Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | >>> Conclusion: this is not a valid objection. Besides Peter is | > | > | >>> committed to get rid of those compat methods. | > | > | >> Then let's convince Lars that this is not a showstopper :-) | > | > | > Trolltech considers the QT3 compat stuff as regular part of Qt4, i.e. | > | > | > pretty much the same way the <cxxxx> headers are part of C++. | > | > | | Conclusion: We are even ready for Qt5 now :-) | > | > And then it begins to sound silly. | > | | If you don't explain why it sounds silly nobody except you will | > find | > | it silly... | > We have a pure Qt5 app! (Huzza!) (but we use QT3_SUPPORT, and | > QT4_SUPPORT since we couldn't be bothered to clean up the code.) | | ??? | Didn't you notice the hundred commits that got rid of QT3_SUPPORT?
Sure did. But the argument put forward was that we don't have to do anything since QT3_SUPPORT is a supported part of Qt4. -- Lgb