Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I prefer the doc version, because the tests in tex seem to be > error prone to me. > > What about the following updated version? Only the LaTeXFeatures part > has been changed.
Fine with me. Do you put that in, or shall I do? > Then the is the problem of glossary versus nomenclature. At least my > version of nomencl.sty writes a helpful "Nomenclature" heading in > front of my glossary. This is stupid. Did you see Ugras' explanation for the choice of nomencl? IMHO the easiest solution for this problem would be to not call this stuff "glossary" in LyX. Then in a later version a real glossary support could be added. The only problem with this is the docbook output. AFAIK docbook does not support a nomenclature or list of symbols. Maybe one could use variablelist, but it does not fit exactly. IMHO glossary should not be used, because it should be reserved for the future glossary inset. Georg
