Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> writes:
>>
>> Georg> This patch adds support for \intop and \ointop. It goes in
>> Georg> later if nobody objects.
>>
>> Georg> Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? I think it is safe.
>>
>> Why not just
>>
>> \def\intop{\int\limits}
>>
>> ?
>
> Because it does not work. The reason is that the definition is only used
> for displaying the int sign, but the decision whether to place the scripts
> besides or below/above the int sign is made in MathScriptInset, and that
> does not know that \intop is displayed like \int\limits.
It is in trunk now. What about 1.4?
Georg
