Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

Thanks! 2014-08-29 10:21 GMT+02:00 Stephan Witt : > Am 27.08.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Stephan Witt : > > > Am 27.08.2014 um 15:57 schrieb Richard Heck : > > > >> On 08/27/2014 09:35 AM, Paweł Doligalski wrote: > >>> Hello everybody, > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, very simmilar crash just happened to me

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

Am 27.08.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Stephan Witt : > Am 27.08.2014 um 15:57 schrieb Richard Heck : > >> On 08/27/2014 09:35 AM, Paweł Doligalski wrote: >>> Hello everybody, >>> >>> Unfortunately, very simmilar crash just happened to me again, this time on >>> LyX 2.1.1. Just as in the previous case,

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

On 08/28/2014 04:47 AM, Will Furnass wrote: I encountered what appears to be a similar problem to bug #9049 over the weekend where copying a table with some multi-column cells from a UTF-8 encoded file in one instance of LyX to another instance of LyX caused file corruption when the file pasted i

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

de. I enclose the incorrectly saved file (temp notes bugged.lyx) as well >>> as the original file I recovered (temp notes original.lyx). As far as I can >>> tell, the original file shows well how the file looked like just before the >>> crash. >>> >>> I

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

> Am 27.08.2014 um 15:57 schrieb Richard Heck : > >> On 08/27/2014 09:35 AM, Paweł Doligalski wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> Unfortunately, very simmilar crash just happened to me again, this time on >> LyX 2.1.1. Just as in the previous case, LyX crashed and there was a data >> loss. However

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

On 08/27/2014 09:35 AM, Paweł Doligalski wrote: Hello everybody, Unfortunately, very simmilar crash just happened to me again, this time on LyX 2.1.1. Just as in the previous case, LyX crashed and there was a data loss. However, this time the corrupted file does not end with "\begin_inset Tab

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

Am 22.08.2014 um 16:32 schrieb Paweł Doligalski : > Thanks! What do you mean by Crash Log protocol? If a program on a Mac crashes normally you see the Crash Log and get asked if it should be send to Apple. The Crash Log itself is stored somewhere in your user directory. One possibility to loc

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

ws well how the file looked like just before the crash. I was using LyX 2.1.0. on Mac OS 10.9.4. Let me know if I can give you any more information about my configuration. Since I was using obsolete version of LyX, it's possible that the bug has already been corrected. However, I couldn&

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

Thanks! What do you mean by Crash Log protocol? If you mean running LyX via terminal and sending you the output, then there is the same problem as you encountered while solving the bug: I do not know what triggers the crash. 2014-08-22 15:54 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > Crash Log protocol

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Look at bug #9049, I may fit. > > If it matches (I think so), please attach your Crash Log protocol or send it > to the list. Yes please do so. If you want a quick recap (from what I understand), LyX 2.1.1 improves on the bug in the sense t

Re: LyX 2.1.0 on Mac incorrectly saves a file

well how the file looked like just before the > crash. > > I was using LyX 2.1.0. on Mac OS 10.9.4. Let me know if I can give you any > more information about my configuration. > > Since I was using obsolete version of LyX, it's possible that the bug has > already

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On 30.05.2014 17:53, Paul A. Rubin wrote: I just lost two to three days of work when LyX 2.1.0 crashed. I have no idea what triggered the crash (I think I had just clicked into the middle of a line) and cannot reproduce it. Both the document file and the emergency file are identically corrupted

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On 05/30/2014 02:28 PM, Richard Heck wrote: I think we should enable "save backups" by default at this point. Probably not a bad idea, although in my case it would not have mattered. Sometime long ago, when floppy disks ruled (and were actually floppy), I got in the habit of turning off time

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On 05/30/2014 02:26 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: I don't know if this is relevant, but did you have continuous spell check enabled? I think the other report I remember about this did have it. And the other question is whether you have word-completion enabled. I'm skeptical the cause is there, ho

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On 05/30/2014 02:26 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: I don't know if this is relevant, but did you have continuous spell check enabled? I think the other report I remember about this did have it. Scott Yes, continuous spell check is on (using what I think is the default setting, Enchant). Paul

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On 05/30/2014 02:18 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: On 05/30/2014 12:26 PM, Richard Heck wrote: Do the corrupted files end with "\begin_inset Tabular"? Yes. So I gather this is nothing new (or else you're an incredibly lucky guesser). No, not new. But we've had a very difficult time debugging it

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > On 05/30/2014 12:26 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> >> >> Do the corrupted files end with "\begin_inset Tabular"? > > Yes. So I gather this is nothing new (or else you're an incredibly lucky > guesser). > >> Do you have auto-completion on? > > Y

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On 05/30/2014 12:26 PM, Richard Heck wrote: Do the corrupted files end with "\begin_inset Tabular"? Yes. So I gather this is nothing new (or else you're an incredibly lucky guesser). Do you have auto-completion on? Yes for math, no for text. How about auto-save, which is at Toos> Preferences

Re: LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

On 05/30/2014 11:53 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: I just lost two to three days of work when LyX 2.1.0 crashed. I have no idea what triggered the crash (I think I had just clicked into the middle of a line) and cannot reproduce it. Both the document file and the emergency file are identically

LyX 2.1.0 fatal crash

I just lost two to three days of work when LyX 2.1.0 crashed. I have no idea what triggered the crash (I think I had just clicked into the middle of a line) and cannot reproduce it. Both the document file and the emergency file are identically corrupted (truncated). Both are 13.0 KB; the correct

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

2014-05-08 21:53 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri : > I am not a beamer user, but I think that what scares others is the fact > that they were used to a certain workflow. Maybe restoring that workflow > would help. For example, what about a new "Container" property for a > layout? A layout with that pr

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

Nah, Liviu, thanks for the suggestion but downgrading is never a good solution. I have been working this whole week with Beamer on 2.1 and let's say that the new UI is the least of my concerns. ;) - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Thu, May 8, 2

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Julio Rojas wrote: > I feel your pain Richard, I really do. Unfortunately, I am in a phase of my > academic life in which everything is on the "production" branch, so testing > of Lyx RC's for my documents was a big no-no. Couldn't risk loosing time. > So, sad as it

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:13:53PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > That said, it would be great if those of us who use Beamer extensively could > come up with some concrete ideas about how the UI should work. Jurgen did > the hard work. This should just be tweaking, though perhaps the absolutely >

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

I feel your pain Richard, I really do. Unfortunately, I am in a phase of my academic life in which everything is on the "production" branch, so testing of Lyx RC's for my documents was a big no-no. Couldn't risk loosing time. So, sad as it seems, I only noticed these changes after Ubuntu asked me i

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

On 05/08/2014 02:51 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: Maybe for beginners it wouldn't be a bad idea. Alt-P Shift-Return is faster for experienced users, though. No, this was not intended for beginners. The need of individual separator makes the document more fragile and more cumbersome

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

Julio Rojas wrote: > Maybe for beginners it wouldn't be a bad idea. Alt-P Shift-Return is faster > for experienced users, though. No, this was not intended for beginners. The need of individual separator makes the document more fragile and more cumbersome in 90% of cases. Fragile because it's ea

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

> > Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the > previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still want to > go that way)? Maybe for beginners it wouldn't be a bad idea. Alt-P Shift-Return is faster for experienced users, though. --

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Let me just rephrase that we cannot go back to the > 2.0 UI (for the technical reasons I have explained in previous posts) and Another wild idea: what about adding new frame environment containing the previous separator by default (kind of 2.0 behaviour if user still w

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > All feedback is received and noted. I tried to fight new beamer ui yesterday and I noticed these points: - suggested trick to create new frame alt+p+(shift)+return is not really helpfull is most cases. Typical situation - I want to create new frame after finishing

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

2014-05-08 12:37 GMT+02:00 Murat Yildizoglu: > We had in the recent past some abusive criticisms in the list, but that > should not make us immediately adopt a defensive discourse when a new > criticism appears, especially if it is constructive and detailed as here. > Let me stress, in case it ha

Re: Beamer in Lyx 2.1.0

Hi to all, I have already signaled, some time ago I think, that this behaviour is somewhat cumbersome, and that the students (doctoral and post-doctoral students) to whom I was teaching LyX as a general front end to everything (R, PDF, etc.) were somewhat baffled by the operations necessary t

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.1.0 Released

On 04/28/2014 05:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 25.04.2014 17:54, schrieb Richard Heck: The LyX development team is pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.1.0. Hi Richard, LyX 2.1 was already mentioned in Germany's largest PC magazine: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Freie-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.1.0 Released

Am 25.04.2014 17:54, schrieb Richard Heck: The LyX development team is pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.1.0. Hi Richard, LyX 2.1 was already mentioned in Germany's largest PC magazine: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Freie-LaTeX-Umgebung-LyX-2-1-erschienen-2178581.htm

[ANNOUNCE] LyX 2.1.0 Released

The LyX development team is pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.1.0. This release represents the result of more than three years of hard work. Many bugs have been fixed, and several new features have been added. The new features in LyX 2.1 are detailed in http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

24/04/2014 14:41, Alessandro Di Federico: On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release. Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're going to have the fourth

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before > announcing the release. Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're going to have the fourth LyX Workshop here at POuL and we are wil

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Hi all, > > The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at > Ubuntu packages are now available on the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/release Liviu > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ &g

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Am 16.04.2014 17:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: you can find the installers for LyX 2.1.0 here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/ (I'll add the installer improvements we discussed the next days as soon as I find the time.) Hello Vincent, I foun

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Stephan Witt schreef op 17-4-2014 8:17: Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : Hi all, The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the re

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Am 18.04.2014 um 07:55 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > Jerry wrote: >> On Apr 16, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : >>> The package for mac is here: >>> >>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Jerry wrote: > On Apr 16, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : > > The package for mac is here: > > > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg > > https://dl.dropboxuse

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

On Apr 16, 2014, at 11:17 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : > >> Hi all, >> >> The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at >> >> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ >> >> As

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Am 14.04.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : > Hi all, > > The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ > > As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before > announcing the rel

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 16-4-2014 0:58: Am 14.04.2014 19:47, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Hi all, The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release.

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

On Monday 14 April 2014 19:47:13 Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Hi all, > > The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ > > As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before > announc

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Am 14.04.2014 19:47, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Hi all, The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release. Hello Vincent, you can find the insta

Old-style tabulars, \raisebox and uglyness in general (was: Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP)

14/04/2014 23:44, Pavel Sanda: Standard ubuntu install is no more able to produce pdf from math manual due to missing mathtools.sty. Not sure how much is this package exotic or it's just my install at my institute. On my local ubuntu install it is OK, but I agree it needs to be put in depend

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at > > > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ > > > > As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Hi all, > > The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ > > As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before > announcing the release. Standard ubuntu install i

Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

Hi all, The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/ As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release. Vincent

Master closed for final release of LyX 2.1.0

In preparation of the final release, please do not commit to master. Vincent

Re: Last call for translations and layout translations review for LyX 2.1.0

2014-04-09 22:04 GMT+02:00 Georg Baum: > "Chart" => "Diagramm" > "Graph[[mathematical]]" => "Graph" > Makes sense. Got for it. Jürgen

Re: Last call for translations and layout translations review for LyX 2.1.0

Pavel Sanda schreef op 9-4-2014 5:51: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Dear translators, Vincent, most of the string in nl section seem to be translated, except of Listings - can you check? layouttranslations.review: nl: "Acknowledgement", "Case", "Chart", (same translation as "Graph") "Claim",

Re: LyX 2.1.0

2014-04-09 10:57 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > Yes. Thanks. > Done. Jürgen > > Vincent >

LyX 2.1.0 -- Update

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. > > - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are > going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left > without further

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-09 10:55 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> Ok, I (or someone else) will proceed then. Thanks for the understanding. > > > I can do that. I will add a comment. OK? > > Jürgen > >> >> >> Vincent > > Yes. Thanks. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1.0

2014-04-09 10:55 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > Ok, I (or someone else) will proceed then. Thanks for the understanding. > I can do that. I will add a comment. OK? Jürgen > > Vincent >

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-09 10:09 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> I want to propose to disable this feature for now. Then, as soon as >> possible we replace the error by a warning when we detect a BibTeX >> error stating that in the future this wi

Re: LyX 2.1.0

09/04/2014 10:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller: I am fine with that: disable the feature and think how to resolve the problems with it within the next cycle (I think there are alternatives to what you propose, but it needs time and testing). Having support for warnings would be great in general. JMarc

Re: LyX 2.1.0

2014-04-09 10:09 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > I want to propose to disable this feature for now. Then, as soon as > possible we replace the error by a warning when we detect a BibTeX > error stating that in the future this will lead to an error. > > Then, if we succeed to quickly release th

Re: LyX 2.1.0

09/04/2014 10:09, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I want to propose to disable this feature for now. Then, as soon as possible we replace the error by a warning when we detect a BibTeX error stating that in the future this will lead to an error. Then, if we succeed to quickly release the next major rele

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> - Documents not compiling anymore because of BibTeX errors. We already >> received a lot of reports and this can prohibit people from updating. > > > You can still decide to disable

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >> 2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >> You can still decide to disable this feature (probably as easy as removing >> BIBTEX_ERROR from the ERROR declaration in LaTeX.h:142). Fiddling with the >> f

Re: Last call for translations and layout translations review for LyX 2.1.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Dear translators, Vincent, most of the string in nl section seem to be translated, except of Listings - can you check? layouttranslations.review: nl: "Acknowledgement", "Case", "Chart", (same translation as "Graph") "Claim", "Condition", "Conjecture", "Corollar

Re: LyX 2.1.0

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > You can still decide to disable this feature (probably as easy as removing > BIBTEX_ERROR from the ERROR declaration in LaTeX.h:142). Fiddling with the > feature itself makes no sense at this stage, IMHO. > > >>

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014 um 11:38:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > Will commit then. This change effects naming of packages created with target > > 'package' or 'package_source' of cmake. > > > > Probably I am the only one using it? > > > > I don't expect any trouble, but even then, it is

Re: LyX 2.1.0

2014-04-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > - Documents not compiling anymore because of BibTeX errors. We already > received a lot of reports and this can prohibit people from updating. > You can still decide to disable this feature (probably as easy as removing BIBTEX_ERROR from the ER

Re: LyX 2.1.0

> I did both now. > > JMarc > Thanks, Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1.0

08/04/2014 11:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I mean, Yes, please add me to the alias, and Yes, please forward the unprocessed messages. I did both now. JMarc

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck > >> > > That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what > >> > > >> > > exactly the best > >> > > >> > > way to do it is. > >> > > >> > I think the attached patc

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >>> At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. >>> >>> - As it seems that nearly all comm

Re: LyX 2.1.0

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. >> >> - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are >> going solely by private mail by Uw

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Sonntag, 6. April 2014 um 13:13:08, schrieb Richard Heck > > > That sort of patch is fine with me, once all of you figure out what > > > > > exactly the best > > > > > way to do it is. > > > > I think the attached patch is ready for 2.1.1-staging + 2.2-staging > > > > I don't know enough about

Re: LyX 2.1.0

08/04/2014 11:19, Vincent van Ravesteijn: At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left without further notice after sending his last

LyX 2.1.0

At the moment I've a few issues left that I think need some consideration. - As it seems that nearly all communications with the translators are going solely by private mail by Uwe, and as Uwe apparently left without further notice after sending his last e-mails, I've no clue on what translations

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

On 04/06/2014 09:51 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 16:41:24, schrieb Richard Heck > On 03/26/2014 04:28 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 21:08:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > > > ... > > > > > Isn't there a dynamic way to d

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 16:41:24, schrieb Richard Heck > On 03/26/2014 04:28 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 21:08:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > > > ... > > > > > Isn't there a dynamic way to do this. Parse configure.py or something ? > > Yes, there

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 21:55:59, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > Kornel Benko schreef op 26-3-2014 21:28: > > > > Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 21:08:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > > > > > > Kornel Benko schreef op 26-3-2014 20:59: > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/CMakeLists.t

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Kornel Benko schreef op 26-3-2014 21:28: Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 21:08:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > Kornel Benko schreef op 26-3-2014 20:59: > > > diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt > > index 023c3e1..037fb4a 100644 > > --- a/CMakeLists.txt > > +++ b/CMakeLists.t

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

On 03/26/2014 04:28 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 21:08:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > Kornel Benko schreef op 26-3-2014 20:59: > > > diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt > > index 023c3e1..037fb4a 100644 > > --- a/CMakeLists.txt > > +++ b/CMakeList

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 21:08:42, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > Kornel Benko schreef op 26-3-2014 20:59: > > > diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt > > index 023c3e1..037fb4a 100644 > > --- a/CMakeLists.txt > > +++ b/CMakeLists.txt > > @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ > > > > cmake_minimum_

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Kornel Benko schreef op 26-3-2014 20:59: diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index 023c3e1..037fb4a 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/CMakeLists.txt @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6.4) -set(LYX_PROJECT LyX) +#needed to distinguish from trunk, so we can install

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014 um 15:52:49, schrieb Richard Heck > > I need a one-liner to go into branch 2.1, but not into trunk (== master) > > > > So where should it go in? Have I to wait for the branch? > > > > In principle, that would go into 2.1.1-staging. Please post it. > > Richard OK.

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > LyX 2.1.0rc1 is ready. I'm waiting for one small issue before I will > > > > > announce the release. > > > > > > > > > > From now on, updates to the translations and documentation c

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

; > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > LyX 2.1.0rc1 is ready. I'm waiting for one small issue before I will > > > > > announce the release. > > > > > > > > > > From now on, updates to the translations and documenta

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

; > > LyX 2.1.0rc1 is ready. I'm waiting for one small issue before I will > > > > > announce the release. > > > > > > > > > > From now on, updates to the translations and documentation can go in > > > > > master. Other fixes will nee

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

s and documentation can go in > master. Other fixes will need to be ok'ed by me. The goal is to release > LyX 2.1.0 as is (if no severe issues pop up in the meantime). I don't get it. What is the master here? Branch 2.1-staging? No. master is branch master. 2.2-staging is ope

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

ther fixes will need to be ok'ed by me. The goal is to release > LyX 2.1.0 as is (if no severe issues pop up in the meantime). I don't get it. What is the master here? Branch 2.1-staging? > I want to keep this period as short as possible, so I am aiming to > prepare for the final

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

will need to be ok'ed by me. The goal is to release LyX 2.1.0 as is (if no severe issues pop up in the meantime). I want to keep this period as short as possible, so I am aiming to prepare for the final release of LyX 2.1.0 in the first weekend of April. Have we frozen strings an

Re: Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

goal is to release LyX 2.1.0 as is (if no severe issues pop up in the meantime). I want to keep this period as short as possible, so I am aiming to prepare for the final release of LyX 2.1.0 in the first weekend of April. Have we frozen strings and notified translators? If not, there is a typo

Master branch partially opened for LyX 2.1.0

Hi all, LyX 2.1.0rc1 is ready. I'm waiting for one small issue before I will announce the release. From now on, updates to the translations and documentation can go in master. Other fixes will need to be ok'ed by me. The goal is to release LyX 2.1.0 as is (if no severe issues pop

Re: Freeze for LyX 2.1.0 beta2

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef op 10-11-2013 12:17: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last changes introduce any regressions. The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare the tarballs. When there are

Re: Freeze for LyX 2.1.0 beta2

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last > changes introduce any regressions. > > The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare > the tarballs. When there are no big problems, I can tag and releas

Freeze for LyX 2.1.0 beta2

Hi all, I want to freeze the master and to evaluate a few days whether the last changes introduce any regressions. The coming days I will be at the GSoC mentor summit, and I will prepare the tarballs. When there are no big problems, I can tag and release the second beta after the weekend.

Re: Shell script to compile and install LyX-2.1.0 from git on Fedora

On 2012-11-03 23:14, Kayvan Sylvan wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've tested this on Fedora 15, 16, and 17. The Fedora 17 system was a > clean install on VirtualBox, after which I ran my script. > > The basic idea: > > lyx-build init # installs needed packages and sets up the rpmbuild dir > lyx-build r

Re: Shell script to compile and install LyX-2.1.0 from git on Fedora

Thanks. Here's the patch for lyx-fedora in devel. On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/03/2012 09:37 PM, Kayvan Sylvan wrote: > >> Hmmm Yes, that seems to be an old script based on the procedure in >> http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/**ReleaseProcedure

Re: Shell script to compile and install LyX-2.1.0 from git on Fedora

On 11/03/2012 09:37 PM, Kayvan Sylvan wrote: Hmmm Yes, that seems to be an old script based on the procedure in http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseProcedure which is tied to the old subversion repo. Actually, I wrote it when I became release manager for 2.0.x. It's up to date now for git, o

Re: Shell script to compile and install LyX-2.1.0 from git on Fedora

Hmmm Yes, that seems to be an old script based on the procedure in http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseProcedure which is tied to the old subversion repo. I'll rename my script to lyx-fedora instead, and you can include it in the same place (development/tools). Here it is, slightly modified. O

Re: Shell script to compile and install LyX-2.1.0 from git on Fedora

On 11/03/2012 09:01 PM, Kayvan Sylvan wrote: The latest version of this script (lyx-build) is always available at the following URL: http://www.box.com/kslyx Probably not an issue, but there is a script called "lyx-build" in the source tree, at development/tools/. I doubt there could be a con

  1   2   >