>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Andre Poenitz wrote: >> I am not sure. Having two insets (or at least a parameter 'thanks' >> or 'footnote' to the existing footnote inset makes mark up more >> 'high level'. In fact, I think your patch is the LaTeX centric >> solution (Don't get me wrong, your solution it is fine with me, but >> not with your explanation). Juergen> Why? \thanks is a very LaTeX specific thing AFAIK, a LaTeX Juergen> specific subtype of a footnote. That's why my solution checks Juergen> at ::latex level if this subtype should be used. If docbook Juergen> had something like, say: <editorsnote>, a special footnote Juergen> type inside quotations, would you add another inset? I would Juergen> just check inside ::docbook if a footnote is inside a Juergen> quotation environment. But maybe I just don't understand that Juergen> whole XML/XSLT concept. FWIW, I agree that Juergen's patch is the way to go. Actually, if we had a scripting language in layout files, or if we used css for them, we could encode this directly in the layout. JMarc
