Am Mittwoch, dem 06.11.2024 um 08:00 +0100 schrieb Prof. Dr.-Ing.
Jürgen Klingenberg:
> thank you for the great program!
> Many LaTeX fans are under the threat of the sword of Damocles
> in the form of the requirement for accessible documents
> for people with disabilities (e.g. PDF/U
Am Donnerstag, dem 07.11.2024 um 16:41 +0900 schrieb Yokota K.:
> Since \DocumentMetadata{…} needs to come in front of \documentclass
> declaration, LyX layout scheme probably need be updated.
No, we have an UI for it as of LyX 2.4:
Document > Settings > PDF Settings > Do
Dear Prof. Klingenberg,
Looking at related LaTeX News
(https://www.latex-project.org/news/2022/03/21/latex-dev-2022-1/ under the
title of \DocumentMetadata), is it sufficient to add \DocumentMetadata{…} at
the head of LaTeX file to create PDF/UA?
LaTeX tagging-project
(https://github.com
Dear developer freaks,
thank you for the great program!
Many LaTeX fans are under the threat of the sword of Damocles
in the form of the requirement for accessible documents
for people with disabilities (e.g. PDF/UA (Universal Accessibility)).
Are there any plans to do something about this with
phase
> package.
And this (just \DocumentMetadata without loading of the testphase
package) is possible as of LyX 2.4.0 via
Document > Settings > PDF Properties > Document Metadata. Its content
is wrapped into \DocumentMetadata{...} and output before
\documentclass.
HTH,
--
Jürgen
--
l
still be useful to be able to have this available right now. It can
probably be implemented easily by somebody familiar with the LyX code base.
Here are the required lines:
\RequirePackage{pdfmanagement-testphase} % Enable PDF management for tagging
\DocumentMetadata{
testphase = phase-II
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 09:42:06PM +, Boylan, Ross wrote:
> I tracked the problem down, and lyx was not the cause. Some of the R
> packaging tools that were running lyx, were deleting the directory under some
> circumstances.
Thanks for confirming :)
Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-dev
problem is that when I run `lyx -export pdf2 -v
> inst\doc\msep_num.lyx` under some conditions-detailed below---the .lyx file
> and the doc directory it is in are deleted, and no pdf is created in the
> top-level directory
To which Pavel replied, among other things,
>At the moment I d
`lyx -export pdf2 -v
> inst\doc\msep_num.lyx` under some conditions-detailed below---the .lyx file
> and the doc directory it is in are deleted, and no pdf is created in the
> top-level director
lyx file and the doc directory it
is in are deleted, and no pdf is created in the top-level directory. Here's
the accompanying output:
[1] ""
[2] "Runni
There is the latexdiff tool, but I do not know if it works on WIidoze.
el
On 2024-01-22 23:13 , Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
> Different font, maybe ? Do you have the possibility to find what is the
> difference between 2.4 LaTeX output and 2.3 LaTeX output ?
[...]
--
lyx-devel mailing li
Didier,
which export are you using? I like pdf5 (lualatex which is powerful and
slow'ish) and then there is pdf4 (pdflatex).
el
On 2024-01-22 22:41 , didiergab...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Compared to version 2.3.7 and from the default settings the
> difference is obvious.
On 1/22/24 17:05, didiergab...@free.fr wrote:
@José Matos
I notice that the images included in the text thread do not go
through… Here it is as an attachment
I think I got the image the first time. It may be that they do not show
up in the archive.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-deve
@José Matos
I notice that the images included in the text thread do not go through… Here it
is as an attachment
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
obvious. The PDF (graphic) option is set to pdfview... But by
changing the parameters (custom, default system...) It's still just
as ugly... On the other hand, the pdflatex export is very good.
This is an installation under Windows 10.
Do you have an idea?
Can you provide a small file, maybe
. The PDF (graphic) option is set to pdfview... But by
| |
|
| | | changing the parameters (custom, default system...) It's still
| | | just
| |
|
| | | as ugly... On the other hand, the pdflatex export is very good.
| |
|
| | | This is an installation under Windows 10.
| |
|
| | | D
On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 22:24 +0100, didiergab...@free.fr wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I also noticed on this occasion that the export to a Lyx archive does
> not work…
> I have the following error message (see screenshot)
What do you get when you do "Help->About LyX", in French it should
Le 22/01/2024 à 21:41, didiergab...@free.fr a écrit :
Hi,
Compared to version 2.3.7 and from the default settings the difference
is obvious. The PDF (graphic) option is set to pdfview... But by
changing the parameters (custom, default system...) It's still just as
ugly... On the other
On 1/22/24 15:48, didiergab...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Compared to version 2.3.7 and from the default settings the difference
is obvious. The PDF (graphic) option is set to pdfview... But by
changing the parameters (custom, default system...) It's still just as
ugly... On the other hand
Hi,
Compared to version 2.3.7 and from the default settings the difference is
obvious.
The PDF (graphic) option is set to pdfview... But by changing the parameters
(custom, default system...) It's still just as ugly... On the other hand, the
pdflatex export is very good.
This
Hi,
Compared to version 2.3.7 and from the default settings the difference is
obvious.
The PDF (graphic) option is set to pdfview... But by changing the parameters
(custom, default system...) It's still just as ugly... On the other hand, the
pdflatex export is very good.
This
On Sat, 2023-12-02 at 11:25 -0500, T Rex wrote:
> sorry, I see that it was treated
Yes, we need to move this to the first place in our FAQ. :-D
Question: What should I do since I have the XYZ problem?
Answer: It is probably fixed in 2.4.0 version, please check there.
In this particular case the
sorry, I see that it was treated
El sáb, 2 dic 2023 a la(s) 09:46, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió:
> When I insert a pdf I get the error:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File ".../scripts/convertDefault.py", line 64, in
> if sys.argv[1] == '
When I insert a pdf I get the error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ".../scripts/convertDefault.py", line 64, in
if sys.argv[1] == 'pdf' and (version >= 0x060206 or gm):
^^^
TypeError: '>='
Am Dienstag, dem 18.07.2023 um 14:47 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> citecolor=[rgb]{0.3,0,0.3},linkcolor=[rgb]{0.3,0,0.3},urlcolor=[rgb]{
> 0.3,0,0.3}
This one's handled properly now, as well.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-de
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 18.07.2023 um 14:47 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > the newly born pdfSupportModule->optionsTE in pdf settings got
> > LaTeXHighlighter
> > enabled, but it gets the higlighting wrong.
&
Am Dienstag, dem 18.07.2023 um 14:47 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> the newly born pdfSupportModule->optionsTE in pdf settings got
> LaTeXHighlighter
> enabled, but it gets the higlighting wrong.
>
> Not sure whether this is bug in highlighter or it's simply fact that
Hi Juergen,
the newly born pdfSupportModule->optionsTE in pdf settings got LaTeXHighlighter
enabled, but it gets the higlighting wrong.
Not sure whether this is bug in highlighter or it's simply fact that you
don't put in full fledged latex constructions.
Try e.g.:
citecolor=[r
From 0a5a575c00701c6bebe5e6ff686037e6c386bdf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John R Hudson
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:46:42 +
Subject: [PATCH] Insert entries for Braille, FiXme, PDF Comments, PDF Forms,
Ruby and TODO notes into Chapter 4 Modules of Additional.lyx
---
lib/doc/Additional.lyx
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022 12.48.10 WEST Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > ping :)
>
> ping :)
>
> > p
Riki is not the only person busy. :-D
After the next week things will calm down a bit and I will look into that.
--
José Abílio--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 06:13:10PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:36:57AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 21.45.40 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Jose, could I ask for pythonic help?
> > > We would need a routine in configure.py which check wh
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:36:57AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 21.45.40 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Jose, could I ask for pythonic help?
> > We would need a routine in configure.py which check whether to remove
> > eps->png
> > conversion in case IM bans those co
On Wednesday, 2 February 2022 21.45.40 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jose, could I ask for pythonic help?
> We would need a routine in configure.py which check whether to remove eps->png
> conversion in case IM bans those conversions. That could be done this way by
> checking return status of the conver
alpha/beta etc)
>
> One option to automatically overcome the issue is to disable eps->png
> conversion and allow pdf->png so that lyx performs eps->pdf->png.
> On my debian adding this to preferences sort of fixes the issue:
>
> \converter "pdf6" "p
conversion and allow pdf->png so that lyx performs eps->pdf->png.
On my debian adding this to preferences sort of fixes the issue:
\converter "pdf6" "png" "pdftoppm -png -singlefile $$i > $$o" ""
\converter "eps" "png" "&
Pavel and Paul,
Thanks very much for your suggestions.
As it turned out, pdfstartview did the trick. In particular, adding the
following line to the LaTeX Preamble:
\hypersetup{pdfstartview={XYZ null null 1.00}}
gives my compiled pdf files at the percent magnification I set in Adobe
Acrobat
I recently reported a regression that can be seen in the attached .lyx file.
There is no error from LaTeX when compiling from master, it is just that the
output is not as expected.
When I view the resulting PDF from master, I get "Negative width" messages in
the terminal with both
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 06:57:08PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> The zoom level at which a file should be opened is apparently a property of
> the file (in some cases) and, when present, will override the default zoom
> setting in Reader (and presumably in Acrobat Pro).
Correct, pdf
But I do a lot of editing of LYX files and compiling to pdf
(many! times a day), and I want the pdf
file to be at 125% when I open it, and not have to scroll to get
that.
I did find that there is a LaTeX \mag , e.g., \mag 1200 for
20% increase, but I haven't be
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:24 PM Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> On 30/09/2021 9:03 am, Doug Martin wrote:
>
> Rasmus,
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
> Of course one can do what you suggest, and I have done it.
>
> But I do a lot of editing of LYX files and compiling to
On 30/09/2021 9:03 am, Doug Martin wrote:
Rasmus,
Thanks for your quick response.
Of course one can do what you suggest, and I have done it.
But I do a lot of editing of LYX files and compiling to pdf (many!
times a day), and I want the pdf
file to be at 125% when I open it, and not have to
Rasmus,
Thanks for your quick response.
Of course one can do what you suggest, and I have done it.
But I do a lot of editing of LYX files and compiling to pdf (many! times a
day), and I want the pdf
file to be at 125% when I open it, and not have to scroll to get that.
I did find that there is
Dear Doug,
I am sorry if what you are describing is a more complex issue then I what I
hear it to be, but did you try changing the zoom level in the pdf viewer
itself?
Try e.g. pressing the Ctrl and the + keys simultaneously, or holding Ctrl
while scrolling up on your mouse wheel, or clicking
My pdf files compiled from LYX always have 56.7% magnification, no matter
whether I use
different document classes such as Article versus svmono, and I want them
larger by default,
e.g., 125%. I have not found a solution in the User Guide, and wonder if
anyone can explain
how to do this?
Doug
Jean-Pierre,
I "View" the file from the Help -> Specific Manual -> PDF-form.lyx
with Skim (on the Macs) and can confirm the forms display correctly,
in particular the From and Until fields.
el
On 02/07/2021 18:26, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Le 02/07/2021 à 12:40, Dr Eberha
Le 02/07/2021 à 12:40, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit :
Jean-Pierre
I just use the 'PDF Form' Module (which requires/loads hyperref) and the
Insert->Custom Insets
offers a number of choices such as
TextField.
Then you can put stuff like
width=9cm, charsize=9pt, bord
Jean-Pierre
I just use the 'PDF Form' Module (which requires/loads hyperref) and the
Insert->Custom Insets
offers a number of choices such as
TextField.
Then you can put stuff like
width=9cm, charsize=9pt, bordercolor={0.94 0.97 1.0},
backgrou
Dear Developers
A French user draw my attention on the fact that the dynamic forms documented in
section 5 of the PDF_Form.lyx manual (in examples/Modules) did not work as
described.
After installing insdljs.sty, I could display the examples in the output. It
took me a while to understand th
On 2/12/21 5:16 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021 um 01:14 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
Hi, all,
I've been using current master for work lately, and I'm getting
frequent
errors when viewing a fairly simple master-child document. The
structure is:
TITLE ETC
INCLUD
Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021 um 01:14 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> Hi, all,
>
> I've been using current master for work lately, and I'm getting
> frequent
> errors when viewing a fairly simple master-child document. The
> structure is:
>
> TITLE ETC
> INCLUDE CHILD, which has most of the
Hi, all,
I've been using current master for work lately, and I'm getting frequent
errors when viewing a fairly simple master-child document. The structure is:
TITLE ETC
INCLUDE CHILD, which has most of the content
BIBLIOGRAPHY
On viewing (usually, this is master-buffer-view, from the child), I
o
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:38:25AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> In inserted graphics, we can select a page from a multi-page pdf using
> "latex and lyx options". This will show the correct graphics in the
> pdf output. But the preview always shows page 1. Would be nice to
&g
In inserted graphics, we can select a page from a multi-page pdf using
"latex and lyx options". This will show the correct graphics in the
pdf output. But the preview always shows page 1. Would be nice to
implement something to fix the preview.
--
Those who don't understan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:43:00AM +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Thanks all for suggestions.
> The file did compile in 2015.
> I tried to remove parts of the original.
> It turned out that a nomenclature lead to the error
As we figured out in background, the problem is using ligature 'fl'
as
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56 AM Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 06:50:45AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > > Thinking more, more straightforward solution to your problem would be
> just
> > > new check box ("Include file as pdf attachment as well&quo
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 06:50:45AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Thinking more, more straightforward solution to your problem would be just
> > new check box ("Include file as pdf attachment as well") in the listings
> > dialog,
> >
>
> How would this wor
> Thinking more, more straightforward solution to your problem would be just
> new check box ("Include file as pdf attachment as well") in the listings
> dialog,
>
How would this work for attaching images, sound files, etc.?
Thanks,
Joel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel
check box ("Include file as pdf attachment as well") in the listings dialog,
which would create necessary latex code for inclusion (and possible (re)define
varible e.g. "attached_file" with the filename string to be used later).
You would not need to play with external material m
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:46 PM Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> I use the listings package to include config files and program listings
> and the like, but you can't copy and paste these from the PDF, or rather
> they are mangled to be quite useless.
>
> Any way of achie
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:01 PM Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 07:45:20AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Sorry if I'm being dense, but what do you mean by "external template"?
> An
>
> Template used by Insert->File->External Material.
> You can find example templates in lib/xtemplat
This is a very important suggestion.
I am keeping an Ops handbook for my setup which runs to 600 pages.
I use the listings package to include config files and program listings
and the like, but you can't copy and paste these from the PDF, or rather
they are mangled to be quite useless.
An
Yes, pdfpages works very well within LyX.
greetings, el
On 2020-02-26 14:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
>> *If this is not currently possible, I want to solicit your thoughts on how
>> to incorporate such functionality.* My immediate thoug
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 07:45:20AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> Sorry if I'm being dense, but what do you mean by "external template"? An
Template used by Insert->File->External Material.
You can find example templates in lib/xtemplates and I suggest you spend
some time understanding this machine
f what I'm thinking, though I would want to be
> able to have such inclusion as opt-in. I'd propose bundling with the
> `embedfile` package. I will send an example of a PDF with electronic
> attachments later tonight to give a MWE (versus the MajorWE I linked
> previously).
The
graphics, etc.), it would be possible to wrap it into a magic macro that
> creates an attachment and bundles the file. Am I right?
>
That's along the lines of what I'm thinking, though I would want to be able
to have such inclusion as opt-in. I'd propose bundling with the
`embedfil
Le 26/02/2020 à 18:34, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Sure, I don't understand what's wrong with a plain hyperlink.
What I understand is that, whenever LyX outputs a file name (listings,
graphics, etc.), it would be possible to wrap it into a magic macro that
creates an attachment and bundles
o you mean by "external template"?
Insert->File->External Material...->Template: PDF Pages
This is for inserting PDF files into PDF files, right? I want to insert a
text/image/etc. file into a PDF file as an electronic attachment.
In this way, a person reading th
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:53 AM Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:45:20 -0700
> schrieb Joel Kulesza :
>
> ...
> > Sorry if I'm being dense, but what do you mean by "external template"?
> Insert->File->External Material...->Tem
Am Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:45:20 -0700
schrieb Joel Kulesza :
...
> Sorry if I'm being dense, but what do you mean by "external template"?
Insert->File->External Material...->Template: PDF Pages
Kornel
pgpwnt85J_0X0.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatu
I'm being dense, but what do you mean by "external template"? An
example application:
I am writing a report with LyX and want to show a Python source-code file
(myfile.py) in it with the listings package via a Program Listing. I also
want to attach the file electronically to the PDF so a us
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 06:15:20AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > I think the most obvious candidate is external material machinery.
>
> This means that I???ll have to specify the file name twice, right? It is
> often the case that I want/need to list the file but also want to include it
> for
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 05:51, Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> wrote:
>
> Le 26/02/2020 à 07:47, Joel Kulesza a écrit :
>> LyX Developers,
>> Recently, I've been making increased, and good, use of PDF attachments
>> (e.g., Appendix A of this technical report:
>
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 05:23, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
>> *If this is not currently possible, I want to solicit your thoughts on how
>> to incorporate such functionality.* My immediate thought is by using the
>
> I think the most obvi
Le 26/02/2020 à 07:47, Joel Kulesza a écrit :
LyX Developers,
Recently, I've been making increased, and good, use of PDF attachments (e.g.,
Appendix A of this technical report: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1574726).
I've achieved this with the `navigator` and `embedfile` packages
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> *If this is not currently possible, I want to solicit your thoughts on how
> to incorporate such functionality.* My immediate thought is by using the
I think the most obvious candidate is external material machinery.
> I'm curious t
LyX Developers,
Recently, I've been making increased, and good, use of PDF attachments
(e.g., Appendix A of this technical report:
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1574726).
I've achieved this with the `navigator` and `embedfile` packages using ERT.
`embedfile` is my preferred approach
in wrote:
>>>>> On 11/10/18 9:45 PM, Baris Erkus wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PDF graphics appears to be blurred in LyX when scaled from Graphics
>>>>>> Options --> LaTeX and LyX options --> Show in L
"No PDF viewer installed" error message when
"pdfview" is selected as Viewer. I am a bit lost whether this
should be
fixed by now or not in 2.3.1. I saw that the "pdfview" option is
missing
in current master. Maybe that will be the "fix"?
Daniel
As f
On 11/1/18 4:39 PM, Daniel wrote:
> On 2018-11-01 20:50, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>> On 2/11/2018 1:33 a.m., Daniel wrote:
>>> On 01/11/2018 13:13, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 12:56:08 CET schrieb Daniel
>>>> :
>>>>&g
On 2018-11-01 20:50, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 2/11/2018 1:33 a.m., Daniel wrote:
On 01/11/2018 13:13, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 12:56:08 CET schrieb Daniel
:
I am still getting the "No PDF viewer installed" error message when
"pdfview" is select
On 11/1/18 3:50 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> On 2/11/2018 1:33 a.m., Daniel wrote:
>> On 01/11/2018 13:13, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 12:56:08 CET schrieb Daniel
>>> :
>>>> I am still getting the "No PDF viewer installed"
On 2/11/2018 1:33 a.m., Daniel wrote:
On 01/11/2018 13:13, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 12:56:08 CET schrieb Daniel
:
I am still getting the "No PDF viewer installed" error message when
"pdfview" is selected as Viewer. I am a bit lost whether this sh
On 11/1/18 7:56 AM, Daniel wrote:
I am still getting the "No PDF viewer installed" error message when
"pdfview" is selected as Viewer. I am a bit lost whether this should
be fixed by now or not in 2.3.1. I saw that the "pdfview" option is
missing in current maste
On 01/11/2018 13:13, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 12:56:08 CET schrieb Daniel :
I am still getting the "No PDF viewer installed" error message when
"pdfview" is selected as Viewer. I am a bit lost whether this should be
fixed by now or not in 2
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 12:56:08 CET schrieb Daniel :
> I am still getting the "No PDF viewer installed" error message when
> "pdfview" is selected as Viewer. I am a bit lost whether this should be
> fixed by now or not in 2.3.1. I saw that the "pdfvie
I am still getting the "No PDF viewer installed" error message when
"pdfview" is selected as Viewer. I am a bit lost whether this should be
fixed by now or not in 2.3.1. I saw that the "pdfview" option is missing
in current master. Maybe that will be the "fix"?
Daniel
On 02/10/2018 17:40, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2018-10-02, Daniel wrote:
On 02/10/2018 08:58, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2018-09-21, Daniel wrote:
On 02/10/2018 08:58, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2018-09-21, Daniel wrote:
When I typeset a PDF with the default font settings (under Windows 10),
the
On 2018-10-02, Daniel wrote:
> On 02/10/2018 08:58, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2018-09-21, Daniel wrote:
> On 02/10/2018 08:58, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > On 2018-09-21, Daniel wrote:
> >
> > > When I typeset a PDF with the default font settings (under Wind
Moving over to devel...
On 02/10/2018 08:58, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2018-09-21, Daniel wrote:
When I typeset a PDF with the default font settings (under Windows 10),
the output text is rasterized (source and output files attached).
I haven't used the default font settings for a whil
On 22/09/2018 19:25, Daniel wrote:
On 21/09/2018 22:54, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
When I typeset a PDF with the default font settings (under Windows
10), the output text is rasterized (source and output files attached).
I haven't used the default font settings for a while, so maybe this is
n
On 21/09/2018 22:54, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
When I typeset a PDF with the default font settings (under Windows 10),
the output text is rasterized (source and output files attached).
I haven't used the default font settings for a while, so maybe this is
normal? But it seems strange to me.
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2018, 23:27 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > These are pacthes for the vulns reported on Aug 21, but as the
> > original report says:
>
> Yes, but it indicates that Artifex care and reacts swiftly. So no need
> to declare ghostscript death (yet).
I
Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2018, 23:27 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> These are pacthes for the vulns reported on Aug 21, but as the
> original report says:
Yes, but it indicates that Artifex care and reacts swiftly. So no need
to declare ghostscript death (yet).
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: Thi
On 09/02/2018 05:27 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>>> in policy.xml so they can continue their work.
>>> In longer-term -- if this ban continues -- we might try to ask Qt to do
>>> the
>>> conversions instead of imagemagick, but that's is definitely not for
>>> 2.3.1.
>>> Other ideas?
>>
Daniel wrote:
>> in policy.xml so they can continue their work.
>> In longer-term -- if this ban continues -- we might try to ask Qt to do
>> the
>> conversions instead of imagemagick, but that's is definitely not for
>> 2.3.1.
>> Other ideas?
>> Pavel
>> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/sec
Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2018, 12:59 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> After the recent discovery of ghoscript vulnerabilities distributions
> seem to
> actually follow suggestion of the security researcher who announced
> them
> and broadly ban any conversions from ps/eps/pdf/xps in
.
Or even as a separate entry.
After the recent discovery of ghoscript vulnerabilities distributions seem to
actually follow suggestion of the security researcher who announced them
and broadly ban any conversions from ps/eps/pdf/xps in imagemagick no matter
the consequences. I don't need to s
On 09/02/2018 10:50 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> In longer-term -- if this ban continues -- we might try to ask Qt to do the
>> conversions instead of imagemagick, but that's is definitely not for 2.3.1.
> That might be a good backup
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Unfortuntaly there is very little we can directly for 2.3.1.
> We should at least signalize in announcement for distro maintainers that this
> *is*
> issue and perhaps add some hint how to allow users to locally enable things
> in po
er the recent discovery of ghoscript vulnerabilities distributions seem to
actually follow suggestion of the security researcher who announced them
and broadly ban any conversions from ps/eps/pdf/xps in imagemagick no matter
the consequences. I don't need to stress on this list what it me
1 - 100 of 1192 matches
Mail list logo
