Richard Heck wrote: > Yes, I was just talking about the mention of lyx2lyx, so maybe we are at > cross purposes. But one certainly could have two format N .lyx files and > two format N+1 .lyx files---one each for forward and one for backward > conversion---and test whether lyx2lyx gets you the right results both > times. Or we could just focus on the forward conversion, which is a lot > more important to most people.
Having tests for the forward lyx2lyx conversion would already be a big improvement. This would also allow changes in the lyx2lyx infrastructure. Those are impossible to do now, because we do not have tests to ensure that older conversions do still work. Georg