José Matos schrieb:
On Sunday 29 April 2007 16:48:35 Michael Gerz wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch changes some uses of the term "glossary" to
"nomenclature".
I will commit as soon as I get two OKs. (José vote will count as two).
AFAIU this is consensual, so please go ahead.
As so
On Sunday 29 April 2007 16:48:35 Michael Gerz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch changes some uses of the term "glossary" to
> "nomenclature".
>
> I will commit as soon as I get two OKs. (José vote will count as two).
AFAIU this is consensual, so please go ahead.
> Michael
--
José Abílio
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> the attached patch changes some uses of the term "glossary" to
"nomenclature".
>
> I will commit as soon as I get two OKs. (José vote will count as two).
Why that? The official name for this is "Glossary" and is used in all my
books I have?
I therefore vote for no, so n
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
Michael Gerz schrieb:
Please note that LaTeX will produce a "glossary" with the title
"Nomenclature" (try it out if you don't believe).
Oops, indeed.
Ok I give an OK.
Fine. Now I need a second OK to proceed. Guys?
Michael
Michael Gerz schrieb:
Please note that LaTeX will produce a "glossary" with the title
"Nomenclature" (try it out if you don't believe).
Oops, indeed.
Ok I give an OK.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
> the attached patch changes some uses of the term "glossary" to
"nomenclature".
>
> I will commit as soon as I get two OKs. (José vote will count as two).
Why that? The official name for this is "Glossary" and is used in all
my books I have?
I therefore vote for no, so no
> the attached patch changes some uses of the term "glossary" to "nomenclature".
>
> I will commit as soon as I get two OKs. (José vote will count as two).
Why that? The official name for this is "Glossary" and is used in all my books
I have?
I therefore vote for no, so now you need three OKs ;
Hi,
the attached patch changes some uses of the term "glossary" to
"nomenclature".
I will commit as soon as I get two OKs. (José vote will count as two).
Michael
José Matos schrieb:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 8:53:54 am Georg Baum wrote:
What I mean is that the insets that creates a no
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 8:53:54 am Georg Baum wrote:
>
> What I mean is that the insets that creates a nomenclature for LaTeX should
> not create a glossary for docbook. This is confusing, therefore the
> nomenclature inset should output something else than glossary entries for
> docbook IMHO.
In practice there is no single difference. All packages accept math symbols
and sort them in an identical way. That is why we can replace them easily.
Ugras
On 4/25/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> umm..
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> umm.. Really, what is the difference?? :-)
One is for words and the other for mathematical notation. Or at least
I thought so.
JMarc
umm.. Really, what is the difference?? :-)
On 4/25/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> This is in my TODO list. I have already finished the multiple
Ozgur> indices and thinking on extending it for multiple g
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> This is in my TODO list. I have already finished the multiple
Ozgur> indices and thinking on extending it for multiple glossaries.
Ozgur> But how will users react for this? Two glossary packages will
Ozgur> create confusion.
N
On 4/25/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> Terminology fits good, but Jean-Marc has a point. The title of
Ozgur> the glossary is Nomenclature by default and it will be wise to
Ozgur> keep the same word for me
José Matos wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2007 5:52:23 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> Georg> The only problem with this is the docbook output. AFAIK docbook
>> Georg> does not support a nomenclature or list of symbols. Maybe one
>> Georg> could use variablelist, but it does not fit exactly. IMH
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> Terminology fits good, but Jean-Marc has a point. The title of
Ozgur> the glossary is Nomenclature by default and it will be wise to
Ozgur> keep the same word for menu references for the sake of
Ozgur> consistency.
Yes, I think
problem is there is no "Real" glossary package. The most common one was (and
still is) nomencl.
I can add/ switch to support for a better glossary package. But the question
is which one.. If there would be any concensus on which glossary package to
switch for, I will happily implement it.
glossa
Terminology fits good, but Jean-Marc has a point. The title of the glossary
is Nomenclature by default and it will be wise to keep the same word for
menu references for the sake of consistency.
Anybody else wishes switching for another glossary package? It will be easy
for me to implement it (if
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Michael Gerz wrote:
Ozgur Ugras BARAN schrieb:
Notation Entry/ Notation List in user visible places, IMHO. People
complained about Nomenclature word before. (Some people also complained
for
Notation word :-) ).
Actually, it was me who complained about "Notation" :-) Thi
Ozgur Ugras BARAN schrieb:
Notation Entry/ Notation List in user visible places, IMHO. People
complained about Nomenclature word before. (Some people also
complained for
Notation word :-) ).
Actually, it was me who complained about "Notation" :-) This term - at
least in German - is rather mean
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> Notation Entry/ Notation List in user visible places, IMHO.
Ozgur> People complained about Nomenclature word before. (Some people
Ozgur> also complained for Notation word :-) ).
But Nomenclature is the word that appears in the
Notation Entry/ Notation List in user visible places, IMHO. People
complained about Nomenclature word before. (Some people also complained for
Notation word :-) ).
And maybe a warning for glotex in the lyx documentation.
On 4/24/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ozgur"
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> I like the doc version which omits the oldnomencl stuff. But I
Ozgur> observed one single problem: You are invoking makeindex for
Ozgur> nomencl after checking the the files with extensions .nlo OR
Ozgur> .glo exists.. However,
.diff follows the idea suggested by
Jean-Marc:
Test for the nomencl version in chkconfig.ltx and put either "nomencl"
or "nomencl" and "oldnomencl" to the packages.list file. Then the
availability of "oldnomencl" is tested to determine the version, defin
On Monday 23 April 2007 5:52:23 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Georg> The only problem with this is the docbook output. AFAIK docbook
> Georg> does not support a nomenclature or list of symbols. Maybe one
> Georg> could use variablelist, but it does not fit exactly. IMHO
> Georg> glossary shoul
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I prefer the doc version, because the tests in tex seem to be error
>> prone to me.
>>
>> What about the following updated version? Only the LaTeXFeatures
>> part has been changed.
Georg> Fine with me.
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> What I forgot: Of course you can misuse the nomencl stuff for
Georg> glossaries and redefine \nomname in the preamble, but I don't
Georg> think that LyX should do that.
Indeed.
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Then the is the problem of glossary versus nomenclature. At least my
>> version of nomencl.sty writes a helpful "Nomenclature" heading in
>> front of my glossary. This is stupid.
>
> Did you see Ugras' explanation for the choice of nomencl? IMHO
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I prefer the doc version, because the tests in tex seem to be
> error prone to me.
>
> What about the following updated version? Only the LaTeXFeatures part
> has been changed.
Fine with me. Do you put that in, or shall I do?
> Then the is the problem of glossary v
>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Here are my solutions: config.diff follows the idea suggested
Georg> by Jean-Marc: Test for the nomencl version in chkconfig.ltx and
Georg> put either "nomencl" or "nomencl"
tions of
makeindex.
The advantage of this solution is that there are no checks in the document.
The disadvantage is that you need to reconfigure if the nomencl version
changes.
The other version in doc.diff was almost finished before Jean-Marc made his
suggestion, so I finished it and presen
If you have a solution, go ahead, since I haven't got one but got an idea
only :). I just try to act responsible :)
I can still give you a hand, if you wish..
On 4/20/07, Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I can find a computer this weekend and if
Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I can find a computer this weekend and if nobody is already caring
> about nomencl.sty version mess, I'll try to find a solution.
As I wrote some days ago I have a solution that is almost finished and that
I will send when Jean-Marc is back. Of course if
On Thursday 19 April 2007 3:46:37 pm Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I can find a computer this weekend and if nobody is already caring about
> nomencl.sty version mess, I'll try to find a solution.
Please do. :-)
> Maybe you may wish to postpone Beta-2 until I submit the patch. Indee
Hi all,
If I can find a computer this weekend and if nobody is already caring about
nomencl.sty version mess, I'll try to find a solution.
Maybe you may wish to postpone Beta-2 until I submit the patch. Indeed,
releasing beta with this bug will end up with thousands of complaints. For
me, it is
35 matches
Mail list logo
