Martin Vermeer wrote:
Using operator==() in that case is misleading as we suddenly have
situations with a == b, b == c, and a != c.
For fuzzy comparison, a named function should be used.
Agreed. I wasn't very happy with it, too.
I will fix it in the next commit.
But for adjacenc
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:14:56PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >Using operator==() in that case is misleading as we suddenly have
> >situations with a == b, b == c, and a != c.
> >
> >For fuzzy comparison, a named function should be used.
> >
> >
> Agreed. I wasn't very
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Using operator==() in that case is misleading as we suddenly have
situations with a == b, b == c, and a != c.
For fuzzy comparison, a named function should be used.
Agreed. I wasn't very happy with it, too.
I will fix it in the next commit.
Michael
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 07:00:29PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> changes that only differ in their change time with abs(ct1 - ct2) < 300 sec,
> they will be merged (and the later change time is preserved).
> Technically, the check for equality (or similarity) is made in
> operator==(...
