On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I am fairly convinced that we would have a better CVS version today if we
>| had just kept moving as in the months before the freeze had there been not
>| that goal of a "perfect 1.2" hanging around. Basically we wasted three
>| months of time to gain ... well... what exactly? A few annoyed developpers
>| is the biggest chunk I can see.
I would say IMO your partly right. A lot of the fixes I made where "real"
fixes which I would have done in 1.3.0 asup.
> I have a couple of patches from Jürgen that I want in.
>
> But IMHO we are there now, but of course IMHO we have been there for
> weeks...
That was my thinking always. We will have a 1.2.1 and maybe later "fix"
releases, but I think we did the right thing to fix at least the "worst"
of the "official" bugs BEFORE releasing 1.2.0.
Maybe I would not have spent that much effort in makeing 1.2.0 better
if I could have worked on a 1.3.0. Then maybe we would have things in
like in 1.1.6 which cannot be fixed in "fix" releases because the need
too much changes to the code.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Actually, what I'd like is a little toy spaceship!!
