On 09/03/2011 4:31 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if you can help. I'm a complete LaTeX novice, but need to produce
some exam scripts using a .sty produced by our hardcore LaTeX users (as usual
there are two camps - the LaTeX users and the MS Word users!). I don't have
tome to learn
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| While re-compiling LyX, I noticed the following warning:
|
| ..\..\..\src\lyxfunc.C(218) : warning C4244: 'initializing' :
| conversion from 'lyx::char_type' to 'char', possible loss of data
|
| in
|
| void LyXFunc::handleKeyFunc(kb_action actio
While re-compiling LyX, I noticed the following warning:
..\..\..\src\lyxfunc.C(218) : warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion
from 'lyx::char_type' to 'char', possible loss of data
in
void LyXFunc::handleKeyFunc(kb_action action)
{
char c = encoded_last_key;
The problem is tha
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc, would you accept a patch porting this to the 1.3.x
Angus> branch too? It enables us to clean up after finished conversion
Angus> processes.
Yes. Actually, I planned to ask after finishing reading the thread...
JMarc
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> What about (almost the same as the original one)
>
> while (ipit != ipend) {
> InProgressProcesses::iterator curr = ipit++;
> if (curr->second.snippets.empty())
> in_progress_.erase(curr);
> }
>
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> if (ipit == ipend)
> return;
> InProgressProcesses::iterator next = boost::next(ipit);
> while (ipit != ipend) {
> if (ipit->second.snippets.empty()) {
> in_progress_.erase(ipit);
>
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking for a small code snippet that tells me how to use
> iterators in combination with erase (the latter makes the iterator invalid).
>
> When browsing through the LyX sources, I came across the following code:
>
> void PreviewLoader::Impl::remove(s
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 01:17:12PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking for a small code snippet that tells me how to use
> iterators in combination with erase (the latter makes the iterator invalid).
>
> When browsing through the LyX sources, I came across the following code:
>
Hi,
I was looking for a small code snippet that tells me how to use
iterators in combination with erase (the latter makes the iterator invalid).
When browsing through the LyX sources, I came across the following code:
void PreviewLoader::Impl::remove(string const & latex_snippet)
{
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:46:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This is what I've done:
>
> int const nlines = int(lyx::count(preamble.begin(), preamble.end(), '\n'));
> for (int j = 0; j != nlines; ++j) {
> texrow.newline();
> }
or
TYPE const nlines = lyx
On Monday 14 January 2002 12:27 pm, you wrote:
> | Well, there is no reason to count down other than to obfuscate:
> | for (int j = countChar(preamble, '\n'); j-- ;) {
> | texrow.newline();
> | }
> >
> | I'll change it to:
> | for (int j = 0;
> | j != lyx::count(
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | They should be identical (except for the actual value of j in the body).
> | However I'd prefer "counting up" on non-critical paths
>
> Also counting up is a bit easier to read,
That's the reason for my preference.
> b
On Monday 14 January 2002 11:52 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:48AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Whilst replacing countChar with lyx::count, I came across this line
whose
> >> semantics I do not understand.
> >>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:48AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Whilst replacing countChar with lyx::count, I came across this line whose
> semantics I do not understand.
>
> src/buffer.C:2452:
> for (int j = countChar(preamble, '\n'); j-- ;) {
'If j != 0 decrement it and h
Whilst replacing countChar with lyx::count, I came across this line whose
semantics I do not understand.
src/buffer.C:2452:
for (int j = countChar(preamble, '\n'); j-- ;) {
shouldn't this be
for (int j = countChar(preamble, '\n'); j >= 0; --j) {
Alternatively, ca
15 matches
Mail list logo
