>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I believe that we check only for the existence of std::count, Angus> not whether it returns a sane value. >> Indeed. That's just stupid. Angus> It's stupid to check for a sane value? Fair enough; then the Angus> comment should stay. No, I was actually agreeing with you. If it were just me, we'd just always use our own code instead of std::count. Of course, if this prolbem is fixed in cxx 6.2 (I think it is) or cxx 6.3, then there are less reasons for installing a workaround. Angus> I have no idea if I could still configure with 2.13; probably Angus> yes. I'm not particularly keen to investigate! I think it would work. It did work for me. JMarc
