Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-18 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 10:19:25PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >A pity that you cannot come to denmark, we should get drunk (at least > >I) and then we could go outside and fight it out. > > You'd loose, I've been practising French boxing in my youth. > > >Are you sure you > >cannot come? >

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-18 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:19:55PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > >Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >>>Are you sure you cannot come [to denmmark]? > >> > >>I'd like to but it will be difficult. > > > >I think going to Denmark will by far be the best way to solve the issues

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-18 Thread Helge Hafting
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I am sure he his but that is not the problem. We should be able to work out the frictions without meeting face to face. The problem here is that humans interface better face to face. E-mail is ok for conveying ideas, but not emotions. Or an impression of how another

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> I am sure he his but that is not the problem. We should be Abdelrazak> able to work out the frictions without meeting face to Abdelrazak> face. It is not always possible. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-18 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Are you sure you cannot come [to denmmark]? I'd like to but it will be difficult. I think going to Denmark will by far be the best way to solve the issues. In the history of LyX, there has been a tradition of long and intense discussions

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-18 Thread Asger Ottar Alstrup
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Are you sure you cannot come [to denmmark]? I'd like to but it will be difficult. I think going to Denmark will by far be the best way to solve the issues. In the history of LyX, there has been a tradition of long and intense discussions about this and that. They co

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Edwin Leuven
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: You'd loose, I've been practising French boxing in my youth. like zidane?! lars, be careful!! ;-)

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > I have to change and you are right. Of course that's how it is. | | Are you ironic here or serious? I was pretty serious. A bit of both I guess. | > A pity that you cannot come to denmark, we should get drunk (at least | > I) and then we could g

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Hell"? It is not very bad lamguage if you ask me. You have been using | worse word against me. Check your archive. Then I am sorry, I'll try to clean up my language and henceforth only use the most civil language in my

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Hell"? It is not very bad lamguage if you ask me. You have been using | worse word against me. Check your archive. Then I am sorry, I'll try to clean up my language and henceforth only use the most civil language in my accusations. | > | > The on

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | This avoids the bv->owner()->dispatch() redirec

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | This avoids the bv->owner()->dispatch() redirection. | > | > | | Will commit

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | This avoids the bv->owner()->dispatch() redirection. | > | | Will commit soon. | > I am not confident in its correctness. | | I am not co

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | This avoids the bv->owner()->dispatch() redirection. | > | | Will commit soon. | > I am not confident in its correctness. | | I am not confident in your empty argumen

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This avoids the bv->owner()->dispatch() redirection. | | Will commit soon. I am not confident in its correctness. I am not confident in your empty argument. Abdel.

Re: [PATCH] make ensureBufferClean a private member of LyXFunc

2006-09-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This avoids the bv->owner()->dispatch() redirection. | | Will commit soon. I am not confident in its correctness. -- Lgb