lOn Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:28:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | And the explanation (if I'm not mistaken) is as follows:
> | The \begin{figure} causes TeX to go into restricted vertical mode, so
> | the space after \begin{figure} is ignored.
> | The space after the 'x' appears right befo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>There is no difference between the two!
>>>
> | And the explanation (if I'm not mistaken) is as follows:
> | The \begin{figure} causes TeX to go into restricted vertical mode, so
> | the space after \begin{figure} is ignored.
> | The space after the 'x' appears right
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:43:19PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> > The version with the '%'s is read by latex as:
>> >
>> > "Hello.
>> > \begin{figure}x\end{figure}
>> > Bar."
>> >
>>
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:43:19PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > The version with the '%'s is read by latex as:
> >
> > "Hello.
> > \begin{figure}x\end{figure}
> > Bar."
> >
> > and the other is read as
> >
> > "Hello.
> > \
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is where you are wrong...
>
> The version with the '%'s is read by latex as:
>
> "Hello.
> \begin{figure}x\end{figure}
> Bar."
>
> and the other is read as
>
> "Hello.
> \begin{figure}
> x
> \end{figure}
> Bar."
>
>
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:32:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > No, the 1.2.0 behavior is wrong! Note that text in my example is
> > "Hello. Hello." namely there is a space before the second 'H'.
> > In the 1.2.0 output, there is no space between the sentences.
> >
> > The only pla
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Does endfloat like this:
>>
>> Hello.
>> \begin{figure}%
>> x%
>> \end{figure}
>> Bar.
>
| Yes, but both % chars has no effect, so we can just write
| Hello.
| \begin{figure}
| x
| \
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Does endfloat like this:
>
> Hello.
> \begin{figure}%
> x%
> \end{figure}
> Bar.
Yes, but both % chars has no effect, so we can just write
Hello.
\begin{figure}
x
\end{figure}
Bar.
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Suppose that I have a paragraph that contains the string "Foo.", a float,
| and then string " Bar." The figure contains a single letter.
>
| The 1.1.6 output is
| Hello.
| \begin{figure}
| x
| \end{figure}
| Bar.
>
| The 1.2.0 output is
| Hello.\begin{fi
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>>Yes, but this is a case where 1.1.6 had a broken behaviour. Figure
>>floats should not output anything at the point where they are
>>inserted. Keeping output identical to 1.1.6 is not som holy grail.
>
>
> No, the 1.2.0 behavior is wrong! Note that text in my example is
> "He
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Suppose that I have a paragraph that contains the string "Foo.", a float,
> and then string " Bar." The figure contains a single letter.
>
> The 1.1.6 output is
> Hello.
> \begin{figure}
> x
> \end{figure}
> Bar.
>
> The 1.2.0 output is
> Hello.\begin{figu
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:20:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > The 1.2.0 format is bad bacuase:
> > 1) It is not compatible with endfloat.sty
>
> Indeed.
>
> > 2) It is ugly when read by a human.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > 3) The DVI output is different than in 1.1.6:
> >
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The 1.2.0 format is bad bacuase:
> 1) It is not compatible with endfloat.sty
Indeed.
> 2) It is ugly when read by a human.
Indeed.
> 3) The DVI output is different than in 1.1.6:
> In 1.1.6 the result is 'Hello. Hello.', while in 1.2.0 the result is
> 'Hello.Hello'.
> Once
Suppose that I have a paragraph that contains the string "Foo.", a float,
and then string " Bar." The figure contains a single letter.
The 1.1.6 output is
Hello.
\begin{figure}
x
\end{figure}
Bar.
The 1.2.0 output is
Hello.\begin{figure}%
x\end{figure}%
Bar.
The 1.2.0 format is bad bacuase:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:27:47PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> please apply together with small changes to insetgraphics.
> [...]
> if (!opts.empty() && !message.empty())
> - before += ("[" + opts + ',' + message);
> + before += ("[%\n" + opts + ',' + message);
In
Looking at the export from 1.16 fix 4, and 1.2.0pre4 (without the patch),
I see the following from 1.1.6
%% LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
\begin{document}
This is a test with a float.
\begin{figure}
{\centering \includegraphics{graphs/overall-spring/spring-
Rod Pinna wrote:
> Herbert et al,
>
> Just checked the patch. For endfloat to work, it needs the following
>
> os << "\n\\end{" << tmptype << "}\n";
>
> rather than
>
> os << "\\end{" << tmptype << "}%\n";
>
> which was the original line.
>
> i.e. end{float}\n, rather than end{float}%
yes
Herbert et al,
Just checked the patch. For endfloat to work, it needs the following
os << "\n\\end{" << tmptype << "}\n";
rather than
os << "\\end{" << tmptype << "}%\n";
which was the original line.
i.e. end{float}\n, rather than end{float}%
No other change appear necessary. I also check u
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | we have an environment:
>
> | \begin{...} ... any stuff \end{...}
>
> | or
>
> | \begin{...}
> | ... any stuff
> | \end{...}
>
> Yes.
> And your point is?
I prefer the last one.
as a "inlined" one:
...text...%
\begin{...}
any stuff
\end[...}%
...text .
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 11:21:02PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >>
> >> would endfloat work with:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> \include{}%
> >> \end{float}
> >
> | Yes.
> | But what
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>> wrote:
>>
would endfloat work with:
...
\include{}%
\end{float}
>> | Yes.
>> | But what
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>>would endfloat work with:
>>>
>>>...
>>>\include{}%
>>>\end{float}
>>>
> | Yes.
> | But what is the purpose of the % char ?
> | In
> | \include{}
>
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> would endfloat work with:
>>
>> ...
>> \include{}%
>> \end{float}
>
| Yes.
| But what is the purpose of the % char ?
| In
| \include{}
| \end{float}
>
| , I think that the space b
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> would endfloat work with:
>
> ...
> \include{}%
> \end{float}
Yes.
But what is the purpose of the % char ?
In
\include{}
\end{float}
, I think that the space between \include{} and \end{float} (i.e. the \n char)
has no af
Just for information, here are some cut down bits. The first is exported
from lyx-1.2.0-pre4, and doesn't work, the working one is below.
--
restraint is increased and
secondly, the deformation zone moves away from the restrained end.\begin{figure}%
\inclu
Lars,
Just checked.
Endfloat works with
text text text.\begin{figure}%
\includegraphics[ ]{}
\includegraphics[]{}
\caption{}
\end{figure}
The only thing I changed from the tex exported from lyx was
\caption{}\end{figure}%
Rod
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Rod Pinna wrote:
>>
Hi all,
This is *possibly* an endfloat bug, but it seems to be caused by a
change
in the sytax outputted by 1.2.0
For floats, the new fo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Rod Pinna wrote:
>
>>>Hi all,
>>>This is *possibly* an endfloat bug, but it seems to be caused by a
>>>change
>>>in the sytax outputted by 1.2.0
>>>For floats, the new format is text text text \begin{figure}%
>>>\includ
Lars,
> I am not convinced that this is what we want.
> Have we sent a buf repor to the endfloat maintainer?
> should we have a '%' at the '\include{}'?
> Does this happen with even the recent versions of endfloat?
Just downloaded endfloat from CTAN, and the current version documentation
is date
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Rod Pinna wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> This is *possibly* an endfloat bug, but it seems to be caused by a
>> change
>> in the sytax outputted by 1.2.0
>> For floats, the new format is text text text \begin{figure}%
>> \include{}\end{figure}%
>> Endfloat demand
Rod Pinna wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is *possibly* an endfloat bug, but it seems to be caused by a change
> in the sytax outputted by 1.2.0
>
> For floats, the new format is
>
> text text text \begin{figure}%
> \include{}\end{figure}%
>
> Endfloat demands
> text text text \begin{figure}%
> \
Hi all,
This is *possibly* an endfloat bug, but it seems to be caused by a change
in the sytax outputted by 1.2.0
For floats, the new format is
text text text \begin{figure}%
\include{}\end{figure}%
Endfloat demands
text text text \begin{figure}%
\include{}
\end{figure}%
This is text in the
32 matches
Mail list logo
