> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I see. I would advise then to open a bug report on
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
> Have you tried to copy `~/.config/ibus` from the user that works to
> the user where LyX crashes? And can you confirm that wher
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>> "Liviu" == Liviu Andronic writes:
>
> Hello Liviu
>> Dear Uwe,
>> The 1.6.x branch is no longer maintained, so it is very unlikely that
>> this issue could be solved for you. I would advise updating to 2.1.x
>> via the PPA:
>
>> "Liviu" == Liviu Andronic writes:
Hello Liviu
> Dear Uwe,
> The 1.6.x branch is no longer maintained, so it is very unlikely that
> this issue could be solved for you. I would advise updating to 2.1.x
> via the PPA:
> https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release
Tha
Dear Uwe,
The 1.6.x branch is no longer maintained, so it is very unlikely that
this issue could be solved for you. I would advise updating to 2.1.x
via the PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release
Regards,
Liviu
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Hello
>
Hello
I know this is ancient software I use, but it worked till recently:
- user 2 newly created without problems
- user 1 with tons of configuration files can:
Start lyx create a new file, but if he wants to type something lyx
crashes with the following error message.
,
|
| In
hi there thanks for your email. the new version seemed to have removed the
problem and everything is working wellagain thanks for your time
> From: t...@lyx.org
> To: vladimirplac...@msn.com; uwesto...@web.de
> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:46:59 +
> Subject: Re: #6918: Lyx 1.6.7
ill happen. So I hope,
you're
using it with copies of your important documents.
> It installs and runs fine, but as best I can tell there is no automated
> import of LyX 1.6.7 settings.
Yes, the automated import is on the agenda only.
The needed scripts are unfinished or at le
On 10/25/2010 12:42 PM, Klaus-Peter Reimers wrote:
Moin from Kiel, Germany !
I installed lyx 1.6.7 from sources on an UBUNTU 10.4, which had 1.6.5
already installed, configured --with-version-suffix. When importing a
large bunch of LaTeX-sources into 1.6.7 indirectly (the construction is a
Moin from Kiel, Germany !
I installed lyx 1.6.7 from sources on an UBUNTU 10.4, which had 1.6.5
already installed, configured --with-version-suffix. When importing a
large bunch of LaTeX-sources into 1.6.7 indirectly (the construction is a.
little bit tricky, hard to be explained and unnecessary
Hello,
I saw a LyX 1.6.7 crash during spellchecking (on a Debian sqeeze system). I
cannot reproduce the crash though. Not sure if the trace is useful to help
debugging, if not, please ignore.
Thanks,
Rainer
*** glibc detected *** lyx: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x0a3d9738
Hossein Noorikhah wrote:
> Please see:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6909
[...]
> Please see:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6910
Thanks.
[...]
> > If the problem you describe occurs after such a language switch, it's a
> > bug,
> > if you expect LyX to detect the language automatically, i
Hi Jürgen,
Hossein Noorikhah wrote:
> > *LyX bugs:*
> > 1. Wrong Shaping: '«' and '»' are shown in wrong manner (reverse), but
> they
> > appear correctly in the output. Please see the attached picture.
>
> Please file a bug report for this on http://www.lyx.org/trac/. This looks
> like
> a cosmet
Hello Hossein,
Hossein Noorikhah wrote:
> *LyX bugs:*
> 1. Wrong Shaping: '«' and '»' are shown in wrong manner (reverse), but they
> appear correctly in the output. Please see the attached picture.
Please file a bug report for this on http://www.lyx.org/trac/. This looks like
a cosmetic problem
Hi,
I've started translating LyX introduction (intro.lyx) into Persian, and I'm
using builtin Farsi support that uses Arabi package. There are some bugs in
Farsi support that I've encountered, and I try to list those that are most
important. I'm using LyX 1.6.7 on win32.
Some
Hello Rob
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also be
> happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the betas
> yet?). To prevent it from destroying your system, though, I would need to
> patch
Just updated as well with Lucid. Works well. Thanks for the ppa.
On 08/17/2010 11:45 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
Dear LyX Users and Developers,
I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu
packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX).
I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, a
2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda :
> Rob Oakes wrote:
>> Dear LyX Users and Developers,
>
> firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
> is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
> policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6
Just installed 1.6.7 on my laptop (Mint Isadora/Ubuntu Lucid). Many thanks!
/Paul
I'll see what I can do. Those are both strong points. Fortunately, the next
version of Ubuntu (due in October) will ship with the latest version of LyX.
I've also created the packages on Launchpad, so I think it's just a matter of
getting them incorporated.
On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Pavel
Rob Oakes wrote:
> I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of
> Ubuntu. Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :(
> But it never hurts to ask.
you can argue by the fact that this is no update, but rather bugfix of very
unstable package gi
I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of
Ubuntu. Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :( But
it never hurts to ask.
Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the
instructions in the original email. Once a user a
Rob Oakes wrote:
> Dear LyX Users and Developers,
firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7
automatically updated through
Dear LyX Users and Developers,
I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu
packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX).
I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our
request to include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick
Meerkat, 10.1
Le 9 août 10 à 00:16, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
More exactly, everytime the toolbar ui config file is changed; then
the Qt session information is reset. So if "make install" copy this
file thus losing date information, instead of merely updating it if
needed, you session will be reset.
I
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES writes:
> > It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
> > like every time I do a "make install", I lose some session information
> > like toolbar position (on a mac).
> >
> > How come i
Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES writes:
> It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
> like every time I do a "make install", I lose some session information
> like toolbar position (on a mac).
>
> How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that
> is differ
Helge Hafting writes:
> Removing .lyx/ did not help. So I used "strace" to find the difference
> between the two users.
>
> I found there is also a per-user .config/LyX/ directory. I removed this,
> and now LyX worked fine!
It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
li
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
Hi,
> Any idea what might have happened?
I guess I should've forwarded
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332
but I never found a way to reproduce it. :(
And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the iss
I started up Debian's lyx 1.6.7 today. The menus didn't work. Neither
did they work for my self-compiled lyxes. Very strange. The main menu
was there, but it was impossible to pull anything down!
So I logged in as another user, and LyX worked fine there. So, a user
setup problem.
Is it the same, or am I
>>> using a wrong version ?
>>
>> It is the same version. LyX 1.6.7 was build on July 11th. Doe to some
>> problems with build systems and compilers it was announced some days later.
>> As my compiler and build system was not affected by th
Am 21.07.2010 um 14:38 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Am 21.07.2010 11:27, schrieb Olivier Ripoll:
>
>> Just a quick question though: The 4.25 installer is dated July
>> 11th, while 1.6.7 was announced on July 15th. Is it the same, or am I
>> using a wrong version ?
>
> It
James C. Sutherland wrote:
> Sorry all - false alarm. For whatever reason, when I installed 1.6.7, the
> default LyX switched to 2.0alpha4 on my system, and I did not notice this.
>
> So it turns out that scrolling and dialogue boxes work fine in 1.6.7.
Glad to hear that.
Jürgen
, William Bray wrote:
> I installed Lyx 1.6.7 on my mac running OSX 10.6.4 and encounter no
> problems with mouse scrolling. I have not experimented with Lyx 2.0 as yet.
>
> bill
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM, James C. Sutherland <
> james.sutherl...@utah.edu>
resolve the first issue ;)
The screenshot is definitely LyX 2.x. The spellchecker of LyX 1.6.7 does not
have a language combo.
Jürgen
James C. Sutherland wrote:
> Bennett,
>
> The problem shows up for me when I undock the dialogue window. When docked,
> there is no problem. And yes, this problem is in 1.6.7.
please go to Help->About LyX and report version. this dialog really looks from
2.0.
it would alos nicely resolve the f
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:24 AM, BH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, James C. Sutherland
> wrote:
> > Another regression on Mac: some of the dialogue boxes (e.g. the spell
> check
> > dialogue box) is not rendered properly. See the attached image.
> Resizing
> > it does not help. Thi
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, James C. Sutherland
wrote:
> Another regression on Mac: some of the dialogue boxes (e.g. the spell check
> dialogue box) is not rendered properly. See the attached image. Resizing
> it does not help. This was also a problem that I noticed in 2.0 alpha on
> the
James C. Sutherland wrote:
> It appears that mouse scrolling is broken on the Mac for LyX 1.6.7. This
> same problem is present in the alpha versions of 2.0 on the Mac, and it
> looks like it slipped through the cracks for this release.
I wasn't aware of that. But there seems to be
It appears that mouse scrolling is broken on the Mac for LyX 1.6.7. This
same problem is present in the alpha versions of 2.0 on the Mac, and it
looks like it slipped through the cracks for this release.
Any chance of a patch being released in the very near future to fix this
serious regression
Public release of LyX version 1.6.7
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.7. This is the eighth
maintenance release in the 1.6.x series.
From the list of fixes and improvements, we'd like to highlight
particularly that this release irons ou
On 7/13/2010 4:22 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all
deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more?
I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects
which I really do not ne
Stephan Witt wrote:
> In case it is of interest...
>
> These files (as of 12.07.2010,13:17) are ok on mac too.
> Built successfully with autotools.
Thanks.
Jürgen
Am 12.07.2010 um 13:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>> Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
>>>
>>>
>>>ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
>>> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/ly
Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Very nice!
>>
>> Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still
>> stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it.
>
> Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE.
Wouldn't it be better
On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Very nice!
Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still
stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it.
Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE.
> I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependenc
> With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just
clicking lyx.exe,
> without the need for a launcher or any registry keys or environment variables.
Very nice!
Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation
option and
Verburg wrote:
> On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.
>
> I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010:
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contri
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
> > >
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/l
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
>
> The file src/support/numpunct
ardcoded-dllimport-in-definition
> >
> > We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch,
> > so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
>
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/l
branch,
> so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.
OK, thanks.
Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
Jürgen
On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.
I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010:
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/
This in
Am 11.07.2010 16:47, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
I do not think, though, that the binaries that do not use cmake (i.e., yours,
Enrico's and Bennett's) need to be rebuilt.
Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.
regards Uwe
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:40:04 +0200
> Von: "Jürgen Spitzmüller"
> An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> CC: Joost Verburg
> Betreff: Re: LyX 1.6.7
> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > The problems also exist in SCons. It's abo
Joost Verburg wrote:
> The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC
> 2010 doesn't work.
I see. I suppose Uwe used another version then.
> All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC
> 2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball a
On 7/11/2010 11:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball?
No, there's still another compile error. See my previous message.
Joost
On 7/11/2010 10:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out
(waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release
1.6.7 after these problems are solved.
The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler
Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits?
>
> Yes.
So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball?
Jürgen
On 7/11/2010 5:08 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits?
Yes.
Joost
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I've uploaded my installer:
> https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id
> =17719
Thanks, I grabbed them.
> Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org?
I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out
(waiting for Joost's
> We can go on ...
I've uploaded my installer:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=17719
Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org?
thanks and regards
Uwe
Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> > Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
> > There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts
> > with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
> > not test it. Does it work?
>
> The tr1
BH wrote:
> Seems to work fine on Mac. I've put the binary here:
>
> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.7-Mac-Universal.dmg
Thanks, I downloaded it.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller lyx.org> writes:
>
> I've uploaded the tarballs to
>
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
>
> Please check and report back.
Compiles and
On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with
boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
not test it. Does it work?
The tr1 errors are fixed now when using CMake.
Original-Nachricht
> On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I've uploaded the tarballs to
> >
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I've uploaded the tarballs to
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
Please check and report back.
I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
I'
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> > I've uploaded the tarballs to
>> >
>> >
>> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
>> &g
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> We can go on ...
Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this
time ...) so far.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I've uploaded the tarballs to
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
> >
> >
&g
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I've uploaded the tarballs to
>
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
>
> Please check and report back.
>
> I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
I've uploaded the tarballs to
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
Please check and report back.
I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
Jürgen
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:23:08PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2010/6/28 Enrico Forestieri :
> > What about the attached fix for the IEEEtran.lyx document template?
>
> Yes, this should go in. I forgot about this.
Committed.
--
Enrico
On 6/28/2010 2:00 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
#6647Lyx does not pin correctly to the Windows 7 taskbar
(AFAIU Joost is working on this -- status?)
Yes, I'm working on this for 2.0. LyX will be compiled as a real GUI app
without a separate launcher. I don't think backporting to branch is
2010/6/28 Enrico Forestieri :
> What about the attached fix for the IEEEtran.lyx document template?
Yes, this should go in. I forgot about this.
Jürgen
> Enrico
>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:00:43AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Please let me know if there are any issues you would like to sort out
> for this release.
What about the attached fix for the IEEEtran.lyx document template?
--
Enrico
Index: lib/templates/IEEEtran.lyx
===
Following a suggestion by Pavel, I'd like to release LyX 1.6.7 soon,
since all stability issues with Qt 4.6 seem to be sorted out now, so
that distributors can ship a version of LyX that runs smoothly with
latest Qt.
I'm thinking about a release in ~2 weeks (around July 12). To this
end
77 matches
Mail list logo
