Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| "Hell"? It is not very bad lamguage if you ask me. You have been using
| worse word against me. Check your archive.
Then I am sorry, I'll try to clean up my language and henceforth only
use the most civil language in my accusations.
| > | > The onus is on _you_ to show
| > | > that the changes you make are correct.
| > | | No, it's you who should understand the code first.
| > Ah.. the "it is you, not me tactic"
|
| It is not a tactic but the simple truth. I dislike the way you take
| everything for granted.
ditto.
| > | I am not going each
| > | time to explain you how a code that you have probably written is
| > | supposed to work. If you cannot do that I don't need an empty argument.
| > If you cannot explain in simple (even civil) terms why your patch is
| > correct, then something is wrong.
|
| Man, you just say "I am not confident in its correctness". That's not
| enough for me to understand what you think is wrong. I've never
| refused a single question in this list. So if you need to understand
| something just ask in a civil manner.
You know of course that this goes both ways. I know that my style is a
bit terse at times.
| I am fad up with these repetitive discussion.
| So either you change
| your behaviour or I stop all development in trunk. If you prefer that,
| I can develop in my personal branch and so you can cherry pick
| whatever you like in it.
|
| Please tell me your choice.
*sigh*
I have to change and you are right. Of course that's how it is.
A pity that you cannot come to denmark, we should get drunk (at least
I) and then we could go outside and fight it out. Are you sure you
cannot come?
--
Lgb
