On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:36:42PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > +-++
> > some text |LABEL|text| more text
> > +-++
> > same way current collapsible inset is drawn
> > +-+
> > |LABEL|
> > ++
> > |text... |
> > |text... |
> > +-
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:43:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> But this does not save any code than, so it's just a UI thing?
>
> You know, some people are interested in other things than saving
> code...
Really?
There must be funny people out there...
Andre'
--
Those who des
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> But this does not save any code than, so it's just a UI thing?
You know, some people are interested in other things than saving
code...
JMarc
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:29:32PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> We can make the other collapsible inset behave in the same way (see below).
> A perhaps better behavior of collapsible inset is as follows:
> An open collapsible inset is drawn inline as follows:
> +-++
> some text |L
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:16:34PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 12 August 2002 2:29 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > No, I meant Inline and Collapsed.
> >
> > > I occasionally have an ERT inset containing several lines of LaTeX. I'm
> > > sure Herbert has too...
> >
> > You can have more than
On Monday 12 August 2002 2:29 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> No, I meant Inline and Collapsed.
>
> > I occasionally have an ERT inset containing several lines of LaTeX. I'm
> > sure Herbert has too...
>
> You can have more than one line of text in an inline ERT inset.
> In that case, it behaves exactly a
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:07:40PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> This doesn't contradict what I've written above.
Ah. Ok.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 12 August 2002 2:07 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > > Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (
On Monday 12 August 2002 2:07 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ?
> > > In my opinion, the open state has
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ?
> > In my opinion, the open state has no advantage over the inline state.
> > So in my opinion, we
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:45:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ?
> In my opinion, the open state has no advantage over the inline state.
> So in my opinion, we can just have inline & collapsed states.
> Then, the ERT dialog can be
Why do we need 3 states for ERT insets (open, collapsed, and inline) ?
In my opinion, the open state has no advantage over the inline state.
So in my opinion, we can just have inline & collapsed states.
Then, the ERT dialog can be removed (pressing the 2nd mouse button in an
inline inset will coll
12 matches
Mail list logo
