Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | H, I see it's gone in, but it looks to me like this patch has the
> | potential to break Cygwin and Windows builds.
>
> Sure... unfortunately it seems that the only way to get (cyg)Win
> people to comment on the patch is to check it in and wait for breakage
> rep
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | This patch kills all uses and replace it with calls to
>> | boost.filesystem (+ a couple of new functions).
>>>
>> | Everything seems to work just fine to me...
>>>
>> | So unless I get unfavourable comments this goes in t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | This patch kills all uses and replace it with calls to
> | boost.filesystem (+ a couple of new functions).
>>
> | Everything seems to work just fine to me...
>>
> | So unless I get unfavourable comments this goes in tomorrow evening.
>
> Updated it a bit.
>
> - got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Hmm... you are right... wronly will also return 1 .. and it should
| return -1
I rewrote all callers of IsFileWriteable and removed the function
completely.
Besides I found a place where it was used wrong as well...
--
Lgb
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:48:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> This patch kills all uses and replace it with calls to
>> boost.filesystem (+ a couple of new functions).
>
| int IsFileWriteable(string const & path)
| {
| - FileInfo fi(path
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:48:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> This patch kills all uses and replace it with calls to
> boost.filesystem (+ a couple of new functions).
int IsFileWriteable(string const & path)
{
- FileInfo fi(path);
-
- if (fi.access(FileInfo::wperm|FileInfo:
