Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 03:21:38PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Please have a quick glance and come with objections.
>> >
>> | The math outputstream stuff is still a bit fragile. I've not seen anything
>> | in the patch that is likely to break something, but _I_ would not apply
>> | perl -pi style changes there.
>>
>> I have no idea what "perl -pi style changes" are?
>
| Things like running perl -pi -e 's:"([a-zA-Z 0-9])":'\1':g' *.[Ch]
| modulo proper quoting.
I did all the changes manually, and skip all parts where I was not
sure (or farily so) about correctness.
>> | This part probably should be reworked to use streambufs properly, but I do
>> | not know how to do it.
>>
>> The math streams?
>
| Yes, the math streams. Currently they wrap an ostream and implement
| operator<< individually to delegate work.
yes... the operator<< for string is missing...
| This should be done using
| streambufs which is said to be the Right Solution.
yes, and it is not even hard...
--
Lgb
