Also sprach Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> I like it, except that intitle should be initialized when it is
> declared. I guess the compiler warns about it.
Yes, my fault. I have now initialized it (to "false"). Just committing.
> Feel free to apply it, as far as 1.3.x is concerned. I would say that
> it
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> FWIW, I agree that Juergen's patch is the way to go. Actually, if
>> we had a scripting language in layout files, or if we used css for
>> them, we could encode this directly in the layout.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> FWIW, I agree that Juergen's patch is the way to go. Actually, if we
> had a scripting language in layout files, or if we used css for them,
> we could encode this directly in the layout.
BTW, I also have a patch for 1.3.x (attached). Slightly different approach,
but
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> I am not sure. Having two insets (or at least a parameter 'thanks'
>> or 'footnote' to the existing footnote inset makes mark up more
>> 'high level'. In fact, I think your patch is the LaTeX centr
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I am not sure. Having two insets (or at least a parameter 'thanks' or
> 'footnote' to the existing footnote inset makes mark up more 'high
> level'. In fact, I think your patch is the LaTeX centric solution (Don't
> get me wrong, your solution it is fine with me, but not with
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 01:37:50PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > I wonder if we shouldn't make this a real InsetThanks then.
>
> I don't want to separate it on the ui-side (users should not bother whether to
> use \thanks or \footnote, since it is basically t
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 01:37:50PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > I wonder if we shouldn't make this a real InsetThanks then.
>
> I don't want to separate it on the ui-side (users should not bother whether to
> use \thanks or \footnote, since it is basically t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I wonder if we shouldn't make this a real InsetThanks then.
I don't want to separate it on the ui-side (users should not bother whether to
use \thanks or \footnote, since it is basically the same concept). Moreover,
this separation would be very LaTeX-centric, and I
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1677
>
| The command \thanks is a special kind of "footnote" for titling commands
| (\title, \author, \date). LyX always uses \footnote, though, which works well
| with most classes, since the standard cla
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1677
The command \thanks is a special kind of "footnote" for titling commands
(\title, \author, \date). LyX always uses \footnote, though, which works well
with most classes, since the standard classes (and lots of other) do a
\let\footnote\thanks
inside t
10 matches
Mail list logo
