Am 26.10.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Well yes, there is no "env" command on Windows.
Thanks to Kornel this is now fixed.
Besides that, running is a nightmare:
- Somehow tex2lyx often deadlocks when outputting errors,
Indeed. When I re-run, it works.
- I need to have pyt
Am Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2015 um 20:28:00, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Op 29-10-2015 om 18:33 schreef Kornel Benko:
> > The problem was, that cmake accumulated messages from runtests.py.
> > Now runtests.py is called for each file separately.
> > Vincent, have you checked if that is OK to
Kornel Benko wrote:
> I see. In my installation there is no uniconvertor either.
I have it installed, but it is not called by LyX directly (at least
seraching for it in the complete 2.2 git folder results in 0 hits).
> It is 'convert' calling this, so maybe it is not 'convert' from
> image-magi
Op 29-10-2015 om 18:33 schreef Kornel Benko:
The problem was, that cmake accumulated messages from runtests.py.
Now runtests.py is called for each file separately.
Vincent, have you checked if that is OK to you?
Kornel
It indeed works much better.
I just don't understand what the fol
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> While running updatetex2lyxtest:
>
> algo2e.tex":
>Ignoring options 'boxed' of package algorithm2e.
This should be fixed one day hopefully.
> test-insets.tex:
>warning : Could not find included file 'Dummy Document.tex'. (2x)
>warning : Could not fin
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:35:43, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:29:30, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:02:08, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> > > Am 28.10.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> > >
> > > > > > It is onl
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 22:59:15, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 28.10.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:56:39, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> >> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >>
...
> > 2.) target updatetex2lyxtests, e.
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:29:30, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:02:08, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
> > Am 28.10.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> >
> > > > > It is only a bit
> > > > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting an
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 23:02:08, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 28.10.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
>
> > > > It is only a bit
> > > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > > > feedback on the progress.
> > > >
> > > > Vincent
> > > >
> > >
>
Am 28.10.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn :
> > > It is only a bit
> > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > > feedback on the progress.
> > >
> > > Vincent
> > >
> >
> > I don't feel guilty. I don't remember anyone saying anything about the
> > 'env'
Am 28.10.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:56:39, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
>> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Korn
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 22:49:27, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > > It is only a bit
> > > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > > feedback on the progress.
> > >
> > > Vincent
> > >
> >
> > I don't feel guilty. I don't remember anyone saying anything ab
> > It is only a bit
> > annoying that I have to wait for a long time without getting any
> > feedback on the progress.
> >
> > Vincent
> >
>
> I don't feel guilty. I don't remember anyone saying anything about the
'env' command before.
>
> What do you mean with feedback about progress?
>
> Probabl
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 21:28:29, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Op 28-10-2015 om 17:02 schreef Kornel Benko:
> > It looks like the relevant code to set environment for tests added by
> > add_test() command
> > is in the cmake-sources at lest since february 2009. Searching the net,
>
Op 28-10-2015 om 17:02 schreef Kornel Benko:
It looks like the relevant code to set environment for tests added by
add_test() command
is in the cmake-sources at lest since february 2009. Searching the net, there
are posts
mentioning cmake2.6 with this feature.
So I cannot imagine, why the patc
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:56:39PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >>
> >>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12
Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 18:56:39, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >>
> >>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 u
Am 28.10.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12:34:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
>>>
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 1
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:02:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
> > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12:34:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
> >
> > > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 11:48:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > >
> > >
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 14:33:59, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12:34:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
>
> > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 11:48:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Well yes, there is no "env" command on Windows.
>
> ...
>
> I
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Well yes, there is no "env" command on Windows.
>
> This is used in both "src/tests/CMakeLists.txt" and
> "src/tex2lyx/CMakeLists.txt".
>
> Besides that, running is a nightmare:
> - Somehow tex2lyx often deadlocks when outputting errors,
This would be a bug in
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 12:34:47, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 11:48:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
>
> > >>
> > >> Well yes, there is no "env" command on Windows.
...
I tried to remove 'env'. The attached still works for me.
> > Vincent
>
Korne
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 11:48:20, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
> >>
> >> Well yes, there is no "env" command on Windows.
> >
> > Sorry, I did not knew about this.
> >
> >> This is used in both "src/tests/CMakeLists.txt" and
> >> "src/tex2lyx/CMakeLists.txt".
> >
> > I will look into
>>
>> Well yes, there is no "env" command on Windows.
>
> Sorry, I did not knew about this.
>
>> This is used in both "src/tests/CMakeLists.txt" and
>> "src/tex2lyx/CMakeLists.txt".
>
> I will look into this. Unfortunately the 'add_test()' command does hot have a
> parameter to set the environme
Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2015 um 21:36:21, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn
>
> > When I try to compile this file via the console or directly in MSVC I
> > get always this error:
> >
> > Building Custom Rule D:/LyXGit/Master/src/tex2lyx/test/CMakeLists.txt
> > CMake does not need to re-run because
When I try to compile this file via the console or directly in MSVC I
get always this error:
Building Custom Rule D:/LyXGit/Master/src/tex2lyx/test/CMakeLists.txt
CMake does not need to re-run because
D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-result\src\tex2lyx\test\CMakeFiles\generate.stamp
is up-to-date.
Richard Heck wrote:
> Yes, I was just talking about the mention of lyx2lyx, so maybe we are at
> cross purposes. But one certainly could have two format N .lyx files and
> two format N+1 .lyx files---one each for forward and one for backward
> conversion---and test whether lyx2lyx gets you the rig
On 10/23/2015 02:17 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2015-10-22, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/22/2015 04:23 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
Maybe a suggestion to provide a minimal example of the new feature
requiring the file format change in form of a *.lyx or *.tex file that
can either be
On 2015-10-22, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 04:23 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> Maybe a suggestion to provide a minimal example of the new feature
>>> requiring the file format change in form of a *.lyx or *.tex file that
>>> can either be simply added to the test base (
Am 20.10.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> You should use the correct target for your platform.
> This 'make updatetex2lyxtests' is meant for linux.
> For Windows it may be something with appropriate solution, e.g. >
'msbuild updatetex2lyxtests.sln' (I am guessing here, Vincent will know)
Am 20.10.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Guenter Milde:
I updated the lyxformat number in the src/tex2lyx/test/*.lyx.lyx files and
now all tex2lyx tests pass here.
Commited at a0e2d48a569510dce6f3f288ee7a14e239cd4de2/lyxgit
many thanks Günther
regards Uwe
On 10/22/2015 04:23 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
Maybe a suggestion to provide a minimal example of the new feature
requiring the file format change in form of a *.lyx or *.tex file that
can either be simply added to the test base (if tex2lyx works fine) or
put on in a set of "TOD
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Maybe a suggestion to provide a minimal example of the new feature
> requiring the file format change in form of a *.lyx or *.tex file that
> can either be simply added to the test base (if tex2lyx works fine) or
> put on in a set of "TODO examples".
>
> Whether we provide
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-20, Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Just to avoid future errors: I assume that you did check before that a
>> simple update of the format number is OK, and that no tex2lyx source code
>> changes are needed? How to do such checks in described in section 2.3 of
>> Developme
On 2015-10-20, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> If you think that anything else is missing in the documentation of file
> format changes or concerning the tex2lyx tests, then please tell what you'd
> expect, and we can improve the docs.
Maybe a suggestion to provide a minimal example
On 2015-10-20, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I updated the lyxformat number in the src/tex2lyx/test/*.lyx.lyx files and
>> now all tex2lyx tests pass here.
> Very good.
> Just to avoid future errors: I assume that you did check before that a
> simple update of the format number is
Am Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 um 20:18:33, schrieb Georg Baum
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> > On 2015-10-19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >
> >> I don't understand what I made wrong. I only changed something in a
> >> module and added a fileformat change for lyx2lyx. I did not change any
> >> tex2lxy test f
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
>> I don't understand what I made wrong. I only changed something in a
>> module and added a fileformat change for lyx2lyx. I did not change any
>> tex2lxy test file nor did I change tex2lyx code.
It is all documented in Development.lyx.
Guenter Milde wrote:
> I updated the lyxformat number in the src/tex2lyx/test/*.lyx.lyx files and
> now all tex2lyx tests pass here.
Very good.
Just to avoid future errors: I assume that you did check before that a
simple update of the format number is OK, and that no tex2lyx source code
chang
On 2015-10-19, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:38:12PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> Le 19/10/2015 19:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> >Many tex2lyx tests have started to fail (before it was just 4 and we
>> >knew why and I think Günter's recent commit might have fixed them?
On 2015-10-19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 19.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>> There is some at lib/doc/Development.lyx
>>> I see lots of diffs of the form
>>> #LyX file created by tex2lyx 2.2
>>> -\lyxformat 497
>>> +\lyxformat 498
>>> and the commit ce933b1e14 has incremented the format
Am Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 um 01:04:36, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 19.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > There is some at lib/doc/Development.lyx
> >> I see lots of diffs of the form
> >>
> >> #LyX file created by tex2lyx 2.2
> >> -\lyxformat 497
> >> +\lyxformat 498
> >> and the co
Am 19.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
There is some at lib/doc/Development.lyx
I see lots of diffs of the form
#LyX file created by tex2lyx 2.2
-\lyxformat 497
+\lyxformat 498
and the commit ce933b1e14 has incremented the format to 498. Could that
alone make the tests fail?
I don
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Many tex2lyx tests have started to fail (before it was just 4 and we
> knew why and I think Günter's recent commit might have fixed them?). Now
> 14 are failing.
If you look at the differences between the test references and the actual
results you see only changed format
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:38:12PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 19/10/2015 19:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Many tex2lyx tests have started to fail (before it was just 4 and we
> >knew why and I think Günter's recent commit might have fixed them?). Now
> >14 are failing.
> >
> >Scott
> >
>
Le 19/10/2015 19:55, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
It could be. Please do not spend any time on this right now though.
Let's first see if Uwe has an idea of how to fix them.
Just making sure I'm not responsible for breaking things again :)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:12:16PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Many tex2lyx tests have started to fail (before it was just 4 and we
> knew why and I think Günter's recent commit might have fixed them?). Now
> 14 are failing.
They start failing for me because of ce933b1e.
Uwe are you able to r
Le 19/10/2015 19:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Many tex2lyx tests have started to fail (before it was just 4 and we
knew why and I think Günter's recent commit might have fixed them?). Now
14 are failing.
Scott
I would have liked to help with tests, but when I tried to run "make
alltests" b
Many tex2lyx tests have started to fail (before it was just 4 and we
knew why and I think Günter's recent commit might have fixed them?). Now
14 are failing.
Scott
49 matches
Mail list logo
