Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:
> Beat me - I do not recall how and why it got there but killing it
> solved my problem: see snapshot.
> Is this line of any use ever or may I scrap it for good?
I think you can safely remove it since you already add this header to
t
On 10/26/2016 09:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 08:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:
Dear developers,
I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
Other document classes (I checked Komascript
On 10/26/2016 09:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 08:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:
Dear developers,
I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
Other document classes (I checked Komascript
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 08:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:
> Dear developers,
> I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
> behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
> Other document classes (I checked Komascript Article and Article
> Standard) show a simila
Dear developers,
I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
Other document classes (I checked Komascript Article and Article
Standard) show a similar behavior. That makes me believe it is a LyX
2.2.2 , 2.2.x etc. is
