instanton wrote:
> These extra document classes depends on CJK implicitly which means that
> one needs not add \usepackage{CJK} in the preamble and also needs not to
> put \begin{CJK}{GBK}{} after \begin{document} and \end{CJK} before
> \end{document}. These document classes are much more popular among Chinese
> users than using the standard documentclasses with the aid of CJK, because
> better sectioning and numbering systems are implemented in the cct and
> ctex series of classes.
OK, then we should implement
Provides CJK
in the layout file.
Please file a bug report for this.
> Therefore, I strongly suggest that LyX should remove all the hard codes
> which explicitly refers to the use of CJK packages and only takes care
> that the correct Chinese characters can be imported/exported with
> appropriate encodings. If this to be the case we can make our own .layout
> files to make use of any of the above-mentioned cct or ctex series of
> classes.
This is not possible. We also want to support users who want to cite CJK
content in non-CJK documents (linguists come to mind).
Jürgen
