Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-16 Thread Dov Feldstern
José Matos wrote: On Sunday 15 July 2007 10:47:46 Martin Vermeer wrote: If the LaTeX output is different, I would say it is a format change... the problem is then to produce a lyx2lyx entry that would modify an old .lyx file upon conversion to the new format so, that it nevertheless produces the

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-16 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 15 July 2007 10:47:46 Martin Vermeer wrote: > If the LaTeX output is different, I would say it is a format > change... the problem is then to produce a lyx2lyx entry > that would modify an old .lyx file upon conversion to the > new format so, that it nevertheless produces the old LaTeX >

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-15 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:18:35AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote: > Joost Verburg wrote: > > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >> Quite frankly, as there is no format change and that this needs some more > >> testing, I'd prefer that you wait for 1.5.1 which will hopefully happen > >> very soon. Just look

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-14 Thread Dov Feldstern
Joost Verburg wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Quite frankly, as there is no format change and that this needs some more testing, I'd prefer that you wait for 1.5.1 which will hopefully happen very soon. Just look at my recent brown paper bag which was supposed to be very very safe. According

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-14 Thread Dov Feldstern
Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:10:10PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote: Attached find the latest additions to the patch. Enrico, I think these will solve the samples you sent me, and it seems to still work for the RTL stuff. But I haven't had time to clean up the patch yet, nor

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-14 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:10:10PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote: > Attached find the latest additions to the patch. Enrico, I think these > will solve the samples you sent me, and it seems to still work for the > RTL stuff. But I haven't had time to clean up the patch yet, nor have I > tested i

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-14 Thread Joost Verburg
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Quite frankly, as there is no format change and that this needs some more testing, I'd prefer that you wait for 1.5.1 which will hopefully happen very soon. Just look at my recent brown paper bag which was supposed to be very very safe. According to the description of

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Dov Feldstern wrote: Hi! I have to stop working now, I'm going to be offline until tomorrow night. Attached find the latest additions to the patch. Enrico, I think these will solve the samples you sent me, and it seems to still work for the RTL stuff. But I haven't had time to clean up the pa

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-13 Thread Dov Feldstern
Dov Feldstern wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:48:49AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote: I realized that with the partial solution, which fixed some cases, other cases which used to work stopped working. So the only way to go is to provide a complete solution for all cases

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-13 Thread Dov Feldstern
Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:48:49AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote: I realized that with the partial solution, which fixed some cases, other cases which used to work stopped working. So the only way to go is to provide a complete solution for all cases (well, maybe not *all

Re: [new patch] bug 1820

2007-07-13 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:48:49AM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote: > I realized that with the partial solution, which fixed some cases, other > cases which used to work stopped working. So the only way to go is to > provide a complete solution for all cases (well, maybe not *all*...). > That's what