instanton wrote:
> Sure. Attached is an example tex file using the class ctexart.
Thanks.
Jürgen
-devel,soft_share
Sent: 2008-06-10, 16:23:19
Subject: Re: [patch] support CJK font argument
instanton wrote:
> Nowadays there are a number of document classes supporting Chinese in
> LaTeX. Besides using the standard document classes like article, book,
> report etc with the aid o
instanton wrote:
> Nowadays there are a number of document classes supporting Chinese in
> LaTeX. Besides using the standard document classes like article, book,
> report etc with the aid of CJK, we sometimes also use documentclasses like
>
> cctart cctbook ctexart ctexbook ctexreport (for GBK enc
instanton wrote:
> \RequirePackage{CJK}
> \AtBeginDocument{\begin{CJK*}{GBK}{}\CJKtilde\CJKcaption{GB}}
> \AtEndDocument{\end{CJK*}}
>
> in the preamble, rather than having
>
> \begin{CJK*}{GBK}{}
>
> at the begining and
>
> \end{CJK*}
>
> in the ending.
In the cases I talk about, the
> First, I am sorry if my sentence above seemed a bit definitive to you.
> It was intended as a joke, and a way to concede Juergen's point about
> the need for variation...
Never mind. I just need to explain my stand point.
> However, I am not sure of one thing: do these different classe
> We also want to support users who want to cite CJK
> content in non-CJK documents (linguists come to mind).
In that case, I would suggest to implement adding
\RequirePackage{CJK}
\AtBeginDocument{\begin{CJK*}{GBK}{}\CJKtilde\CJKcaption{GB}}
\AtEndDocument{\end{CJK*}}
in the preamble, rat
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is not possible. We also want to support users who want to cite CJK
> content in non-CJK documents (linguists come to mind).
There is also the problem of knowing whether these CJK classes can
contain non-cjk contents.
JMarc
"instanton"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> JMark,
>
>> Who are you to decide that they appreciate variation? Let them choose
>> whether they do!
Hello,
First, I am sorry if my sentence above seemed a bit definitive to you.
It was intended as a joke, and a way to concede Juergen's point about
th
instanton wrote:
> These extra document classes depends on CJK implicitly which means that
> one needs not add \usepackage{CJK} in the preamble and also needs not to
> put \begin{CJK}{GBK}{} after \begin{document} and \end{CJK} before
> \end{document}. These document classes are much more popular
JMark,
> Who are you to decide that they appreciate variation? Let them choose
> whether they do!
As I am Chinese and also am the maintainer of a special MiKTeX bundle called
MiCTeX for Chinese users (which takes special care of all relevant packages
which LyX might need to run), I might
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I think the text field is OK as a first step, unless some more
> CJK-experienced developper improves the UI comfort.
OK.
> Furthermore I suppose that CJK users also appreciate some typographic
> variation.
Who are you to decide that they ap
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Isn't it possible (desirable) to have a list of fonts instead of a
> text field?
I thought about this, but then I'm not sure about the concrete list of fonts,
and also how we could check for their availability (if we use a combo, we
would be desirable indeed, we sho
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch lets the user customize the font argument in the CJK
> command
>
> \begin{CJK}{}{}
>
> globally on a per-document basis (in Document->Settings->Fonts).
Isn't it possible (desirable) to have a list of fonts instead of a
tex
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 09:23:06 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Since this is a file format change and we're in a freeze (?), I'm awaiting
> José's decision.
As soon as I get feedback from beta 3 the freeze is over and you can commit
this.
This does not exclude other comments to this patch natura
The attached patch lets the user customize the font argument in the CJK
command
\begin{CJK}{}{}
globally on a per-document basis (in Document->Settings->Fonts).
Currently, this argument is always empty, which means that CJK falls back to
the default font (song). This apparently does no
15 matches
Mail list logo
