On Tuesday 12 June 2001 16:58, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
> | Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønne
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> by some amount of time it seems... Then I guess the boost people
Lars> will not be overly eager to fix this.
Lars> Angus, what are your changes of getting a newer compiler?
And the latest is 6.3.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
| Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming
| Lars> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | >
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 12 June
Lars> 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming
Lars> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I have FINALLY managed to
Lars> compile lyx again by reve
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
I just tried the Apply stuff and now it works as expected (for me).
Could I have one more request? Would it be possible to have some sort
of "Reset" button which put's all the fields again into "No change"?
Would that be a good idea and/or fast to realize?
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
| version
| > | 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to
version
> | 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
> | frontend.
> |
> | So...
>
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 12:55, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why
you
> > didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past. I know that it didn't do
all
> > that it should but have lost the r
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Angus> I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
| Angus> lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
| Angus> bugs that I know to exist in the fronten
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting
Angus> lyxsum.C to version 1.18 and so can now address some of the
Angus> bugs that I know to exist in the frontend.
Note that it should work now with the real head code. At
On 12-Jun-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen, can you remember what the bug was in the Character dialog and why you
> didn't like the patch I sent to you weeks past. I know that it didn't do all
> that it should but have lost the relevant mails. Pointers to the thread in
> the list would be w
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have FINALLY managed to compile lyx again by reverting lyxsum.C to version
| 1.18 and so can now address some of the bugs that I know to exist in the
| frontend.
|
| So...
So... what specific problems did you have with the new lyxsum, on what
code
> Michael> IMHO 1.1.6 is unusable due to the major problems with tables.
> Michael> Therefore, if I were you, I wouldn't spend a single minute on
> Michael> further bug fix releases. 1.2.0 is all I am longing for...
>
> Not everybody is as dependant on table as you are... Moreover, the
> work on 1
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> IMHO 1.1.6 is unusable due to the major problems with tables.
Michael> Therefore, if I were you, I wouldn't spend a single minute on
Michael> further bug fix releases. 1.2.0 is all I am longing for...
Not everybody is as dep
On 12 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> As far as I can see this is the case now for 1.2.0cvs, where the
> character popup has been moved to GUI-I land. I do not know how easy
> this would be for 1.1.6.
IMHO 1.1.6 is unusable due to the major problems with tables. Therefore,
if I were you,
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, for the other font buttons, we force toggling (bold, etc)
>> because this makes sense. Are you saying that we should the
>> freefont stuff so that it works exactly like the popup? This seems
>> sensible.
Michael> Yes, defin
Hi,
> Michael> First of all, LyX does not behave the way the dialog suggests
> Michael> it. Secondly, my experience is that you don't always want LyX
> Michael> to toggle layout settings in practice. For that reason, it
> Michael> would like to draw your attention to the fact that
> Michael> "fon
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> First of all, LyX does not behave the way the dialog suggests
Michael> it. Secondly, my experience is that you don't always want LyX
Michael> to toggle layout settings in practice. For that reason, it
Michael> would like to d
> Now, we can argue whether this is a good thing or not. Either the
> popup or the code have to be fixed. Do people who use this feature
> often have an idea on it? Michael seems to think this does not make
> sense.
First of all, LyX does not behave the way the dialog suggests it. Secondly, my
e
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In
John>
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=233236&group_id=15212&atid=115212
John> Michael points out that the size is toggled with default despite
John> the claims of the dialog.
John> Who is wrong, the dialo
20 matches
Mail list logo
