On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:20:05PM -0700, Bo Peng wrote:
> $ lyx
> kpathsea: Running mktexfmt latex.fmt
> fmtutil: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex
This should not occur by simply launching lyx. Seems your tetex
installation is corrupted. After a fresh install of tetex I ha
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:50:13AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >Yes, you have a native Win32 version of pplatex.exe in your PATH.
> >Move it out of the way or use a cygwin version.
>
> I have uninstalled miktex (which was installed with my win32/lyx) and
> platex no longer exists. The problem persists
Yes, you have a native Win32 version of pplatex.exe in your PATH.
Move it out of the way or use a cygwin version.
I have uninstalled miktex (which was installed with my win32/lyx) and
platex no longer exists. The problem persists.
Can anyone try lyx with the latest cygwin tetex?
Bo
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:20:05PM -0700, Bo Peng wrote:
> >> Do you have the missing classes problem?
> >
> >No, I use MikTeX, have fake packages for tetex to fool setup.exe,
> >and an environment set up such that if you check for tetex you
>
> It looks like a tetex problem. I see Latex not usabl
> Do you have the missing classes problem?
No, I use MikTeX, have fake packages for tetex to fool setup.exe,
and an environment set up such that if you check for tetex you
It looks like a tetex problem. I see Latex not usable (not LaTeX2e)
from configure.py output. Any idea?
Bo
$ lyx
kpathsea
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:01:44PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >Perhaps I will split the package into lyx-common, lyx-qtwin, and
> >lyx-xforms in order to avoid the clash. Or, better, I could make
> >your package a prerequisite (it would play the role of lyx-common)
> >such that I have to package only
You made a mistake in the packaging.
This is obvious. :-)
The archive contains the file
/etc/postinstall/lyx.sh/lyx.sh
so the script lyx.sh is in the wrong location. It should have been
directly in /etc/postinstall.
I also found it out.
Perhaps I will split the package into lyx-common, l
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:30:35PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> Dear lyxers,
>
> Lyx 1.4.3 has just become one of the official cygwin packages. Here is
> the announcement from cygwin-announce:
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2006-10/msg2.html .
Well done, Bo!
> I just tried to install
Dear lyxers,
Lyx 1.4.3 has just become one of the official cygwin packages. Here is
the announcement from cygwin-announce:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2006-10/msg2.html .
I just tried to install lyx through cygwin. Lyx starts fine but
complains about missing texclass book. I gue
