On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 05:34:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Did you say why
>
> class MathStream : public ostream {
> MathStream(ostream & os) {
> ostream::rdbuf(os.rdbuf());
> }
> };
>
> did not work?
Probably not as I never tried that.
Andre'
--
Those who
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Yes, but we aready use + 'c' with string, my patch only makes us
Lars> use it a bit more. So if there are problems with this, we
Lars> already have the problem.
OK, let's try it, then.
JMarc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Yes, the math streams. Currently they wrap an ostream and implement
>> | operator<< individually to delegate work.
>>
>> yes... the operator<< for string is missing...
>
| It's in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> I realize that... but to soothe you a bit... I do not really add
| Lars> anything new, I just makes it more consistent.
>
| Lars> f.ex. we use sometimes find("c") and sometim
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I realize that... but to soothe you a bit... I do not really add
Lars> anything new, I just makes it more consistent.
Lars> f.ex. we use sometimes find("c") and sometimes find('c'), both
Lars> work, but find('c') is faster and
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Yes, the math streams. Currently they wrap an ostream and implement
> | operator<< individually to delegate work.
>
> yes... the operator<< for string is missing...
It's in another header as it is rarely used.
> | This shou
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:11:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> f.ex. we use sometimes find("c") and sometimes find('c'), both work,
> but find('c') is faster and has smaller mem-footprint. same goes for
> << "c" vs. << 'c' and + "c" vs. + 'c'.
Nobody opposes the proposed change on techni
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 03:21:38PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
>> >
>> | The math outputstream stuff is still a bit fragile. I've not seen anything
>> | in the patch that is likely to break
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> No specifics? Bad for you arguments then...
>
| I'm not giving arguments, just warnings. I know that you are going to
| apply your patch anyway, so I am covering my ass. I be
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> No specifics? Bad for you arguments then...
I'm not giving arguments, just warnings. I know that you are going to
apply your patch anyway, so I am covering my ass. I bet you can
already here be yell "I told you so!".
JMarc
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 03:21:38PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
> >
> | The math outputstream stuff is still a bit fragile. I've not seen anything
> | in the patch that is likely to break something, but _I_ would not apply
> | perl -pi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
>
| The math outputstream stuff is still a bit fragile. I've not seen anything
| in the patch that is likely to break something,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
>
| I would be surprised if it did not create obscure bugs here and
| there.
I'd be surprised if it creaded obsucre bugs
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
I would be surprised if it did not create obscure bugs here and there.
There have been cases in the past where we had to use "" instead of ''
to avoid wrong interpretation of
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
The math outputstream stuff is still a bit fragile. I've not seen anything
in the patch that is likely to break something, but _I_ would not apply
perl -pi style changes ther
Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
charstr-1.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--
Lgb
16 matches
Mail list logo
