Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-20 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:21:56PM +, John Levon wrote: > \cong (ERT) > \Diamond (ERT) > \Box (ERT) > \surd (ERT) The following patch should fix the above symbols, and make all symbols in mathed.lyx viewable. There is a slight problem with the \cong hack: \def\cong{\stackrel{_\sim}{=}} This

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-18 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:00:21AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > For me, the following are wrong currently : > > > > \psi (blank) > > \rightsquigarrow (blank) > > Does the attached patch helps for the above symbols? Yes. regards john

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-18 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:21:56PM +, John Levon wrote: > > For me, the following are wrong currently : > > \psi (blank) > \rightsquigarrow (blank) Does the attached patch helps for the above symbols? > \cong (ERT) > \Diamond (ERT) > \Box (ERT) > \surd (ERT) I'll check these symbols tomor

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-18 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:38:43PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > Did you check that _all_ the symbols shown correctly ? I have *never* had this in any frontend. > I tried these fonts once and I think I had some missing symbols > (perhaps \geq ?) For me, the following are wrong currently : \psi (b

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-18 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:24:32PM +, John Levon wrote: > > > ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/cm/ps-type1/bakoma/ttf/ > > > > Trying ... this won't fix using the symbol font case though. > > Actually, it does. With these fonts, and changing to use setFamily() not > setRawName(), every

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:44:21AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > There is a "Standard Symbols I" for Qt on RH-8.0, does that contain > the correct font? No, it does not have the symbols we need (checked with qfd) > | 3) provide an RPM of those tex ttf fonts for RH8.0 users (what is their >

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:12:54PM +, John Levon wrote: | | > It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt | > cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol : | | I have made a patch that works with Qt 3 on RH8.0. I'm buildi

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:12:54PM +, John Levon wrote: > It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt > cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol : I have made a patch that works with Qt 3 on RH8.0. I'm building Qt 2 frontend now with the patch. I think our bes

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:43:13PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Can you put the postscript fonts (cmsy10.pfb etc.) in .fonts ? > > It does not work. Actually, fc-cache find the fonts, but something weird goes on. > > ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/cm/ps-type1/bakoma/ttf/ > > Trying ..

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:22:12AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > Can you put the postscript fonts (cmsy10.pfb etc.) in .fonts ? It does not work. > ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/cm/ps-type1/bakoma/ttf/ Trying ... this won't fix using the symbol font case though. regards john -- "ALL t

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:12:54PM +, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:01:02AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt > cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol : > > if (qt_has_xft) { > + use_xcore_fo

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:01:02AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > font.setFamily("symbol") > instead of > font.setRawName("-*-symbol-...") It doesn't work. I believe the problem is Red Hat 8.0's setup - Qt cannot see normal X fonts at all, including symbol : if (qt_has_xft) { + use_x

Re: mathed symbols & fonts

2002-12-17 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:43:26PM +, John Levon wrote: > > ok Andre I see what's happening. Our attempt to set the symbol font is > failing (and all other fonts). So only the symbol font is mis-displayed, > as you mentioned that mathed assumes smymbol font is available. > > So mathed is beh

Re: mathed symbols

2001-09-03 Thread Jules Bean
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > | > | > Maybe this info should go in the INSTALL? > | > | Probably ;-} > > I am getting more and more reluctan

Re: mathed symbols

2001-09-02 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change... > > how much manual config does the user have to do to make this work? > > I don't know. I guess

Re: mathed symbols

2001-09-02 Thread Ronny Buchmann
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:53] wrote: > * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote: > > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > | > what do I need to do to get the new s

Re: mathed symbols

2001-08-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Currently, I get: > aleem> cd /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm > aleem> mkfontdir . > aleem> more fonts.dir > 0 > aleem> That's exactly what I get, so maybe we should simply wait for enlightenment. Or read some

Re: mathed symbols

2001-08-31 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote: > > I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change... > > how much manual config does the user have to do to make this wor

Re: mathed symbols

2001-08-31 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 31 August 2001 16:05, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed? > > Good question. I don't know ;-) > > > I have teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if

Re: mathed symbols

2001-08-31 Thread Ronny Buchmann
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > | > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed? > | > | Good question. I don't know ;-)

Re: mathed symbols

2001-08-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I am getting more and more reluctant to this symbol change... > how much manual config does the user have to do to make this work? I don't know. I guess it's about four or five lines mkdir $1 cd $1 somehow create fonts.dir #

Re: mathed symbols

2001-08-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed? Good question. I don't know ;-) > I have teTeX installed here. Do I need to download fonts and if so, > what and where from? You do not need to download anything