>>>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: >> So I would be very pleased if you could test my lang2.diff patch >> and tell me what does not work. Uwe> I did, see my last post to the original thread. You might think Uwe> I'm not good enough to sent patches, but even if my solution was Uwe> not the shortest possible one, it worked and fixed a real bug. The problem with it is that the logic was a bit too complicated and it is typically the kind of function that would have been difficult to understand in one year. I am not doing this to annoy you. How do you think I got to understand how LyX guts work? Because other people took the time to tell me when I was wrong. It is not a matter of being better or worse, BTW. Uwe> My original commit was approved by José btw. Yes, I know, I did not complain that it got committed at the time. It is my fault if I did not look at it closely. >> I depends: what is the latex output you'd like to have? The best >> is to ask a CJK user what we want to obtain, and then see how to >> implement it. Uwe> Sorry, but please don't think that I'm stupid. The bug report Uwe> contains a testcase and it is obvious that \selectlanguage must Uwe> not be called when there is no argument for it. Definitely true :) I thought a bit more about it after sending the message, and it seems that avoiding this selectlanguage might be enough. JMarc
