Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Having just read README.MacOSX, I went and looked at
> Angus> the patch that we must apply to the Qt sources
> Angus> patch lyx on this platform.
> Angus> There are two changes that must be made. The first
> Angus> one looks like a simple oversight on Qt's part
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Having just read README.MacOSX, I went and looked at the patch
Angus> that we must apply to the Qt sources in order to build lyx on
Angus> this platform.
Angus> There are two changes that must be made. The first one looks
Angus> li
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:45:58PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > simple oversight on Qt's part. Has anybody reported this to Qt so
> > > that they can merge the patch into their sources?
> >
> > It would be good if somebody did
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 5:39 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > simple oversight on Qt's part. Has anybody reported this to Qt so
> > that they can merge the patch into their sources?
>
> It would be good if somebody did.
You've done this in t
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> simple oversight on Qt's part. Has anybody reported this to Qt so
> that they can merge the patch into their sources?
It would be good if somebody did.
> The second change is, IMO, our fault.
I don't believe so. They're the librar
Having just read README.MacOSX, I went and looked at the patch that we
must apply to the Qt sources in order to build lyx on this platform.
There are two changes that must be made. The first one looks like a
simple oversight on Qt's part. Has anybody reported this to Qt so
that they can merge the
