> Attached.
Thanks, I applied your patch. I am not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Do we really need to use difftime? Isn't there another way to tell
| that a file is newer than another one??
But difftime must exist, it is Ansi C.
My guess is that the :: should be removed and a using std::difftime
added.
Or perhaps the using
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Thursday 30 May 2002 5:15 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Thomas> When I manually add "-I$(top_srcdir)/src/cheaders" to CPPFLAGS
Thomas> in src/insets/Makefile (configure decided to put
Thomas> "lyx_cv_cxx_cheaders=yes" in confi
On Thursday 30 May 2002 5:15 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thomas> When I manually add "-I$(top_srcdir)/src/cheaders" to CPPFLAGS
> Thomas> in src/insets/Makefile (configure decided to put
> Thomas> "lyx_cv_cxx_cheaders=yes" in config.cache), I get conflicts:
>
> This is only needed for cxx <6
> "Thomas" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Going further:
Thomas> - --- snip --- /usr/bin/cxx -std strict_ansi -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Thomas> -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost
Thomas> -I/net/usr/include -ptr /tmp/lyx_cxx_repository
Thomas> -I/net/usr/include -c
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:39:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yes, we then should use one of the functions Dekel had instead.
> Dekel do you still have them?
Attached.
Index: lyxstring.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Thomas" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Thomas> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Is
| Thomas> there a way around this? FWIW, linking also fails on a decent
| Thomas> Tru64 Unix 5.1A machine (ld 5.1 wh
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:43:55PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:40:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > This might be a bug then
>
> The good news is that MArtin has a patch waiting ...
>
> john
The better news is that in the tradition of collaborative developm
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:16:29PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg38327.html
>
> I am in the process of switching to a "if it's not on bugzilla, it's not a
> bug" policy...
It is on Bugzilla :)
john
--
"Time is a great teacher, bu
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:42:57PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> like the one this refers to.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg38327.html
I am in the process of switching to a "if it's not on bugzilla, it's not a
bug" policy...
Andre', who changes his mind fro
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:55:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
>
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:03:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Andre> wrote: I've added the missing
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:29:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Lars> QuI then.
>> | QuI?
>> hmm... QoI then.
>
| QoI?
Quality of Implementation.
>> | Lars> No reason to parse prepropressor
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:03:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: I've added the missing 'usings' right now.
>> Can you do it in the 1.2.x branch too?
Andre> Do I need a seperately checked out branch for that?
Yes. If
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:29:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Lars> QuI then.
> | QuI?
> hmm... QoI then.
QoI?
> | Lars> No reason to parse prepropressor symbols inside
> | Lars> #if 0 ... #endif
> | Note that it only outputs a warnin
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:03:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I've added the missing 'usings' right now.
>
> Can you do it in the 1.2.x branch too?
Do I need a seperately checked out branch for that?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
wil
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> QuI then.
>
| QuI?
hmm... QoI then.
| Lars> No reason to parse prepropressor symbols inside
>
| Lars> #if 0 ... #endif
>
| Note that it only outputs a warning, not an erro
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> QuI then.
QuI?
Lars> No reason to parse prepropressor symbols inside
Lars> #if 0 ... #endif
Note that it only outputs a warning, not an error. So it is somehow
useful. And this warning can be shut off if you know its number
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:05:45PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
>> src/mathed/math_xdata.C:214 (std::abs),
>> src/mathed/math_charinset.C:52 (std::isalpha),
>> src/mathed/math_cursor.C:1465,1549,1554 (std::isalpha),
>> src/mathed/ma
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:05:45PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> src/mathed/math_xdata.C:214 (std::abs), src/mathed/math_charinset.C:52
> (std::isalpha), src/mathed/math_cursor.C:1465,1549,1554 (std::isalpha),
> src/mathed/math_mathmlstream.C:233 (std::strlen),
> src/mathed/math_parser.C:781,897,9
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | cxx: Error: formulabase.C, line 367: identifier "abs" is undefined
> | if (abs(x - first_x) < 2 && abs(y - first_y) < 2) {
> | ^
>
> I belive that abs as a macro is not allowed in C++.
> Also it might be that you compiler (correctly) puts abs in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> mmm... note that f.ex. gcc will then complain if abs is not in
| Lars> std:: (no such symbol in namespace std)
>
| Lars> So we will have to guard that "using".
>
| No. The u
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> mmm... note that f.ex. gcc will then complain if abs is not in
Lars> std:: (no such symbol in namespace std)
Lars> So we will have to guard that "using".
No. The using works fine with cxx.
>>> | cxx: Warning: formulabase.C,
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:53:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | The 'using std::abs; ' is missing.
>>
>> mmm... note that f.ex. gcc will then complain if abs is not in std::
>> (no such symbol in namespace std)
>
| g++ 2.95 doe not complain,
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:53:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | The 'using std::abs; ' is missing.
>
> mmm... note that f.ex. gcc will then complain if abs is not in std::
> (no such symbol in namespace std)
g++ 2.95 doe not complain, i.e. it compiles for me.
Andre'
--
Those who desi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> | cxx: Error: formulabase.C, line 367: identifier "abs" is undefined
>> | if (abs(x - first_x) < 2 && abs(y - first_y) < 2) {
>> | ^
>>
>> I belive that ab
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> | cxx: Error: formulabase.C, line 367: identifier "abs" is undefined
> | if (abs(x - first_x) < 2 && abs(y - first_y) < 2) {
> | ^
>
> I belive that abs as a macro is not allowed in C++.
Indeed.
> Als
Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> o It is possible to compile lyx with Tru64 Unix cxx compiler
>> version 6.2, provided one uses
>> CXX='cxx -std strict_ansi'
>> CXXFLAGS='-ptr /tmp/lyx_cxx_repository -g'
>> CC=cc
>
| Bad promise. Stil
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> o It is possible to compile lyx with Tru64 Unix cxx compiler
> version 6.2, provided one uses
> CXX='cxx -std strict_ansi'
> CXXFLAGS='-ptr /tmp/lyx_cxx_repository -g'
> CC=cc
Bad promise. Still doesn't compile cleanly (Tru64 5.0A PK3, latest
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Does that also turn on __USE_STD_IOSTREAM?
Yes, it does.
Lars> If not we should turn that on for this compiler, btw. how to
Lars> test and do this?
I think it is unnecessary. Basically, the command line I use to
compile is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Thomas" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Thomas> Angus Leeming wrote:
>>> These were work arounds for cxx 6.2 that comes with Tru64 Unix
>>> 4.0e. If you're using a 5.1 system then the cxx compiler should be
>>> more than ca
> "Thomas" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Is there a way around this? FWIW,
Thomas> linking also fails on a decent Tru64 Unix 5.1A machine (ld 5.1
Thomas> while 4.0D has ld 3.11).
>> As I said, --with-included-string helps.
Thomas> Has this c
> "Thomas" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> These were work arounds for cxx 6.2 that comes with Tru64 Unix
>> 4.0e. If you're using a 5.1 system then the cxx compiler should be
>> more than capable of compiling LyX unmodified. Any errors it throws
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> These were work arounds for cxx 6.2 that comes with Tru64 Unix 4.0e. If
> you're using a 5.1 system then the cxx compiler should be more than capable
> of compiling LyX unmodified. Any errors it throws up will almost
> certainly be genuine LyX bugs which should be reported t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thomas> Is there a way around this? FWIW, linking also fails on a
> Thomas> decent Tru64 Unix 5.1A machine (ld 5.1 while 4.0D has ld
> Thomas> 3.11).
>
> As I said, --with-included-string helps.
Has this changed recently? As reported for 1.2.0pre5 on 2002-05-21,
lin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thomas> As for Lars' suggestion: how do I turn off all debug info
> Thomas> cleanly?
>
> --disable-debug.
Isn't this the default (at least for a release)? "./configure --help"
only lists --enable-debug. If it's not the default, configure's output
is ... misleading.
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:52:18PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>Is there a way around this? FWIW, linking also fails on a
> >>decent Tru64 Unix 5.1A machine (ld 5.1 while 4.0D has ld 3.11).
> >
> >So, you can now compile with cxx? Only gcc dies?
>
> No, I didn't say that
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> Does it also crash if you turn off all debug info?
>>
Lars> | I think the problem with stl and
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:25:00PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bj?nnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >Lars> Does it also crash if you turn off all debug info?
> >
> >I think the problem with stl and du 4.0d is that the linker
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Lars> Does it also crash if you turn off all debug info?
>
> I think the problem with stl and du 4.0d is that the linker does not
> support obcenely long symbol names.
Is there a way around thi
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Does it also crash if you turn off all debug info?
I think the problem with stl and du 4.0d is that the linker does not
support obcenely long symbol names.
JMarc
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:52:53PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> thanks for releasing LyX 1.2.0.
>>
>> I successfully compiled it on SuSE Linux 6.2 (i686) and Sun Solaris 2.6
>> (SPARC) with gcc 3.1.
>>
>> However, compilation fails on
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:52:53PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for releasing LyX 1.2.0.
>
> I successfully compiled it on SuSE Linux 6.2 (i686) and Sun Solaris 2.6
> (SPARC) with gcc 3.1.
>
> However, compilation fails on Tru64 Unix 4.0D (Alpha) with gcc 3.1
> at the final l
> "Thomas" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Hello, thanks for releasing LyX 1.2.0.
Thomas> I successfully compiled it on SuSE Linux 6.2 (i686) and Sun
Thomas> Solaris 2.6 (SPARC) with gcc 3.1.
Thomas> However, compilation fails on Tru64 Unix 4.0D (Alpha) with gcc
Thomas>
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I am fairly convinced that we would have a better CVS version today if we
>| had just kept moving as in the months before the freeze had there been not
>| that goal of a "perfect 1.2" hanging around. Basically we wasted three
>| months of time to gain
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:44:46PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have a couple of patches from Jürgen that I want in.
>
> But IMHO we are there now, but of course IMHO we have been there for
> weeks...
Put them in, wait three days, release it.
And if Juergen's patches break anything, hi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Could we get that beast out the door _now_ _or_ revoke the freeze?
>
| If necessary, declare 1.2 "unstable and broken" (we know it is not, but
| it is not perfect either...)
>
| We have not had real progress for three months or so, and quite a few
| "
John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:44:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
>>I also see that those of you that see this has done almost no
>>debugging.
>>
>
> Well we just assumed everyone could see it.
>
>
>>lyx -dbg depend should at the least be run.
>>
>
> What I did :
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:44:27AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I also see that those of you that see this has done almost no
> debugging.
Well we just assumed everyone could see it.
> lyx -dbg depend should at the least be run.
What I did :
New doc.
type "blah"
view->dvi
type another
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:19:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | 2. update->dvi is useless (bug 349)
>>
>> I cannot reproduce this.
>> "Works for me"
>
| I can reproduce it (I sent files earli
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:19:04AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | 2. update->dvi is useless (bug 349)
>
> I cannot reproduce this.
> "Works for me"
I can reproduce it (I sent files earlier) as can at least a couple of others.
Basically, from sc
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 2. update->dvi is useless (bug 349)
I cannot reproduce this.
"Works for me"
--
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> You are talking about the user preamble, right?
Yes. The former way to do things was:
[lyx preamble]
\usepackage{babel}
[userpreamble]
\begin{document}
So some packages like cite.sty could not possibly be made to work.
The
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Moritz" == Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Moritz> Hi there, I reported them in bugzilla(315,316), but got no
| Moritz> feedback yet. Maybe someone here can tell me if these bugs are
| Moritz> going to be fixed?
>
|
> "Moritz" == Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Moritz> Hi there, I reported them in bugzilla(315,316), but got no
Moritz> feedback yet. Maybe someone here can tell me if these bugs are
Moritz> going to be fixed?
Moritz> 1 bug: \usepackage{babel} is inserted after the latex
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi there, I reported them in bugzilla(315,316), but got no feedback yet. Maybe
| someone here can tell me if these bugs are going to be fixed?
>
| 1 bug:
| \usepackage{babel} is inserted after the latex preamble. This is of course
| wrong,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> - X Window problems
is this using insetgraphics ?
> Yes, they exist even with Xform 0.89.6. I get messages about
> "BadDrawable"
this is bddd. I get BadWindow trying to add an eps in a insetgraphics
> and "Receiv
Hello,
just a few comments: I don't think that the current code is that
unstable. I am using it for my daily work and while there are still some
rough edges, stability is not the primary problem any more.
IMHO releasing an interim 1.1.7 (with coloured warnings printed all over
the screen) is
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 05:24:01PM +, John Levon wrote:
> 1.2.0 will /never/ arrive then. If people don't have time to fix the 6 or so
> really critical bugs why on earth do you think people will have time to debug
> an entirely new architecture ??
Those people that cannot contribute to the o
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 08:35:33AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> enough time to fix it I would suggest to scrap the plans to have a stable
> release 'soon' and go straight on to the structural changes originally
> postponed to some time 'after 1.2.0'.
>
> The hope is that fixing the structure gi
On Friday 15 February 2002 10:28, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > How 'stable' would that actually be?
>
> Sufficient for people with a thick skin I'd say...
>
> Andre'
I am using the lyx-devel branch for my today work and it it 'stable'
On Friday 15 February 2002 12:27 pm, Jean-Marc wrote:
> I don't know, really. Juergen is the only one who could tell us how
> easy fixing this could be. I took a look at it, hoping to find an easy
> thing, and obviously failed.
Which seems to me another strong argument in favor of Andre's proposa
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> When is juergen supposed to come back? I think he has had enough
> vacation and should go back to real useful work.
I think his boss will agree on that ;-(
> I don't know, really. Juergen is the only one who could tell us h
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Hi folks, it's Friday, isn't it?
Andre> From what I hear current CVS is still much more unstable than
Andre> 1.1.6fix4, frequent non-reproducable crashs in Undo, lately
Andre> scrollbars get stuck etc.
Andre> Given that none of t
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> How 'stable' would that actually be?
Sufficient for people with a thick skin I'd say...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:03:58AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:54:30AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Did I say that we need a stable release again, like yesterday? So if you
> > want to open up Pandor^W development again, do it *only* for things
> > that are dire
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:54:30AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Did I say that we need a stable release again, like yesterday? So if you
> want to open up Pandor^W development again, do it *only* for things
> that are directly relevant to Undo and other things that are known to
> cause us grie
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 08:35:33AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Hi folks,
> it's Friday, isn't it?
>
> From what I hear current CVS is still much more unstable than 1.1.6fix4,
> frequent non-reproducable crashs in Undo, lately scrollbars get stuck etc.
>
> Given that none of the people who u
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:04:54PM +, John Levon wrote:
> a crash can happen without the patch. In what way is this not a critical bug ?
This is not clear from the bug description.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:11:18PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> a crash can happen without the patch. In what way is this not a
> John> critical bug ?
>
> What about discussing and applying the patch? Is the crash fixed with
> the patch?
You'd have to ask Michael to test it - it's
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:15:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John> wrote:
>> | I believe 'cri' for #143 is too harsh.
>>
>> agree.
John> a crash can happen without the patch. In what way is this not a
John> critical bug ?
What about
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:15:18PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I believe 'cri' for #143 is too harsh.
>
> agree.
a crash can happen without the patch. In what way is this not a critical bug ?
john
--
"Mathemeticians stand on each other's shoulders while computer scientists
stand o
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I believe 'cri' for
Lars> #143 is too harsh.
Lars> agree.
And what about the patch?
Basically, it looks good to me, although getFontSettings should
be renamed to something else. It
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:48:26AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> no, each percentage is the percentage total number of samples
> John> registered against code found in that routine (I think libbfd
> John> attempts to locate inlined functions properly too though).
>
> Is that from op
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:10:04PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> How does one read this output? Do these include the time for the
>> childs?
John> no, each percentage is the percentage total number of samples
John> regist
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:10:04PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> How does one read this output? Do these include the time for the
> childs?
no, each percentage is the percentage total number of samples registered
against code found in that routine (I think libbfd attempts to locate inlin
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:24:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John> wrote:
>> No, but with your profile it look as if it is the containers and
>> tools that create the overhead. With -O2 the case is completely
>> different, and "real" l
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Would it be possible to see the book? I wonder what needs so much
>> convertion time... Would be a good candidate for profiling. Also,
>> were your two versions compiled with the same optimization level?
Herbert> I have no idea about
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> Herbert> a book of 298 pages written with 1.1.6 and a filesize of 1.9
> Herbert> MegaBytes - loading in 1.1.6 takes about 6 seconds loading
> Herbert> with converting into 1.2.0 takes more than 3
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> a book of 298 pages written with 1.1.6 and a filesize of 1.9
Herbert> MegaBytes - loading in 1.1.6 takes about 6 seconds loading
Herbert> with converting into 1.2.0 takes more than 3 minutes!
Herbert> (Display Graphics was disab
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:24:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John> wrote:
>> No, but with your profile it look as if it is the containers and
>> tools that create the overhead. With -O2 the case is completely
>> different, and "real" l
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | - in 1.1.6 there is often a construct like
> >
> |latex latex
> >
> |latex default
>
> it is the user that has put this contruct there.
Not me. I have seen this also when importing 1.1.6 docs
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:24:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No, but with your profile it look as if it is the containers and tools
> that create the overhead. With -O2 the case is completely different,
> and "real" lyx code begin to show up.
OK, that's a good point ...
I get :
Buffe
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 06:50:42PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | here is from my 100+ page document, mostly text + figures (not rendered).
> | It is fine ... perhaps it is a mathed thing :
>
> _and_ it makes little sense to do probiling on a binary that has not
> been compiled with full
John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
>>| a book of 298 pages written with 1.1.6 and a filesize of 1.9 MegaBytes
>>
>
> lots of math ?
yes: math, floats, tables, ERT, special formatting, ...
Herbert
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:38:28PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I think that this patch is wrong: The old code of insertErtContents is
> | correct, but the problem is that the wrong font is passed to it when the
> | method is called.
>
> I am not sure that I agree.
>
> | Consider the at
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | a book of 298 pages written with 1.1.6 and a filesize of 1.9 MegaBytes
lots of math ?
> I guess that we will need to run a profiler to find out where we use
> all that extra time. (both above cases)
here is from my 100+ p
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >>Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
> >>@@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
> >> void Buffer::insertErtC
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
>>@@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
>> void Buffer::insertErtContents(Paragraph * par, int & pos,
>>-
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
> @@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
> void Buffer::insertErtContents(Paragraph * par, int & pos,
> - Ly
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
>
> @@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
>
> #ifndef NO_COMPABILITY
> void Buffer::insertErtContents(Paragraph * par, int & pos,
> - LyXFont con
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | - in 1.1.6 there is often a construct like
>
> |latex latex
>
> |latex default
>
> it is the user that has put this contruct there.
sure
>
> |which is converted into an empty ERT. it's not really
>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:58:32PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg26025.html
thanks. now #451362 on sourceforge.
regards
john
--
"Not to laugh, not to lament, not to curse, but to understand."
- Spinoza
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
