> Next, there seems to be some strangeness is the expand/hide behaviour of
> footnotes. I find that when I click on a hidden footnote 'button', I
> often get an expansion of the text selection happening, rather than the
> intended result of the footnote becoming visible.
is this the bug http://bug
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:12:31PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
>> John Pye wrote:
>>
>>> Firstly, the 'compressed' feature for LyX documents seems like a problem
>>> when using LyX files in a CVS/SVN repository, because one can easily
>>> change a file's type from binary t
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:12:31PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> John Pye wrote:
>> Firstly, the 'compressed' feature for LyX documents seems like a problem
>> when using LyX files in a CVS/SVN repository, because one can easily
>> change a file's type from binary to text and back again. This causes
>> ha
John Pye wrote:
Firstly, the 'compressed' feature for LyX documents seems like a problem
when using LyX files in a CVS/SVN repository, because one can easily
change a file's type from binary to text and back again. This causes
havoc with tools that attempt to determine a file's text-or-binary
sta
Hi all
I have a few issues/bugs with LyX 1.5.3 that I'd like to comment on.
Firstly, the 'compressed' feature for LyX documents seems like a problem
when using LyX files in a CVS/SVN repository, because one can easily
change a file's type from binary to text and back again. This causes
havoc with
