Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:53 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I think >> it is fine as it is. Currently ac2.13 + am 1.5 works with cxx. When >> we switch to autoconf 2.

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:53 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it is fine as it is. Currently ac2.13 + am 1.5 works with cxx. > When we switch to autoconf 2.5x, you will be able to use ac2.53 + > am1.6 and all should still work

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I've just checked that autoconf 2.13 works with my configure >> script. All is fine and dandy here too. deccxx and deccc are NOT >> needed at all when using automake >= 1.5. Excellent. Angus> I forgot to mention: Angus> The AC_LANG(

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 04 April 2002 12:32 pm, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Tuesday 02 April 2002 4:35 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Angus> Jean-Marc, I can confirm that I need neither CPP nor CPPFLAGS > > Angus> when configuring with auto

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 4:35 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Jean-Marc, I can confirm that I need neither CPP nor CPPFLAGS > Angus> when configuring with autoconf 2.52. All is fine and dandy. > > Great. > > >> Tell me (again?

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:30:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > What I don't get is why formala.C is #including locale info anyway. > Not to worry, I'm not going to waste much time on this. Everything std:string related carries around locale baggage. I've just removed two unneeded #include's fr

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-03 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 10:19 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: [...] > > >> static bool build_name (string&,const vector > >> > >> >&); --^ cxx: Error: > >> > >> /

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: [...] >> static bool build_name (string&,const vector >> >&); --^ cxx: Error: >> /usr/include/cxx/locimpl, line 309: #266 "string" is ambiguous >> >> etc. >> >> Any ide

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:55:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > So the question is why? Does `cc -E` provide any insights? > In particular, why isn't the "#define __STRING__" sufficient to stop > being loaded by some other header? Dumb STL implementation? Why should it? Where is written that '#d

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-03 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Wednesday 03 April 2002 9:55 am, Allan Rae wrote: ... > > In particular, why isn't the "#define __STRING__" sufficient to stop > > being loaded by some other header? Dumb STL implementation? > > Possibly. It appears that here it's called __STD_STRIN

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-03 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 9:55 am, Allan Rae wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: > [...] > > > static bool build_name (string&,const vector > > >&); --^ > > cxx: Error: /usr/include/cxx/locimpl, line 309: #266 "string" is > > ambiguous > > > > etc. > > > >

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-03 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote: [...] > static bool build_name (string&,const vector >&); > --^ > cxx: Error: /usr/include/cxx/locimpl, line 309: #266 "string" is ambiguous > > etc. > > Any ideas? I suppose your compiler is seeing a choice of std::string and lyx

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | static bool parse_name (vector >&,const char*); | -^ | cxx: Error: /usr/include/cxx/locimpl, line 309: #266 "string" is ambiguous | static bool build_name (string&,const vector >&); | --^ | cx

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 4:35 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Jean-Marc, I can confirm that I need neither CPP nor CPPFLAGS > Angus> when configuring with autoconf 2.52. All is fine and dandy. > > Great. Incidentally, when ru

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc, I can confirm that I need neither CPP nor CPPFLAGS Angus> when configuring with autoconf 2.52. All is fine and dandy. Great. >> Tell me (again?) what the problem was with autoconf 2.13. Angus> I'm willing to test auto

Re: INSTALL question

2002-04-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 28 March 2002 2:48 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> I think that compiling on Tru64 is now sufficiently > Angus> straightforward that users should be able to do it with the > Angus> help of a Readme only. Nonetheles

Re: INSTALL question

2002-03-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I believe that we check only for the existence of std::count, Angus> not whether it returns a sane value. >> Indeed. That's just stupid. Angus> It's stupid to check for a sane value? Fair enough; then the Angus> comment should st

Re: INSTALL question

2002-03-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 28 March 2002 3:11 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Why do you need to set CPP? [snip...] as I said, I'll check. > >> Is the problem with std::count still relevant now that we have > >> lyx::count? > > Angus> I believe that we check only for the existence of std::count, > Angus>

Re: INSTALL question

2002-03-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Thursday 28 March 2002 2:48 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Angus> I think that compiling on Tru64 is now sufficiently Angus> straightforward that users should be

Re: INSTALL question

2002-03-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 28 March 2002 2:48 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> I think that compiling on Tru64 is now sufficiently > Angus> straightforward that users should be able to do it with the > Angus> help of a Readme only. Nonetheles

Re: INSTALL question

2002-03-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I think that compiling on Tru64 is now sufficiently Angus> straightforward that users should be able to do it with the Angus> help of a Readme only. Nonetheless, it's still sufficiently Angus> convoluted that this info is probably

Re: INSTALL question

2002-03-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> o On Tru64 Unix with cxx, you may have a compilation error in Angus> lyx_main.C if you have GNU gettext installed. This is due to a Angus> bug in gettext. To solve this, you can either (1) configure Angus> with --with-included-ge

INSTALL question

2002-03-26 Thread Angus Leeming
o On Tru64 Unix with cxx, you may have a compilation error in lyx_main.C if you have GNU gettext installed. This is due to a bug in gettext. To solve this, you can either (1) configure with --with-included-gettext or (2) add -D__STDC__ to cxx flags. Jean-Marc, is there any differenc