On Tuesday 27 June 2006 09:14, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Well, it seems that the prospect of doing a joke overshadowed the
> prospect of looking stupid. I know what an harmonic series is. At
> least I am supposed to.
I do too but I must confess here that I have not yet calculated all its
te
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Monday 26 June 2006 21:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The difference is that harmonic series are difficult to predict
>> because they alternate between positive and negative contributions
>> to the sum.
Jose'> Although its
On Monday 26 June 2006 21:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> The difference is that harmonic series are difficult to predict
> because they alternate between positive and negative contributions to
> the sum.
Although its name is harmonic all the series terms are positive (and
decreasing).
h
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You do not know how trivial some of these things are.
Jose'> I know my to do list and it has lots of trivial stuff. After
Jose'> all even the harmonic series diverges, and most of those terms
Jose'> are really trivial. ;-)
The differe
On Monday 26 June 2006 17:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Do you want to bet?
I can always apply forecast from my research. ;-)
> You do not know how trivial some of these things are.
I know my to do list and it has lots of trivial stuff. After all even the
harmonic series diverges, and
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Monday 26 June 2006 17:44, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Yes. I hope to have time to finish some of mine this summer.
Jose'> Famous last words. ;-)
Do you want to bet? You do not know how trivial some of these things are.
JMa
On Monday 26 June 2006 17:44, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes. I hope to have time to finish some of mine this summer.
Famous last words. ;-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Georg> It is in trunk now. What about 1.4?
>> OK, it can go in. But I have to say I do not like at all the
>> find("int") in the original code...
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> It is in trunk now. What about 1.4?
>
> OK, it can go in. But I have to say I do not like at all the
> find("int") in the original code...
Me neither, but I did not want to touch it. So
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> It is in trunk now. What about 1.4?
OK, it can go in. But I have to say I do not like at all the
find("int") in the original code...
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> writes:
>>
>> Georg> This patch adds support for \intop and \ointop. It goes in
>> Georg> later if nobody objects.
>>
>> Georg> Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? I think it is safe.
>>
>>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> This patch adds support for \intop and \ointop. It goes in
> Georg> later if nobody objects.
>
> Georg> Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? I think it is safe.
>
> Why not just
>
> \def\intop{\in
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just found out that Lyx does not know the Latex command \limits
>> which produces the limits of integrals etc. above and below the
>> integral operator. Maybe it is worthwhile to implement it. W
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found out that Lyx does not know the Latex command \limits which
> produces the limits of integrals etc. above and below the integral
> operator. Maybe it is worthwhile to implement it. With regard to tex2lyx
> it may be useful as well, as \intop which is
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
>> Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
>>> I just found out that Lyx does not know the Latex command \limits
>>> which produces the limits of integrals etc. above and below the
>>> integral operator. Maybe it is worthwhile to implement it. With regard
>>> to te
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
Joost Verburg wrote:
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
I just found out that Lyx does not know the Latex command \limits
which produces the limits of integrals etc. above and below the
integral operator. Maybe it is worthwhile to implement it. With
regard to tex2lyx it may be
Joost Verburg wrote:
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
I just found out that Lyx does not know the Latex command \limits
which produces the limits of integrals etc. above and below the
integral operator. Maybe it is worthwhile to implement it. With regard
to tex2lyx it may be useful as well, as \intop
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
I just found out that Lyx does not know the Latex command \limits which
produces the limits of integrals etc. above and below the integral
operator. Maybe it is worthwhile to implement it. With regard to tex2lyx
it may be useful as well, as \intop which is an alias for
Hi,
I just found out that Lyx does not know the Latex command \limits which
produces the limits of integrals etc. above and below the integral
operator. Maybe it is worthwhile to implement it. With regard to tex2lyx
it may be useful as well, as \intop which is an alias for \int\limits.
Cheer
19 matches
Mail list logo
