On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:34:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Didn't you notice the hundred commits that got rid of QT3_SUPPORT?
>
> Sure did.
>
> But the argument put forward was that we don't have to do anything
> since QT3_SUPPORT is a supported part of Qt4.
The argument was: QT3_S
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > | >>> Conclusion: this is not a valid objection. Besides Peter is
| > | > | >>> committed to get rid of those compat methods.
| > | > | >> Then let's convince Lars t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | >>> Conclusion: this is not a valid objection. Besides Peter is
| > | >>> committed to get rid of those compat methods.
| > | >> Then let's convince Lars that this is not a showstopper :-)
| > | > Trolltech considers
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | >>> Conclusion: this is not a valid objection. Besides Peter is
| > | >>> committed to get rid of those compat methods.
| > | >> Then let's convince Lars that this is not a showstopper :-)
| > | > Trolltech considers the QT3 compat stuff as regul
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
| >> Abdel,
| >>
| I don't know the status regarding (1) - is there anything
| missing? Are there any changes to qt3 that ha
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
| >> Abdel,
| >>
| I don't know the status regarding (1) - is there anything
| missing? Are there any changes to qt3 that haven't been ported to
| q
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Survival of the fittest. And only the fittest...
Abdelrazak> That's qt4 for now :-)
You mean 'survival of the bulliest'? ;-)
JMarc
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdel,
I don't know the status regarding (1) - is there anything missing? Are
there any changes to qt3 that haven't been ported to qt4?
I think qt4 has now the same feature set as qt3 plus some more candy:
And
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:06AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Leuven, E. wrote:
5) Some new code needs to be ported from the qt3 frontend, look at
the svn log: 5-a) I remember the QNote thing from Martin, he even sent
a preliminar patch for qt4 but I did not have the
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Abdel,
>
> >>I don't know the status regarding (1) - is there anything missing? Are
> >>there any changes to qt3 that haven't been ported to qt4?
>
> >I think qt4 has now the same feature set as qt3 plus some more candy:
> >And qt4
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:06AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Leuven, E. wrote:
> >>> 5) Some new code needs to be ported from the qt3 frontend, look at
> >>>the svn log: 5-a) I remember the QNote thing from Martin, he even sent
> >>>a preliminar patch for qt4 but I did not have the time t
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:39:45AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:05:47AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> Michael Gerz wrote:
> >> > 5-b) I remember some work from Georg and Enrico about some math
> >> > symbols. I thing Georg
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
snapshot attached, and gonna commit unless people object
Go ahead.
it's in
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:05:47AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Michael Gerz wrote:
> 5-b) I remember some work from Georg and Enrico about some math
> symbols. I thing Georg put a FIXME in qt4 for that.
Done by Edwin IIRC.
Nope. The FIXME i
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:05:47AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Michael Gerz wrote:
> 5-b) I remember some work from Georg and Enrico about some math
> symbols. I thing Georg put a FIXME in qt4 for that.
Done by Edwin IIRC.
Nope. The FIXME is still there in QDel
Leuven, E. wrote:
5) Some new code needs to be ported from the qt3 frontend, look at
the svn log: 5-a) I remember the QNote thing from Martin, he even sent
a preliminar patch for qt4 but I did not have the time to look at it
yet.
Not sure this was done yet, Edwin, Martin?
not by me, but we
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:05:47AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Michael Gerz wrote:
> 5-b) I remember some work from Georg and Enrico about some math
> symbols. I thing Georg put a FIXME in qt4 for that.
Done by Edwin IIRC.
Nope. The FIXME is still there in QDel
Leuven, E. wrote:
5) Some new code needs to be ported from the qt3 frontend, look at
the svn log: 5-a) I remember the QNote thing from Martin, he even sent
a preliminar patch for qt4 but I did not have the time to look at it
yet.
Not sure this was done yet, Edwin, Martin?
not by me, but we
Leuven, E. wrote:
5) Some new code needs to be ported from the qt3 frontend, look at
the svn log: 5-a) I remember the QNote thing from Martin, he even sent
a preliminar patch for qt4 but I did not have the time to look at it
yet.
Not sure this was done yet, Edwin, Martin?
not by me, but we
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:05:47AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Michael Gerz wrote:
> > 5-b) I remember some work from Georg and Enrico about some math
> > symbols. I thing Georg put a FIXME in qt4 for that.
>
> Done by Edwin IIRC.
Nope. The FIXME is still there in QDelimiterDialog.C.
--
> >5) Some new code needs to be ported from the qt3 frontend, look at
> > the svn log: 5-a) I remember the QNote thing from Martin, he even sent
> > a preliminar patch for qt4 but I did not have the time to look at it
> > yet.
>
> Not sure this was done yet, Edwin, Martin?
not by me, but we sh
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdel,
I don't know the status regarding (1) - is there anything missing?
Are there any changes to qt3 that haven't been ported to qt4?
I think qt4 has now the same feature set as qt3 plus some more candy:
And qt4 has a much nicer code base now, most notably for:
How ab
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
This patch continue my tedious cleanup work. Basically it transfer
most of the LyXView use from BufferView to WorkArea, most notably:
LyXView::updateLayoutChoice();
LyXView::updateToolbars();
LyXView::getLyXFunc().processKeySym(key, st
Abdel,
I don't know the status regarding (1) - is there anything missing? Are
there any changes to qt3 that haven't been ported to qt4?
I think qt4 has now the same feature set as qt3 plus some more candy:
And qt4 has a much nicer code base now, most notably for:
How about http://www.mail-a
Well, I compiled qt4 by myself to make sure that there is really no need to
keep qt3 :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Georg Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Patch] Further BufferView <-> WorkArea reorganisat
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2006 21:03 schrieb Michael Gerz:
> mainly replacing qt3 function calls by qt4 function calls. BTW: Last
week, I
> compiled qt4 on my old SuSE 9.3 machine - absolutely problem-free!
No need to do that - the opensuse people provide qt4 rpms for 9.3, but they
are well hidde
Michael Gerz wrote:
Hi Abdel,
The same argument applies to qt3. Furthermore, qt4 is feature complete
now thanks to Edwin latest Bullet patch. So please, let's just drop it.
I think that Lars isn't fully against dropping qt3. In one of his recent
emails (about two weeks ago), he said that the
Hi Abdel,
The same argument applies to qt3. Furthermore, qt4 is feature complete
now thanks to Edwin latest Bullet patch. So please, let's just drop it.
I think that Lars isn't fully against dropping qt3. In one of his recent
emails (about two weeks ago), he said that there are mainly two thi
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
This patch continue my tedious cleanup work. Basically it transfer most
of the LyXView use from BufferView to WorkArea, most notably:
LyXView::updateLayoutChoice();
LyXView::updateToolbars();
LyXView::getLyXFunc().processKeySym(key, state);
LyXView::dispatch(cm
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I would like to commit it and wait for some kind soul to
Abdelrazak> verify that it also compile and work for qt3 and gtk.
gtk build:
- when resizing, the screen goes black. If I click somewhe
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I would like to commit it and wait for some kind soul to
Abdelrazak> verify that it also compile and work for qt3 and gtk.
gtk build:
- when resizing, the screen goes black. If I click somewhere, it is
repaint correct
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I would like to commit it and wait for some kind soul to
Abdelrazak> verify that it also compile and work for qt3 and gtk.
The code in frontends/gtk compiles.
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hello, This patch continue my tedious cleanup work.
Abdelrazak> Basically it transfer most of the LyXView use from
Abdelrazak> BufferView to WorkArea, most notably:
Abdelrazak> LyXView::updateLayoutChoice(); LyXView::
Hello,
This patch continue my tedious cleanup work. Basically it transfer most
of the LyXView use from BufferView to WorkArea, most notably:
LyXView::updateLayoutChoice();
LyXView::updateToolbars();
LyXView::getLyXFunc().processKeySym(key, state);
LyXView::dispatch(cmd);
This patch has been t
34 matches
Mail list logo
