"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > OK. But I'd suggest making --export foo == --function "buffer-export foo",
| > as it's easier to remember and explain.
|
| This option is already there since you can type
|
| --execute "buffer-export foo"
|
| and --export is transformed internally to exactly this command.
| The naming of the internal functions is currently such a mess that I don't
| want to make this directly known to the user.
Then I don't want the --export at all.
What is wrong with the naming of "internal" functions? (they are not
supposed to be internal names)
Lgb
