> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>> So I would be very pleased if you could test my lang2.diff patch
>> and tell me what does not work.
Uwe> I did, see my last post to the original thread. You might think
Uwe> I'm not good enough to sent patc
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
So I would be very pleased if you could test my lang2.diff patch and
tell me what does not work.
I did, see my last post to the original thread. You might think I'm not
good enough to sent patches, but even if my solution was not the
shortest p
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
So I would be very pleased if you could test my lang2.diff patch and
tell me what does not work.
I did, see my last post to the original thread. You might think I'm not good enough to sent patches,
but even if my solution was not the shortest possible one, it wor
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Now I'm confused as Abdel stated two days ago I should better use
Uwe> the .clear() method and not string().
I think Abdel referred to something like
tmp = string();
this is a bit different.
Indeed. Given "strin
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> You have to clear lang_pack in this case. otherwise you will
Uwe> return "\\usepackage{babel}" although babel shouldn't be called.
I'd be interested if you could test the latest patch I posted. With
it, you will see that since we return an
> Uwe, it is a bit annoying to have you change code without discussion
> instead of looking at my points.
Sorry. I was sure I did what you wanted.
>>+ string lang_pack = lyxrc.language_package;
>>+if (lang_pack == "\\usepackage{babel}") {
>>+ // suppress the b
Uwe, it is a bit annoying to have you change code without discussion
instead of looking at my points. But OK, let's adapt to the moving
target.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
+ string lang_pack = lyxrc.language_package;
+if (lang_pack == "\\usepackage{babel}") {
+ // suppres
