"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| http://mathematik.htwm.de/Software/LyX/buffer-patch-2 )
|
| It's sort of 'minimalistic' approach, it only contains the code that is
| necessary to get the feature working. Since it does not remove anything
| I am fairly sure that I did not break anything.
I think we want to make this more general. A command switch --export
should perhaps be --function instead
lyx --function "buffer-export html"
or similar so that we can use the same code for all lyx-funcs.
One small note:
We decided some time ago that we want to use this construct:
"<type> const <ref/pointer>" instead of "const <type> <ref/pointer>"
ad. exort
What is conceptually cleanest:
buffer.export(...)
or
export(buffer, ...).
But I guess we need huge changes to use the second one...
Lgb
