Martin Vermeer wrote:
Using operator==() in that case is misleading as we suddenly have situations with a == b, b == c, and a != c.For fuzzy comparison, a named function should be used.Agreed. I wasn't very happy with it, too. I will fix it in the next commit.But for adjacency this objection doesn't hold, does it?
??? I don't understand. merge() will make use of isSimilarTo() for now on.Michael
