Dear developers,
I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
Other document classes (I checked Komascript Article and Article
Standard) show a similar behavior. That makes me believe it is a LyX
2.2.2 , 2.2.x etc. issue.
Can you help, please?
Michael
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Nomenclature in TOC different/unexpected in LyX2.1/CLT4.1 vs
Lyx2,2.2/CLT4.2
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:03:00 +0200
From: Michael Berger <id...@online.de>
To: lyx-users <lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org>
Dear List,
The screenshot shows my code in Lyx 2.1/Classicthesis4.1; in the table
of contents it produces exactly what is desired:
Nomenclature and Glossary 142
The same codeentered in Lyx 2.2.2/Classicthesis4.2(biblatex_biber)
produces in the table of content:
Nomenclature and Glossary 37
Nomenclature and Glossary 39 (the document is double-sided)
Here, if I replace 'Nomenclature and Glossary' by 'Nomenclature' in the
second code line I get:
Nomenclature 37
Nomenclature and Glossary 39
Page 37 has some text from the preceding section but absolutely nothing
else. Page 38 is the back of page 37 and hence is completely empty. So,
it looks as if the word 'Nomenclature' is just showing in the TOC
without effecting the rest of the PDf document in .
Needless to say that I have been playing around a lot but could not get
rid of that "undesired" and IMHO useless extra TOC entry.
Any comment? Is this a Lyx issue?
Thanks and cheers,
Michael
