On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 09:38:07AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> After all, it implements a FreqUently Requested Feature (FURF).
I believe you mean "Frequently User-Requested Feature" (FURF).
-Amir
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Asger> So, we all agree that the patch is good, except maybe for the
Asger> command-line name. So, Lgb or Jean-Marc, I trust your
Asger> judgement. Please apply the patch and change the command-line
Asger> to whatever you prefer
> Also it uses -- long form arguments, which is good from a GNU point of
> view, but not really in line with other command line options.
Actually, we support "--help" and "-help", but that's a secret feature.
I agree that the options should be in synch with the LyX tradition, whatever
that is.
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Lgb, please do not hold it back just because it introduces one |
>> command line switch that you do not like.
>>
>> I just want people to speak up about this first.
Asger> Fair enough.
>> What about "-f buffer-export-htm
> | Lgb, please do not hold it back just because it introduces one
> | command line switch that you do not like.
>
> I just want people to speak up about this first.
Fair enough.
> What about "-f buffer-export-html" which is what I would prefere.
I think André introduced some shorthands as wel
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Did this patch ever go in? There is no doubt the patch is good.
I agree on that.
| Lgb, please do not hold it back just because it introduces one
| command line switch that you do not like.
I just want people to speak up about this firs
> Remember the 'lyx UserGuide.lyx --export latex' stuff?
> The new version of the patch can be found under
>
> http://mathematik.htwm.de/Software/LyX/buffer-patch-2 )
>
> It's sort of 'minimalistic' approach, it only contains the code that is
> necessary to get the feature working. Since
"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > OK. But I'd suggest making --export foo == --function "buffer-export foo",
| > as it's easier to remember and explain.
|
| This option is already there since you can type
|
| --execute "buffer-export foo"
|
| and --export is transformed interna
"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| To Amir: Of course often used commands should get simple aliases, and in
| fact --export foo translates directly to --execute "buffer-export foo"
| already.
I don't agree.
Lgb
> > I think we want to make this more general. A command switch --export
> > should perhaps be --function instead
> >
> > lyx --function "buffer-export html"
> >
> > or similar so that we can use the same code for all lyx-funcs.
>
> OK. But I'd suggest making --export foo == --function "buffer-
> OK. But I'd suggest making --export foo == --function "buffer-export foo",
> as it's easier to remember and explain.
This option is already there since you can type
--execute "buffer-export foo"
and --export is transformed internally to exactly this command.
The naming of the internal functi
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 07:28:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I think we want to make this more general. A command switch --export
> should perhaps be --function instead
>
> lyx --function "buffer-export html"
>
> or similar so that we c
"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| http://mathematik.htwm.de/Software/LyX/buffer-patch-2 )
|
| It's sort of 'minimalistic' approach, it only contains the code that is
| necessary to get the feature working. Since it does not remove anything
| I am fairly sure that I did not break a
13 matches
Mail list logo
