On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:51:07PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Qt3/Win uses the native API.
>
> LyX 1.5 was basically performing the same with both Qt3/Win and Qt4/Win.
So this indicates a change in lyx rathr than Qt.
Andre
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:59:06PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > LyX 1.5 was basically performing the same with both Qt3/Win and Qt4/Win.
> > So, from what you say, its poor performance is related to something that
> > is being done differently with respect to 1.3.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
LyX 1.5 was basically performing the same with both Qt3/Win and Qt4/Win.
So, from what you say, its poor performance is related to something that
is being done differently with respect to 1.3. Indeed, even using Qt/X11,
scrolling of the document attached to bug 2900 is di
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:01:06PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:21:41PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:01:06PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:21:41PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > >>> I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
> > >
>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Enrico> I have always stated that LyX/Qt/X11 is more snappy than
> Enrico> LyX/Qt/Win. But this is true for 1.4, as LyX 1.3, using the
> Enrico> same Qt/Win ver
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> I would more correctly say that it is a problem with the Qt
Enrico> library implemented directly using the Windows API, as the Qt
Enrico> library which goes through the X11 API does not have this
Enrico> problem, even if it ru
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:21:41PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>> I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
> >
> >Abdelrazak> LyX-1.4/qt3 behaves exactly the same with this file.
> >
> >So th
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:05:03AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> I doubt it. LyX/Qt3/X11 on Windows (Cygwin, really) performs
> Enrico> exactly the same as on *nix, so this is something specifically
> Enrico> relate
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
Abdelrazak> LyX-1.4/qt3 behaves exactly the same with this file.
So this is a general problem with lyx-qt on windows, right?
I would rather say with lyx-mathed
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
Abdelrazak> LyX-1.4/qt3 behaves exactly the same with this file.
So this is a general problem with lyx-qt on windows, right?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> I doubt it. LyX/Qt3/X11 on Windows (Cygwin, really) performs
Enrico> exactly the same as on *nix, so this is something specifically
Enrico> related to Qt3/Win.
Enrico> Yes, that file is still impossib
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> I doubt it. LyX/Qt3/X11 on Windows (Cygwin, really) performs
Enrico> exactly the same as on *nix, so this is something specifically
Enrico> related to Qt3/Win.
Enrico> Yes, that file is still impossible to manage in LyX/Qt3/W
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:48:09AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
> Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank you very much.
>
> Did you look at t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank yo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank you very much.
Did you look at the file in bug 2900? This is a slowdown with math
insets
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank you very much.
Did you look at the file in bug 2900? This is a slowdown with math
insets that is peculiar to windo
Hello,
As to experiment wether LyX is really that slow or not, I've made a
little experiment:
1) Open the UserGuide in 5 different windows (choose "Switch to
document" in order to have synchronized view of the same document.
2) type as fast as you can.
There's an almost imperceptible delay
19 matches
Mail list logo
