On Tuesday 18 May 2004 5:39 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > simple oversight on Qt's part. Has anybody reported this to Qt so > > that they can merge the patch into their sources? > > It would be good if somebody did.
You've done this in the past I believe. Could I get you to do it one more time? Knowing the ropes and all that. And as you're not known for getting irritated by bureaucratic jobsworths ;-) > > The second change is, IMO, our fault. > > I don't believe so. They're the library, we're the application. > They're polluting a global namespace without even their awful QFoo > thing. Let me re-phrase that then. We're using a library whose API we know, even if we don't love it. Writing code that won't compile against that library is a little... silly. Angus
