Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > | >>> Conclusion: this is not a valid objection. Besides Peter is
| > | > | >>> committed to get rid of those compat methods.
| > | > | >> Then let's convince Lars that this is not a showstopper :-)
| > | > | > Trolltech considers the QT3 compat stuff as regular part of Qt4, 
i.e.
| > | > | > pretty much the same way the <cxxxx> headers are part of C++.
| > | > | | Conclusion: We are even ready for Qt5 now :-)
| > | > And then it begins to sound silly.
| > | | If you don't explain why it sounds silly nobody except you will
| > find
| > | it silly...
| > We have a pure Qt5 app! (Huzza!) (but we use QT3_SUPPORT, and
| > QT4_SUPPORT since we couldn't be bothered to clean up the code.)
| 
| ???
| Didn't you notice the hundred commits that got rid of QT3_SUPPORT?

Sure did.

But the argument put forward was that we don't have to do anything
since QT3_SUPPORT is a supported part of Qt4.

-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to