On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:45:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The original idea was that the code in dispatch
> if (!res.empty())
> owner->message(_(res));
> owner->updateMenubar();
> owner->updateToolbar();
> should be removed and go to verboseDispatch(
> I think we're talking past each other.
Yes :)
> I am not proposing to remove this difference anywhere.
>
> Find a spot where :
>
> verboseDispatch(..., false);
>
> cannot be transformed into
>
> dispatch(...)
>
> instead. I am proposing this change, then make verboseDispatch a
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:31:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hmm, I am not sure we understand each other, and maybe is there
> something I do not get. Anyway:
I think we're talking past each other.
> If you do M-c e in a buffer, you get something like
> Font: EMphasis On, Paragraph
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Read the 3rd verboseDispatch(). As I said, if it's false, all it
John> does is add a ' '.
John> I see if you call the void LyXFunc::verboseDispatch(string const
John> & s, bool show_sc) with show_sc == false, /there/ is the
John> diffe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:56:59AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Why should we display the Layout we have that information already.
Yes.
> But the more I follow this discussion the more it seems Jean-Marc is
> right with his "configurable" message-bar.
Possibly, but we still have to have a nic
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:25:31AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> o what use is show_sc param to verboseDispatch() ? If it is
> John> false, all it will do is add a ' ', iff there is no dispatch
> John> result message. Can I remove it ?
>
> when it is true, the keyboard shortcut for
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> No, it should say 'Layout: Title', and if there is some font change in the
> titel it should say 'Layout: Titel, Font: Emph' or similar. Also note
> that mathed does that already, at least for font changes and "major insets"
Why should we display the Layout we have that i
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:44:56PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Interesting idea, however I think a more useful step for the moment
> would be to ensure that the font info we show is the difference from
> the default font for that layout; e.g. if I am in a Title and I
> haven't changed any of the cha
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> Interesting idea, however I think a more useful step for the
Allan> moment would be to ensure that the font info we show is the
Allan> difference from the default font for that layout; e.g. if I am
Allan> in a Title and I haven't chang
On 17 Jul 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> John> o we show "at rest" something like "LyX: newfile.lyx (changed)"
> John> which duplicates the titlebar. I'd much prefer the "at rest"
> John> display to be the font mode status etc, e
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:34:51AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> One solution I had in mind is to have two virtual areas in minibuffer
> the left one for messages and the right one for shortcuts. The
> frontend would be responsible for deciding how to display that. The
> advantage is that i
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:01:19AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> ... but this sounds like a worthy goal. So I would not mind
>> removing the message, but wait for other opinions.
John> Sure. I'm finding various bits of the minibuffer
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:15:21AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> Sure. I'm finding various bits of the minibuffer state display
>> rather confusing and awkward actually. Some random things :
John> o what use is show_sc param to verboseDi
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:22:11AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:15:21AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Sure. I'm finding various bits of the minibuffer state display rather
> > confusing and awkward actually. Some random things :
>
> o what use is show_sc param to verboseDi
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:15:21AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Sure. I'm finding various bits of the minibuffer state display rather
> confusing and awkward actually. Some random things :
o what use is show_sc param to verboseDispatch() ? If it is false, all
it will do is add a ' ', iff there i
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:15:21AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Sure. I'm finding various bits of the minibuffer state display rather
> confusing and awkward actually. Some random things :
>
> o why is commandshortcut a member of lyxfunc rather than an auto ?
> o the string return from ::dispatch s
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:01:19AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> ... but this sounds like a worthy goal. So I would not mind removing the
> message, but wait for other opinions.
Sure. I'm finding various bits of the minibuffer state display rather
confusing and awkward actually. Some random thin
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:55:57AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Is font loading really a significant part of a document load time ?
I believe so...
> If we could remove this message, we can kill a current_view use and
> remove messagePush/Pop as well
... but this sounds like a worthy goal. So I w
Is font loading really a significant part of a document load time ?
If we could remove this message, we can kill a current_view use and
remove messagePush/Pop as well
thanks
john
--
"i am sorey I cant reads yuor emale because my emale box has filtar on it
whitch says, "NO EMALES FROM PEOAPAL
19 matches
Mail list logo
