Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/12/15 18:33, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Note that for selecting symbols, we should check in what unicode version they were introduced. The failing symbols were version 6 (negative cross) and 3 (reversed pilcrow). The new symbols are all at most unicode 1.1. I am not sure that we can make a

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-04 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 04/12/2015 13:19, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 04/12/2015 13:46, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Please use the same cross that is used for the branch inset. It looks like a good idea to have the same symbol in both places. Good idea. I did not realise (although I knew...) that ✖ was already

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/12/2015 13:46, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Please use the same cross that is used for the branch inset. It looks like a good idea to have the same symbol in both places. Good idea. I did not realise (although I knew...) that ✖ was already used for branches. Here's a patch (more details in t

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-04 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 02/12/2015 22:19, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Le 02/12/2015 20:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 02/12/2015 19:44, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I just tested alpha 2.2 on Windows 10. I can reproduce the white square issue even there. In fact it is worse than that: other symbols such as ✍ also

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 02/12/2015 22:19, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Again, let's hope that qt 5.6 will do miracles. If there is a prerelease packaged, it would be a good idea to try it now on Windows. It seems overly optimistic to think that we'll just try it out at release time. Now that we know that there was

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 02/12/2015 20:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 02/12/2015 19:44, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I just tested alpha 2.2 on Windows 10. I can reproduce the white square issue even there. In fact it is worse than that: other symbols such as ✍ also display as a square (also ✀ I assume), and even

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 02/12/2015 19:45, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : Instead of the pilcrow I get a thick vertical line (like a sans serif I in bold). Mystery solved. Instead of ¶, the source used the character ⁋, which obviously is less common. Thank you for your tests.

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 3/12/2015 8:45 a.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 3/12/2015 8:00 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 02/12/2015 18:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote: * Have you ever noticed other symbols displaying incorrectly? For instance, does the outliner correctl

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/12/2015 19:44, Guillaume Munch a écrit : I just tested alpha 2.2 on Windows 10. I can reproduce the white square issue even there. In fact it is worse than that: other symbols such as ✍ also display as a square (also ✀ I assume), and even the ¶ symbol, used in the outliner for tracked chang

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 3/12/2015 8:00 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 02/12/2015 18:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote: * Have you ever noticed other symbols displaying incorrectly? For instance, does the outliner correctly displays the symbols ✀ and ✍ for tracked change

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 02/12/2015 18:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 01/12/2015 21:57, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline display shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached png. Activate the bran

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 02/12/2015 17:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 02/12/2015 17:37, Guillaume Munch a écrit : First, this is indeed the symbol ❎ not displaying correctly but this has nothing to do with a missing font package in your latex distribution. This symbol does not display correctly on my oldish

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 3/12/2015 5:37 a.m., Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 01/12/2015 21:57, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline display shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached png. Activate the branch and the duplication vanishes. I read in the

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/12/2015 17:37, Guillaume Munch a écrit : First, this is indeed the symbol ❎ not displaying correctly but this has nothing to do with a missing font package in your latex distribution. This symbol does not display correctly on my oldish Ubuntu 12.04 install. JMarc

Re: Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-02 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 01/12/2015 21:57, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline display shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached png. Activate the branch and the duplication vanishes. I read in the New features in 2.2 that " entries that are disabl

Duplication in Outline display with inactive branches

2015-12-01 Thread Andrew Parsloe
When a branch is inactivated in alpha2 (on Windows), the Outline display shows duplicated expand/contract boxes, as in the attached png. Activate the branch and the duplication vanishes. I read in the New features in 2.2 that " entries that are disabled (i.e. either in a note or in an inactive