Toplevel math menu (was: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug)

2005-01-27 Thread G. Milde
On 27.01.05, John Weiss wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:57:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > (This also reminded me how VERY VERY VERY unhappy I am about Math not > > having its own top-level menu entry anymore. It is such a separate and > > special part of both LyX and LaTeX, that thi

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-27 Thread John Weiss
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:57:26PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > (This also reminded me how VERY VERY VERY unhappy I am about Math not > having its own top-level menu entry anymore. It is such a separate and > special part of both LyX and LaTeX, that this old practice was more than > justified.

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Martin Vermeer
So I tried this idea, if ~S-^would be recognized, but no. What did help though was adding this to the X config: Option "XkbVariant""nodeadkeys" Now ^ for superscript works again... rejoice children of Israel... Still, no accents by deadkeys, and not by compose either (I enabled the

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 14:22, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Noteworthy is that > > - my LyX thinks that I pressed the key combination [S-^], which it does > not recognise as anything that should trigger math-superscript, or > anything else for that matter; whereas > - your LyX thinks you pressed [S-as

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 24 January 2005 09:51, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Yes, agree. But it is packaged in qt with FC3. The packages from kde-redat.se.net don't have that problem. :-) Since I saw you use rpmforge you can also use kde-redhat packages. :-) > - Martin -- Josà AbÃlio

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 13:26, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 24 January 2005 10:56, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... > > Any other difference you can think of? What does lyx -dbg key say > > for ^ ? > > Attached is the output of > $ qlyx13x -dbg key > dbg.log 2>&1 > > in which I: > HTH, > Angus I t

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 24 January 2005 10:56, Martin Vermeer wrote: > (To make sure: you type ^ and a blue superscript box opens? Yes. > What keyboard do you have and is ^ supposed to be a deadkey on it?) A generic 105 key keyboard. Attached is my /etc/X11/xorg.conf file. > Weird. Has anything changed here

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 12:14, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 24 January 2005 10:01, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE apps like this knode > > > console, but not when I'm using LyX. And again, I emphasise that > > > I'm using the compose-key approach to write accent

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 24 January 2005 10:01, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE apps like this knode > > console, but not when I'm using LyX. And again, I emphasise that > > I'm using the compose-key approach to write accents. I have no > > real idea what dead keys are but have thi

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 10:30, Angus Leeming wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > No, rather not. Have them too already :-( > > My version is qt-3.3.3-8. > > Mine too. > > > So, you seem to have the same stuff as I, but your accents work and mine > > don't. > > Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 10:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use > Martin> dead keys like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't > Martin> produce a superscript. Anno

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use Martin> dead keys like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't Martin> produce a superscript. Annoying. Martin> It's a qt-3.3.3- bug known as 141475 by Red Hat's Ma

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-24 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: > No, rather not. Have them too already :-( > My version is qt-3.3.3-8. Mine too. > So, you seem to have the same stuff as I, but your accents work and mine > don't. Mine do *partially*. They work in KDE apps like this knode console, but not when I'm using LyX. And again, I

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 00:45, Angus Leeming wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Martin Vermeer wrote: > >>> > and does it have immodule? > >>> > >>> I have no idea. How do I find out? > >>> Angus > >> > >> For imstance by rpm -ql qt and look for a directory > >> plugins/inputmethods. > > > > /us

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Angus Leeming
Angus Leeming wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: >>> > and does it have immodule? >>> >>> I have no idea. How do I find out? >>> Angus >> >> For imstance by rpm -ql qt and look for a directory >> plugins/inputmethods. > > /usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins > /usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods > /usr/lib/qt-

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: >> > and does it have immodule? >> >> I have no idea. How do I find out? >> Angus > > For imstance by rpm -ql qt and look for a directory > plugins/inputmethods. /usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins /usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods /usr/lib/qt-3.3/plugins/inputmethods/libqimsw-multi

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:51:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Sunday 23 January 2005 21:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Which qt version do you have > > qglobal.h tells me: > #define QT_VERSION_STR "3.3.3" > /* >QT_VERSION is (major << 16) + (minor << 8) + patch. > */ > #define QT_VERS

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Angus Leeming
On Sunday 23 January 2005 21:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Which qt version do you have qglobal.h tells me: #define QT_VERSION_STR "3.3.3" /* QT_VERSION is (major << 16) + (minor << 8) + patch. */ #define QT_VERSION 0x030303 > and does it have immodule? I have no idea. How do I find out? An

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:34:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > > Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use dead keys > > like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't produce a superscript. > > Sure it does. I have FC3 here and I've just fired

Re: Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Angus Leeming
Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use dead keys > like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't produce a superscript. Sure it does. I have FC3 here and I've just fired up LyX 1.3.x and created a formula a+b^2. Perfect. Trying LyX 1.4.x... yup,

Nasty qt-3.3.3 bug

2005-01-23 Thread Martin Vermeer
Just wanted to report that under FC3, LyX isn't able to use dead keys like ' ` ^ and the like. Also in math, ^ doesn't produce a superscript. Annoying. It's a qt-3.3.3- bug known as 141475 by Red Hat's bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=141475 This is going to becom